World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
6340
World Ranking
13415
National Ranking
519

Ettore Merlo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ettore Merlo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ettore Merlo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ettore Merlo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ettore Merlo is affiliated with Polytechnique Montréal in Canada and works primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their research encompasses several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing, Safety Research, and Software. The main topics addressed in their work include Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Web Application Security Vulnerabilities, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Software Engineering Research, and Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy.

The recent academic contributions of Ettore Merlo include papers published between 2021 and 2025, reflecting an ongoing engagement with emerging issues in software engineering and machine learning. Notable papers are:

  • Phishing Kits Source Code Similarity Distribution: A Case Study, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)
  • Models of Computational Profiles to Study the Likelihood of DNN Metamorphic Test Cases, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Coauthors working frequently with Ettore Merlo include Qiaolin Qin, Heng Li, Foutse Khomh, Guy-Vincent Jourdan, and Iosif-Viorel Onut. These collaborations highlight a network of researchers focused on software evolution, security, and machine learning.

The preferred publication venues for Ettore Merlo's work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information and Software Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Automated Software Engineering
  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)

Best Publications

  • Recovering traceability links between code and documentation

    G. Antoniol;G. Canfora;G. Casazza;A. De Lucia

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Clone Detection Tools

    S. Bellon;R. Koschke;G. Antoniol;J. Krinke

  • Pattern matching for clone and concept detection

    K. A. Kontogiannis;R. Demori;E. Merlo;M. Galler

  • Assessing the benefits of incorporating function clone detection in a development process

    B. Lague;D. Proulx;J. Mayrand;E.M. Merlo

  • Advanced clone-analysis to support object-oriented system refactoring

    M. Balazinska;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • Measuring clone based reengineering opportunities

    M. Balazinska;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • Analyzing cloning evolution in the Linux kernel

    G. Antoniol;U. Villano;E. Merlo;M. Di Penta

  • Pattern matching for clone and concept detection

    Unknown

  • Partial redesign of Java software systems based on clone analysis

    M. Balazinska;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • An automatic approach to identify class evolution discontinuities

    G. Antoniol;M. Di Penta;E. Merlo

  • Reengineering user interfaces

    E. Merlo;P.-Y. Gagne;J.-F. Girard;K. Kontogiannis

  • Extending software quality assessment techniques to Java systems

    J.-F. Patenaude;E. Merlo;M. Dagenais;B. Lague

  • A novel approach to optimize clone refactoring activity

    Salah Bouktif;Giuliano Antoniol;Ettore Merlo;Markus Neteler

  • Modeling clones evolution through time series

    G. Antoniol;G. Casazza;M. Di Penta;E. Merlo

  • A cliche-based environment to support architectural reverse engineering

    R. Fiutem;P. Tonella;G. Anteniol;E. Merlo

  • Investigating reverse engineering technologies for the CAS program understanding project

    E. Buss;R. De Mori;W. M. Gentleman;J. Henshaw

  • Recovering code to documentation links in OO systems

    G. Antoniol;G. Canfora;A. De Lucia;E. Merlo

  • Detecting buffer overflow via automatic test input data generation

    C. Del Grosso;G. Antoniol;E. Merlo;P. Galinier

  • Flow insensitive C++ pointers and polymorphism analysis and its application to slicing

    Paolo Tonella;Giuliano Antoniol;Roberto Fiutem;Ettore Merlo

  • Program understanding and maintenance with the CANTO environment

    G. Antoniol;R. Fiutem;G. Lutteri;P. Tonella

  • Improving network applications security: a new heuristic to generate stress testing data

    Concettina Del Grosso;Giuliano Antoniol;Massimiliano Di Penta;Philippe Galinier

  • How to Certify Machine Learning Based Safety-critical Systems? A Systematic Literature Review

    Florian Tambon;Gabriel Laberge;Le An;Amin Nikanjam

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuliano Antoniol
Giuliano Antoniol Polytechnique Montréal
Kostas Kontogiannis
Kostas Kontogiannis York University
Paolo Tonella
Paolo Tonella Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Renato De Mori
Renato De Mori McGill University
Rainer Koschke
Rainer Koschke University of Bremen
Massimiliano Di Penta
Massimiliano Di Penta University of Sannio
Hausi A. Müller
Hausi A. Müller University of Victoria
Magdalena Balazinska
Magdalena Balazinska University of Washington
Foutse Khomh
Foutse Khomh Polytechnique Montréal
Allen W. Cowley
Allen W. Cowley Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of degrees and career directions. Many students consider the data science learning path for its emphasis on analytics, programming, and real-world problem-solving. Data science is increasingly in demand, offering roles in tech, finance, healthcare, and more.

If you’re interested in the technology behind computing devices, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can provide a strong technical foundation while offering flexibility for remote learners. This pathway is ideal for students who want to combine hardware knowledge with software skills.

For a quicker route to employment, many positions now value easy licenses and certifications to get. Short-term programs allow you to gain specific expertise—such as cloud computing, cybersecurity, or networking—boosting your resume and job prospects.

Additionally, professionals seeking rapid advancement might pursue one of the shortest master degree programs offered online. These accelerated options can help you move up in your career while saving both time and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Ettore Merlo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles