World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
21824
World Ranking
16257
National Ranking
8173

Michael M. Todd publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael M. Todd D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael M. Todd is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research contributions predominantly lie in the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Surgery, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Developmental Neuroscience.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System, 2021, Anesthesiology
  • 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade, 2022, Anesthesiology
  • Bupivacaine Pharmacokinetics and Breast Milk Excretion of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered After Cesarean Birth, 2020, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Sugammadex Is Not a Silver Bullet: Caveats Regarding Unmonitored Reversal, 2023, Anesthesiology
  • Enhancing Bayesian Inference-Based Damage Diagnostics Through Domain Translation With Application to Miter Gates, 2025, Journal of Mechanical Design

Michael M. Todd frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Mechanical Design
  • Current anesthesiology reports

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Evan D. Kharasch
  • Henry Ruth
  • Ralph Tovell
  • James E. Eckenhoff
  • Leroy D. Vandam

Their main topics of research span several subjects, including:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Medical History and Innovations
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Best Publications

  • Clinical Uses of α2-Adrenergic Agonists

    Takahiko Kamibayashi;Mervyn Maze

  • Perioperative Heat Balance

    Daniel I. Sessler

  • Mild Intraoperative Hypothermia during Surgery for Intracranial Aneurysm

    Michael M. Todd;Bradley J. Hindman;William R. Clarke;James C. Torner

  • A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide.

    Michael M. Todd;David S. Warner;Martin D. Sokoll;Mazen A. Maktabi

  • Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions.

    John Guy;Bradley J. Hindman;Kristy Z. Baker;Cecil O. Borel

  • Consensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular Monitoring.

    Mohamed Naguib;Sorin J. Brull;Aaron F. Kopman;Jennifer M. Hunter

  • Mild hypothermia reduces infarct size resulting from temporary but not permanent focal ischemia in rats.

    Todd R. Ridenour;David S. Warner;Michael M. Todd;Alice C. McAllister

  • A Comparison of the Cerebrovascular and Metabolic Effects of Halothane and Isolflurane in the Cat

    Michael M. Todd;John C. Drummond

  • Effects of Hypothermia on the Rate of Excitatory Amino Acid Release After Ischemic Depolarization

    Ken Nakashima;Michael M. Todd

  • Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study

    Blessing N R Jaja;Gustavo Saposnik;Hester F. Lingsma;Erin Macdonald

  • Sevoflurane and halothane reduce focal ischemic brain damage in the rat : possible influence on thermoregulation

    David S. Warner;Claude McFarlane;Michael M. Todd;Paula Ludwig

  • Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. An in vivo cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality

    Paul D. Sawin;Michael M. Todd;Vincent C. Traynelis;Stella B. Farrell

  • Practice Advisory for Intraoperative Awareness and Brain Function Monitoring A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Intraoperative Awareness

    Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum;James F. Arens;Daniel J. Cole;Karen B. Domino

  • Mild hypothermia as a protective therapy during intracranial aneurysm surgery: a randomized prospective pilot trial

    Bradley J. Hindman;Michael M. Todd;Adrian W. Gelb;Christopher M. Loftus

  • Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans

    David O. Peterson;John C. Drummond;Michael M. Todd

  • A comfortable hypothesis reevaluated. Cerebral metabolic depression and brain protection during ischemia.

    M. M. Todd;D. S. Warner

  • Are Anesthesia and Surgery During Infancy Associated With Altered Academic Performance During Childhood

    Robert I. Block;Joss J. Thomas;Emine O. Bayman;James Y. Choi

  • A comparison of the cerebral protective effects of isoflurane and barbiturates during temporary focal ischemia in primates.

    Daniel G. Nehls;Michael M. Todd;Robert F. Spetzler;John C. Drummond

  • The incidence of pneumocephalus after supratentorial craniotomy. Observations on the disappearance of intracranial air

    Daniel K. Reasoner;Michael M. Todd;Franklin L Scamman;David S. Warner

  • Comparison of Remifentanil and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Supratentorial Space-Occupying Lesions

    John Guy;Bradley J. Hindman;Kristy Z. Baker;Cecil O. Borel

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Warner
David S. Warner Duke University
Franklin Dexter
Franklin Dexter University of Iowa
James C. Torner
James C. Torner University of Iowa
Tom A. Schweizer
Tom A. Schweizer St. Michael's Hospital
R. Loch Macdonald
R. Loch Macdonald University of Toronto
Stephan A. Mayer
Stephan A. Mayer New York Medical College
Peter J. Kirkpatrick
Peter J. Kirkpatrick University of Cambridge
Christian M. Puttlitz
Christian M. Puttlitz Colorado State University
William L. Young
William L. Young University of California, San Francisco
Steven W. Anderson
Steven W. Anderson University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of paths beyond traditional medical school. Many students and professionals look for flexible options to advance their healthcare careers, especially through online learning.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical levels quickly, accelerated dnp programs offer a fast track to the Doctor of Nursing Practice credential. Those with budget concerns can also find value in the cheapest dnp program options without sacrificing quality.

If you are just entering the nursing field, fast track lpn programs online allow you to become a Licensed Practical Nurse efficiently, making it easier to start gaining clinical experience.

For those interested in mental health, the fastest psych np program online provides a practical route to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner—an increasingly vital role in healthcare.

Whether you’re switching careers or looking to advance, these pathways provide convenient, respected options to build your expertise and impact in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles