World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16256 15288 8172 7559 512 21824

Michael M. Todd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael M. Todd between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael M. Todd published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2013. 2 of the 726 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2013. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 11 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 19 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 24 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1972 2025

726 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael M. Todd: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 2
1981 5
1982 9
1983 5
1984 11
1985 8
1986 9
1987 10
1988 10
1989 19
1990 16
1991 9
1992 24
1993 15
1994 16
1995 10
1996 12
1997 11
1998 13
1999 15
2000 18
2001 12
2002 17
2003 21
2004 16
2005 19
2006 15
2007 20
2008 20
2009 28
2010 27
2011 27
2012 28
2013 39
2014 28
2015 25
2016 22
2017 28
2018 12
2019 15
2020 22
2021 23
2022 4
2023 8
2024 0
2025 2
Total 726
Download as CSV

Michael M. Todd publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 512
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael M. Todd D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael M. Todd is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research contributions predominantly lie in the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Surgery, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Developmental Neuroscience.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System, 2021, Anesthesiology
  • 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade, 2022, Anesthesiology
  • Bupivacaine Pharmacokinetics and Breast Milk Excretion of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered After Cesarean Birth, 2020, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Sugammadex Is Not a Silver Bullet: Caveats Regarding Unmonitored Reversal, 2023, Anesthesiology
  • Enhancing Bayesian Inference-Based Damage Diagnostics Through Domain Translation With Application to Miter Gates, 2025, Journal of Mechanical Design

Michael M. Todd frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Mechanical Design
  • Current anesthesiology reports

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Evan D. Kharasch
  • Henry Ruth
  • Ralph Tovell
  • James E. Eckenhoff
  • Leroy D. Vandam

Their main topics of research span several subjects, including:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Medical History and Innovations
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Best Publications

  • Clinical Uses of α2-Adrenergic Agonists

    Takahiko Kamibayashi;Mervyn Maze

  • Perioperative Heat Balance

    Daniel I. Sessler

  • Mild Intraoperative Hypothermia during Surgery for Intracranial Aneurysm

    Michael M. Todd;Bradley J. Hindman;William R. Clarke;James C. Torner

  • A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide.

    Michael M. Todd;David S. Warner;Martin D. Sokoll;Mazen A. Maktabi

  • Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions.

    John Guy;Bradley J. Hindman;Kristy Z. Baker;Cecil O. Borel

  • Consensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular Monitoring.

    Mohamed Naguib;Sorin J. Brull;Aaron F. Kopman;Jennifer M. Hunter

  • Mild hypothermia reduces infarct size resulting from temporary but not permanent focal ischemia in rats.

    Todd R. Ridenour;David S. Warner;Michael M. Todd;Alice C. McAllister

  • A Comparison of the Cerebrovascular and Metabolic Effects of Halothane and Isolflurane in the Cat

    Michael M. Todd;John C. Drummond

  • Effects of Hypothermia on the Rate of Excitatory Amino Acid Release After Ischemic Depolarization

    Ken Nakashima;Michael M. Todd

  • Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study

    Blessing N R Jaja;Gustavo Saposnik;Hester F. Lingsma;Erin Macdonald

  • Sevoflurane and halothane reduce focal ischemic brain damage in the rat : possible influence on thermoregulation

    David S. Warner;Claude McFarlane;Michael M. Todd;Paula Ludwig

  • Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. An in vivo cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality

    Paul D. Sawin;Michael M. Todd;Vincent C. Traynelis;Stella B. Farrell

  • Practice Advisory for Intraoperative Awareness and Brain Function Monitoring A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Intraoperative Awareness

    Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum;James F. Arens;Daniel J. Cole;Karen B. Domino

  • Mild hypothermia as a protective therapy during intracranial aneurysm surgery: a randomized prospective pilot trial

    Bradley J. Hindman;Michael M. Todd;Adrian W. Gelb;Christopher M. Loftus

  • Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans

    David O. Peterson;John C. Drummond;Michael M. Todd

  • A comfortable hypothesis reevaluated. Cerebral metabolic depression and brain protection during ischemia.

    M. M. Todd;D. S. Warner

  • Are Anesthesia and Surgery During Infancy Associated With Altered Academic Performance During Childhood

    Robert I. Block;Joss J. Thomas;Emine O. Bayman;James Y. Choi

  • A comparison of the cerebral protective effects of isoflurane and barbiturates during temporary focal ischemia in primates.

    Daniel G. Nehls;Michael M. Todd;Robert F. Spetzler;John C. Drummond

  • The incidence of pneumocephalus after supratentorial craniotomy. Observations on the disappearance of intracranial air

    Daniel K. Reasoner;Michael M. Todd;Franklin L Scamman;David S. Warner

  • Comparison of Remifentanil and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Supratentorial Space-Occupying Lesions

    John Guy;Bradley J. Hindman;Kristy Z. Baker;Cecil O. Borel

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Warner
David S. Warner Duke University
Franklin Dexter
Franklin Dexter University of Iowa
James C. Torner
James C. Torner University of Iowa
Tom A. Schweizer
Tom A. Schweizer St. Michael's Hospital
R. Loch Macdonald
R. Loch Macdonald University of Toronto
Stephan A. Mayer
Stephan A. Mayer New York Medical College
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Peter J. Kirkpatrick University of Cambridge
Christian M. Puttlitz
Christian M. Puttlitz Colorado State University
William L. Young
William L. Young University of California, San Francisco
Steven W. Anderson
Steven W. Anderson University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of paths beyond traditional medical school. Many students and professionals look for flexible options to advance their healthcare careers, especially through online learning.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical levels quickly, accelerated dnp programs offer a fast track to the Doctor of Nursing Practice credential. Those with budget concerns can also find value in the cheapest dnp program options without sacrificing quality.

If you are just entering the nursing field, fast track lpn programs online allow you to become a Licensed Practical Nurse efficiently, making it easier to start gaining clinical experience.

For those interested in mental health, the fastest psych np program online provides a practical route to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner—an increasingly vital role in healthcare.

Whether you’re switching careers or looking to advance, these pathways provide convenient, respected options to build your expertise and impact in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles