World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 45 2853 2592 226 206 85 9114

François Nédélec publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by François Nédélec between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. François Nédélec published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2017. 6 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2017. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
François Nédélec: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 5
2011 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 7
2015 6
2016 7
2017 10
2018 8
2019 6
2020 7
2021 2
2022 9
2023 3
2024 4
2025 2
Total 106
Download as CSV

François Nédélec publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where François Nédélec sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 85 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90 85
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

François Nédélec D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where François Nédélec sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 45
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

François Nédélec is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. The scientist's research primarily focuses on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant concentration within subfields such as Cell Biology, Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, and Epidemiology.

The main topics addressed in Nédélec's work include:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Cellular Automata and Applications

The scientist has published extensively, with frequent publications in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biophysical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, and Nature Communications.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by François Nédélec include:

  • The 2020 motile active matter roadmap, 2020, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
  • Rab27a co-ordinates actin-dependent transport by controlling organelle-associated motors and track assembly proteins, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Bond Type and Discretization of Nonmuscle Myosin II Are Critical for Simulated Contractile Dynamics, 2020, Biophysical Journal
  • Cross-linker design determines microtubule network organization by opposing motors, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Insights from graph theory on the morphologies of actomyosin networks with multilinkers, 2020, Physical review. E

Collaboration is a notable element in Nédélec's body of work, with frequent co-authors including Wei-Xiang Chew, Thomas Surrey, Gil Henkin, Daniel B. Cortes, and Amy Shaub Maddox.

Among distinctions, François Nédélec is a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • The 2020 motile active matter roadmap

    Gerhard Gompper;Roland G Winkler;Thomas Speck;Alexandre Solon

  • Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification

    Jean-Léon Maître;Hervé Turlier;Rukshala Illukkumbura;Björn Eismann

  • Pulsatile cell-autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo.

    Jean-Léon Maître;Ritsuya Niwayama;Hervé Turlier;François Nédélec

  • Mechanisms for focusing mitotic spindle poles by minus end-directed motor proteins.

    Gohta Goshima;François Nédélec;Ronald D. Vale

  • Crosslinkers and motors organize dynamic microtubules to form stable bipolar arrays in fission yeast.

    Marcel E. Janson;Rose Loughlin;Isabelle Loïodice;Chuanhai Fu

  • Collective Langevin dynamics of flexible cytoskeletal fibers

    Francois Nedelec;Dietrich Foethke

  • Cortical microtubule contacts position the spindle in C. elegans embryos.

    Cleopatra Kozlowski;Martin Srayko;Francois Nedelec

  • Architecture and Connectivity Govern Actin Network Contractility.

    Hajer Ennomani;Gaëlle Letort;Christophe Guérin;Jean-Louis Martiel

  • Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions

    François Nédélec

  • Katanin Contributes to Interspecies Spindle Length Scaling in Xenopus

    Rose Loughlin;Jeremy D. Wilbur;Francis J. McNally;François J. Nédélec

  • Systematic Nanoscale Analysis of Endocytosis Links Efficient Vesicle Formation to Patterned Actin Nucleation.

    Markus Mund;Johannes Albertus van der Beek;Joran Deschamps;Serge Dmitrieff

  • Self-organisation and forces in the microtubule cytoskeleton.

    François Nédélec;Thomas Surrey;Eric Karsenti

  • A computational model predicts Xenopus meiotic spindle organization

    Rose Loughlin;Rose Loughlin;Rebecca Heald;François Nédélec

  • Phospho-regulated interaction between kinesin-6 Klp9p and microtubule bundler Ase1p promotes spindle elongation.

    Chuanhai Fu;Jonathan J. Ward;Isabelle Loiodice;Isabelle Loiodice;Guilhem Velve-Casquillas;Guilhem Velve-Casquillas

  • A self-organization framework for symmetry breaking in the mammalian embryo

    Sebastian Wennekamp;Sven Mesecke;François Nédélec;Takashi Hiiragi

  • A theory that predicts behaviors of disordered cytoskeletal networks

    Julio M Belmonte;Maria Leptin;François Nédélec

  • Visualizing the functional architecture of the endocytic machinery.

    Andrea Picco;Markus Mund;Jonas Ries;François Nédélec

  • Nesprin-1α-Dependent Microtubule Nucleation from the Nuclear Envelope via Akap450 Is Necessary for Nuclear Positioning in Muscle Cells.

    Petra Gimpel;Yin Loon Lee;Radoslaw M. Sobota;Alessandra Calvi

  • Modelling microtubule patterns

    Eric Karsenti;François Nédélec;Thomas Surrey

  • Effects of Confinement on the Self-Organization of Microtubules and Motors

    Mathieu Pinot;Franck Chesnel;Jacek Kubiak;Isabelle Arnal

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Surrey
Thomas Surrey The Francis Crick Institute
Eric Karsenti
Eric Karsenti École Normale Supérieure
Laurent Blanchoin
Laurent Blanchoin Grenoble Alpes University
Marko Kaksonen
Marko Kaksonen University of Geneva
Herbert Levine
Herbert Levine Northeastern University
Manuel Théry
Manuel Théry Grenoble Alpes University
Maria Leptin
Maria Leptin University of Cologne
Claude Antony
Claude Antony Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Paul S. Maddox
Paul S. Maddox University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stanislas Leibler
Stanislas Leibler Rockefeller University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore molecular biology studies in the USA, it’s important to consider related online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare and science. Many prospective students are interested in flexible online programs that prepare them for dynamic, high-demand fields.

For example, if you have a background in communication sciences or are considering a career in speech therapy, you may want to look into asha approved slp programs online. These programs meet the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) standards while offering accelerated, remote learning options.

Likewise, those with a non-SLP bachelor’s degree can take advantage of a SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates, providing a direct route into advanced SLP roles and licensure.

If nursing is of interest, there are also accelerated bsn programs for non nurses available online, allowing quick entry into the nursing profession.

For those aiming at specialized roles, understanding earning potential is vital. Review the pmhnp salary by state to help inform your career decisions in psychiatric and mental health nursing.

Best Scientists Citing François Nédélec

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles