World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

M.-C. Fok publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.-C. Fok sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

M.-C. Fok D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.-C. Fok sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

M.-C. Fok is affiliated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the dynamics of the ionosphere and magnetosphere as well as solar and space plasma phenomena.

The main fields of study covered by M.-C. Fok's research include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

The scientist's subfields of study reflect a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Geophysics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The key topics addressed in their work are:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Planetary Science and Exploration

Among their recent papers are:

  • Soft X-ray and ENA Imaging of the Earth's Dayside Magnetosphere, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • A Case Study on the Origin of Near-Earth Plasma, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • What Is Unusual About the Third Largest Geomagnetic Storm of Solar Cycle 24?, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • New Developments in the Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Model, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Local Heating of Oxygen Ions in the Presence of Magnetosonic Waves: Possible Source for the Warm Plasma Cloak?, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

The frequent coauthors collaborating with M.-C. Fok include:

  • C. Ferradas
  • N. Buzulukova
  • A. Glocer
  • S. B. Kang
  • D. G. Sibeck

Their publications are most often featured in the following venues:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

M.-C. Fok was awarded the designation of Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2019, recognizing contributions within their scientific discipline.

Best Publications

  • Radiation Belt Environment model: Application to space weather nowcasting

    Mei-Ching Fok;Richard B. Horne;Nigel P. Meredith;Sarah A. Glauert

  • Lifetime of ring current particles due to coulomb collisions in the plasmasphere

    M.-C. Fok;J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;T. E. Cravens

  • Decay of equatorial ring current ions and associated aeronomical consequences

    M. C. Fok;J. U. Kozyra;A. F. Nagy;C. E. Rasmussen

  • Global ENA observations of the storm mainphase ring current: Implications for skewed electric fields in the inner magnetosphere

    P. C:son Brandt;S. Ohtani;D. G. Mitchell;M.-C. Fok

  • The dayside reconnection X line

    T. E. Moore;M.-C. Fok;M. O. Chandler

  • Impulsive enhancements of oxygen ions during substorms

    Mei-Ching Fok;Thomas E. Moore;Pontus C. Brandt;Dominique C. Delcourt

  • The Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere Model

    M.-C. Fok;N. Y. Buzulukova;N. Y. Buzulukova;S.-H. Chen;S.-H. Chen;A. Glocer

  • Global ENA IMAGE Simulations

    M.-C. Fok;T. E. Moore;G. R. Wilson;J. D. Perez

  • The role of precipitation losses in producing the rapid early recovery phase of the Great Magnetic Storm of February 1986

    J. U. Kozyra;M.-C. Fok;E. R. Sanchez;D. S. Evans

  • Ring current and the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling during the superstorm of 20 November 2003

    Y. Ebihara;M.-C. Fok;S. Sazykin;M. F. Thomsen

  • A bounce-averaged kinetic model of the ring current ion population

    V. K. Jordanova;J. U. Kozyra;G. V. Khazanov;A. F. Nagy

  • X‐ray emission from the terrestrial magnetosheath including the cusps

    I. P. Robertson;M. R. Collier;T. E. Cravens;M.-C. Fok

  • CRCM + BATS‒R‒US two‒way coupling

    A. Glocer;M. Fok;X. Meng;G. Toth

  • Observations of neutral atoms from the solar wind

    Michael R. Collier;Thomas E. Moore;Keith W. Ogilvie;Dennis Chornay

  • On the relative importance of convection and temperature to the behavior of the ionosphere in North America during January 6–12, 1997

    P. G. Richards;M. J. Buonsanto;B. W. Reinisch;J. Holt

  • Recent Developments in the Radiation Belt Environment Model

    M.-C. Fok;A. Glocer;Q. Zheng;Q. Zheng;Richard B. Horne

  • Rapid enhancement of radiation belt electron fluxes due to substorm dipolarization of the geomagnetic field

    Unknown

  • Postmidnight storm‐time enhancement of tens‐of‐keV proton flux

    Y. Ebihara;Y. Ebihara;M.-C. Fok

  • Influence of ionosphere conductivity on the ring current

    Y. Ebihara;M.-C. Fok;R. A. Wolf;T. J. Immel

  • Dynamics of Ring Current and Electric Fields in the Inner Magnetosphere During Disturbed Periods: CRCM-BATS-R-US Coupled Model

    N. Buzulukova;M.-C. Fok;A. Pulkkinen;A. Pulkkinen;M. Kuznetsova

  • Plasma sheet and (nonstorm) ring current formation from solar and polar wind sources

    T.E. Moore;M.-C. Fok;M.O. Chandler;C.R. Chappell

  • Two‐dimensional observations of overshielding during a magnetic storm by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) Hokkaido radar

    Y. Ebihara;N. Nishitani;T. Kikuchi;T. Ogawa

Frequent Co-Authors

Yusuke Ebihara
Yusuke Ebihara Kyoto University
David J. McComas
David J. McComas Princeton University
J. Goldstein
J. Goldstein Southwest Research Institute
Pontus C. Brandt
Pontus C. Brandt Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Michael W. Liemohn
Michael W. Liemohn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard A. Wolf
Richard A. Wolf Rice University
David G. Sibeck
David G. Sibeck Goddard Space Flight Center
Marc R. Hairston
Marc R. Hairston The University of Texas at Dallas
Michelle F. Thomsen
Michelle F. Thomsen Planetary Science Institute
Edmond C. Roelof
Edmond C. Roelof Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields through online education. For instance, those interested in expanding their cultural understanding may pursue a spanish degree online, which can be a valuable asset in global environmental consultancy and fieldwork.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science careers may find tailored opportunities through military friendly online spanish degree programs, providing flexible study options that fit their unique experiences and schedules.

Creative professionals interested in integrating artistic perspectives with scientific research might consider an online mfa creative writing degree to enhance communication skills, essential for environmental advocacy and education roles.

Additionally, leadership and management skills gained from a masters degree in human resource management online can strengthen project management capabilities in multidisciplinary Earth Science teams. Exploring these related degrees enriches career options and professional growth beyond traditional geological paths.

Best Scientists Citing M.-C. Fok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles