World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
70
Citations
14523
World Ranking
1382
National Ranking
180

J. Marcus Rowcliffe publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Marcus Rowcliffe sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

J. Marcus Rowcliffe D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Marcus Rowcliffe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Marcus Rowcliffe is affiliated with the Zoological Society of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant number of publications in the field. The subfields of study include ecology, ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The main topics covered in their work involve wildlife ecology and conservation, species distribution and climate change, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, primate behavior and ecology, conservation, biodiversity and resource management, wildlife-road interactions and conservation, and microplastics and plastic pollution.

Their frequent publication venues showcase a preference for journals related to ecology and conservation, international and interdisciplinary in scope. These venues include:

  • Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • Oryx

J. Marcus Rowcliffe has contributed to several recent papers, demonstrating active engagement in topics related to wildlife monitoring, conservation methods, and population estimation techniques. Recent publications include:

  • "Wild Meat Is Still on the Menu: Progress in Wild Meat Research, Policy, and Practice from 2002 to 2020," 2021, published in Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • "Assessing the camera trap methodologies used to estimate density of unmarked populations," 2021, published in Journal of Applied Ecology
  • "Methods for wildlife monitoring in tropical forests: Comparing human observations, camera traps, and passive acoustic sensors," 2021, published in Conservation Science and Practice
  • "Strict protected areas are essential for the conservation of larger and threatened mammals in a priority region of the Brazilian Cerrado," 2020, published in Biological Conservation
  • "Estimating animal density for a community of species using information obtained only from camera-traps," 2022, published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several coauthors appearing multiple times in their body of work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Oliver R. Wearn
  • Chris Carbone
  • Patrick A. Jansen
  • Robert M. Ewers
  • Jessica K. Haysom

Best Publications

  • Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition

    J. Marcus Rowcliffe;Juliet Field;Samuel T. Turvey;Chris Carbone

  • Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data

    J. Marcus Rowcliffe;Roland Kays;Roland Kays;Bart Kranstauber;Bart Kranstauber;Chris Carbone

  • Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet's biodiversity with networks of remote sensors

    Robin Steenweg;Mark Hebblewhite;Roland Kays;Jorge Ahumada

  • The costs of carnivory

    Chris Carbone;Amber Gf Teacher;J. Marcus Rowcliffe

  • Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs

    Sean A. Rands;Sean A. Rands;Guy Cowlishaw;Richard A. Pettifor;J. Marcus Rowcliffe

  • A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research

    Anthony Caravaggi;Peter B. Banks;A Cole Burton;Caroline M. V. Finlay

  • Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach

    J. Marcus Rowcliffe;Chris Carbone;Patrick A. Jansen;Patrick A. Jansen;Roland Kays

  • Hunting for Consensus: Reconciling Bushmeat Harvest, Conservation, and Development Policy in West and Central Africa

    Elizabeth L. Bennett;Eric Blencowe;Katrina Brandon;David Brown

  • Life history tradeoffs influence mortality associated with the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis

    Trenton W. J. Garner;Susan Walker;Jaime Bosch;Stacey Leech

  • How far do animals go? Determinants of day range in mammals.

    Chris Carbone;Guy Cowlishaw;Nick J. B. Isaac;J. Marcus Rowcliffe

  • Random versus Game Trail-Based Camera Trap Placement Strategy for Monitoring Terrestrial Mammal Communities

    Jeremy J. Cusack;Amy J. Dickman;J. Marcus Rowcliffe;Chris Carbone

  • Evidence for post-depletion sustainability in a mature bushmeat market

    Guy Cowlishaw;Samantha Mendelson;J. Marcus Rowcliffe

  • A model of human hunting impacts in multi-prey communities

    J. Marcus Rowcliffe;Guy Cowlishaw;Janice Long

  • Does the matrix matter? A forest primate in a complex agricultural landscape

    Julie Anderson;J. Marcus Rowcliffe;Guy Cowlishaw

  • Compromised Survivorship in Zoo Elephants

    Ros Clubb;Marcus Rowcliffe;Phyllis C Lee;Khyne U Mar;Khyne U Mar

  • Determinants of urban bushmeat consumption in Río Muni, Equatorial Guinea

    Tamsyn East;Noëlle F. Kümpel;Noëlle F. Kümpel;E.J. Milner-Gulland;J. Marcus Rowcliffe

  • Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities

    Roland Kays;Bart Kranstauber;Patrick Jansen;Chris Carbone

  • Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods

    J.H. Wright;N.A.O. Hill;D. Roe;J.M. Rowcliffe

  • Camera Traps as Sensor Networks for Monitoring Animal Communities

    R. Kays;S. Tilak;Bart Kranstauber;P. Jansen

  • The scale of illegal meat importation from Africa to Europe via Paris

    Anne-Lise Chaber;Anne-Lise Chaber;Sophie Allebone-Webb;Sophie Allebone-Webb;Yves Lignereux;Andrew A. Cunningham

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy Cowlishaw
Guy Cowlishaw Zoological Society of London
Chris Carbone
Chris Carbone Zoological Society of London
Patrick A. Jansen
Patrick A. Jansen Wageningen University & Research
E. J. Milner-Gulland
E. J. Milner-Gulland University of Oxford
Roland Kays
Roland Kays North Carolina State University
Andrew A. Cunningham
Andrew A. Cunningham Zoological Society of London
Robert M. Ewers
Robert M. Ewers Imperial College London
Henry Bernard
Henry Bernard Universiti of Malaysia Sabah
Andrew R. Watkinson
Andrew R. Watkinson University of East Anglia
Tim Coulson
Tim Coulson University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens up diverse career options, especially when paired with further education or interdisciplinary study. Many related fields now offer flexible online pathways, accommodating students from various backgrounds. For example, those interested in the health sciences may consider transitioning through an online speech-language pathology prerequisites program, ideal for non-SLP majors seeking new directions.

Alternatively, pursuing nursing is possible without an undergraduate degree in the field, thanks to online absn programs for non nurses. These accelerated bachelor’s programs let students with non-nursing degrees fast-track entry into nursing careers. Those planning for advanced practice roles like nurse practitioner can also benefit from fast track nurse practitioner programs that shorten the time to licensure.

Salaries for specialized roles, like psychiatric nurse practitioners, vary by location. Explore the earning potential in each state by reviewing psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary data. Whether seeking research, clinical, or interdisciplinary roles, online degrees and streamlined career pathways make it easier than ever to advance in the biological and health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing J. Marcus Rowcliffe

Trending Scientists