World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 99 8698 4484 492 29441

William L. Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William L. Young between 1984 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William L. Young published across 33 years, from 1984 to 2016, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2012. 11 of the 492 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2012. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 17 publications 1991: 17 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications
1984 2016

492 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William L. Young: publications per year, 1984 to 2016
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 4
1986 4
1987 5
1988 9
1989 13
1990 17
1991 17
1992 9
1993 9
1994 16
1995 11
1996 17
1997 18
1998 17
1999 8
2000 9
2001 11
2002 19
2003 7
2004 21
2005 21
2006 25
2007 16
2008 29
2009 22
2010 20
2011 23
2012 39
2013 22
2014 21
2015 5
2016 6
Total 492
Download as CSV

William L. Young publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William L. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 492 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 492
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

William L. Young D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William L. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 99
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William L. Young was affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their career involved research activities connected to this institution.

While specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, and awards won have not been documented here, the affiliation suggests a professional focus that likely intersected with disciplines represented at the university.

The available data confirms that William L. Young is deceased. All references to the scientist are therefore written in the past tense.

No explicit record of publications or research contributions is provided in the current dataset, so details regarding their scientific output or collaboration networks cannot be included.

Best Publications

  • Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial

    J. P. Mohr;Michael K. Parides;Christian Stapf;Christian Stapf;Ellen Moquete

  • Recommendations for the Management of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association

    Christopher S. Ogilvy;Philip E. Stieg;Issam Awad;Robert D. Brown

  • Aneurysm Growth Occurs at Region of Low Wall Shear Stress. Patient-Specific Correlation of Hemodynamics and Growth in a Longitudinal Study

    Loic Boussel;Vitaliy Rayz;Charles McCulloch;Alastair Martin

  • Antithrombogenic property of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in nanofibrous vascular grafts.

    Craig K. Hashi;Yiqian Zhu;Guo-Yuan Yang;William L. Young

  • A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery.

    Michael T. Lawton;Helen Kim;Charles E. McCulloch;Bahar Mikhak

  • MicroRNA-9 Coordinates Proliferation and Migration of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Neural Progenitors

    Celine Delaloy;Lei Liu;Jin-A Lee;Hua Su

  • Endothelial progenitor cell transplantation improves long-term stroke outcome in mice.

    Yongfeng Fan;Fanxia Shen;Fanxia Shen;Tim Frenzel;Wei Zhu

  • Do Standard Monitoring Sites Reflect True Brain Temperature When Profound Hypothermia Is Rapidly Induced and Reversed

    J. Gilbert Stone;William L. Young;Craig R. Smith;Robert A. Solomon

  • The influence of hemodynamic and anatomic factors on hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

    Abraham Kader;William L. Young;John Pile-Spellman;Henning Mast

  • Critical Roles of Macrophages in the Formation of Intracranial Aneurysm

    Yasuhisa Kanematsu;Miyuki Kanematsu;Chie Kurihara;Yoshiteru Tada

  • Untreated brain arteriovenous malformation Patient-level meta-analysis of hemorrhage predictors

    Helen Kim;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Charles E. McCulloch;Christian Stapf

  • Essential Regulation of CNS Angiogenesis by the Orphan G Protein–Coupled Receptor GPR124

    Frank Kuhnert;Michael R. Mancuso;Amir Shamloo;Hsiao-Ting Wang

  • The Epidemiology of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

    Berman Mf;Sciacca Rr;Pile-Spellman J;Stapf C

  • Intracranial aneurysms: links among inflammation, hemodynamics and vascular remodeling.

    Tomoki Hashimoto;Hui Meng;William L. Young

  • Feeding Artery Pressure and Venous Drainage Pattern Are Primary Determinants of Hemorrhage From Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

    D. Hoang Duong;William L. Young;Meng C. Vang;Robert R. Sciacca

  • Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions.

    John Guy;Bradley J. Hindman;Kristy Z. Baker;Cecil O. Borel

  • Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics.

    Loic Boussel;Loic Boussel;Vitaliy Rayz;Alastair Martin;Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton

  • Longitudinal risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with arteriovenous malformation of the brain within a defined population.

    Alexander X. Halim;S. Claiborne Johnston;Vineeta Singh;Charles E. McCulloch

  • Biology of Vascular Malformations of the Brain

    Gabrielle G. Leblanc;Eugene Golanov;Issam A. Awad;William L. Young

  • Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials.

    Therapeutic Neuroradiology

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael T. Lawton
Michael T. Lawton Barrow Neurological Institute
Guo-Yuan Yang
Guo-Yuan Yang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Charles E. McCulloch
Charles E. McCulloch University of California, San Francisco
Randall T. Higashida
Randall T. Higashida University of California, San Francisco
Pui-Yan Kwok
Pui-Yan Kwok University of California, San Francisco
Stephen Sidney
Stephen Sidney Kaiser Permanente
Christopher F. Dowd
Christopher F. Dowd University of California, San Francisco
Douglas A. Marchuk
Douglas A. Marchuk Duke University
Wade S. Smith
Wade S. Smith University of California, San Francisco
Jay P. Mohr
Jay P. Mohr Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medicine but exploring alternative pathways, several online degrees offer flexible options for healthcare careers. Many students opt for online nursing programs, which can fast-track entry into the medical field. Wondering what is the cheapest online college for nursing? It’s important to compare tuition, accreditation, and program flexibility to find the best fit for your goals.

For those pursuing advanced practice roles, consider exploring the cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs. These programs prepare graduates for high-responsibility clinical work while allowing them to study remotely.

If you’re already an RN, transitioning to a four-year degree online is more accessible than ever. The cheapest online rn to bsn programs enable nurses to advance their education and improve career prospects without pausing their professional progress.

Nurses seeking leadership, teaching, or research roles can consider doctoral studies. Finding the cheapest dnp online program ensures aspiring nurse leaders can reach their goals with minimal financial strain. Carefully research each program’s accreditation and support services to maximize your success.

Best Scientists Citing William L. Young

Recently Published Articles