World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
73
Citations
30651
World Ranking
1549
National Ranking
806

Elliot Soloway publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot Soloway sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 302 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Elliot Soloway D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot Soloway sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elliot Soloway is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research encompasses various fields including ophthalmology, education, developmental and educational psychology, and computer science applications. The scientist's work spans multiple subfields such as ophthalmology, education, and computer science applications, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

Their recent publications include studies and papers across journals and conferences in both medical and educational domains. Notable recent papers are:

  • "EyeScreen," 2022, Ophthalmology Science
  • "Leveraging opportunities for self-regulated learning in smart learning environments," 2025, Smart Learning Environments
  • "Using a Next-Gen Platform and Deeply Digital Curricula to Support Alpha and iGen Learners and Their Teachers," 2024, International Journal on Engineering Science and Technology
  • "Using Roadmap-Formatted Curriculum in Elementary School to Improve NWEA Reading Growth," 2024, Journal of Interactive Learning Research
  • "THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF K-12: IT'S HAPPENING - FINALLY!," 2021, EDULEARN proceedings

Their research topics involve intersections between medical science and education with a particular focus on:

  • Ocular oncology and treatments
  • Retinal diseases and treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Innovative teaching and learning methods
  • Online learning and analytics
  • Online and blended learning
  • Education systems and policy

Elliot Soloway has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Cathie Norris
  • Anne Tapp
  • Alec Bernard
  • Shang Zhou Xia
  • Sahal Saleh

Their work has appeared in multiple publication venues, reflecting contributions to both education and ophthalmology fields. Frequent publication venues include:

  • EDULEARN proceedings
  • Ophthalmology Science
  • Smart Learning Environments
  • International Journal on Engineering Science and Technology
  • Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Best Publications

  • Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning

    Phyllis C. Blumenfeld;Elliot Soloway;Ronald W. Marx;Joseph S. Krajcik

  • A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry

    Chris Quintana;Brian J. Reiser;Elizabeth A. Davis;Joseph Krajcik

  • Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom

    Hsin Kai Wu;Joseph S. Krajcik;Elliot Soloway

  • A Collaborative Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction

    Joseph S. Krajcik;Phyllis C. Blumenfeld;Ronald W. Marx;Elliot Soloway

  • Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools

    Phyllis Blumenfeld;Barry J. Fishman;Joseph Krajcik;Ronald W. Marx

  • Enacting Project-Based Science

    Ronald W. Marx;Phyllis C. Blumenfeld;Joseph S. Krajcik;Elliot Soloway

  • One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration

    Tak-Wai Chan;Jeremy Roschelle;Sherry Hsi;Kinshuk Kinshuk

  • Standardized Test Outcomes for Students Engaged in Inquiry-Based Science Curricula in the Context of Urban Reform.

    Robert Geier;Phyllis C. Blumenfeld;Ronald W. Marx;Joseph S. Krajcik

  • Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century

    Elliot Soloway;Mark Guzdial;Kenneth E. Hay

  • Learning With Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative Communities

    Phyllis C. Blumenfeld;Ronald W. Marx;Elliot Soloway;Joseph Krajcik

  • Expert systems for configuration at Digital: XCON and beyond

    Virginia E. Barker;Dennis E. O'Connor;Judith Bachant;Elliot Soloway

  • Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations

    Barry Fishman;Ronald W. Marx;Phyllis Blumenfeld;Joseph Krajcik

  • Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom

    Raven Mc Crory Wallace;Jeff Kupperman;Joseph Krajcik;Elliot Soloway

  • Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study

    Elliot Soloway;Jeffrey Bonar;Kate Ehrlich

  • Handheld Devices are Ready-At-Hand

    Elliot Soloway;Cathleen Norris;Phyllis Blumenfeld;Barry Fishman

  • Novice mistakes: are the folk wisdoms correct?

    James C. Spohrer;Elliot Soloway

  • Studying the Novice Programmer

    E. Soloway;James C. Spohrer

  • Teaching the Nintendo generation to program

    Mark Guzdial;Elliot Soloway

  • PROUST: Knowledge-Based Program Understanding

    Unknown

  • Mental models and software maintenance

    Unknown

  • Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way

    Chee-Kit Looi;Lung-Hsiang Wong;Hyo-Jeong So;Peter Seow

  • Designing documentation to compensate for delocalized plans

    Elliot Soloway;Robin Lampert;Stan Letovsky;David Littman

  • No Access, No Use, No Impact: Snapshot Surveys of Educational Technology In K-12

    Cathleen Norris;Terry Sullivan;James Poirot;Elliot Soloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Krajcik
Joseph Krajcik Michigan State University
James C. Spohrer
James C. Spohrer IBM (United States)
Phyllis C. Blumenfeld
Phyllis C. Blumenfeld University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ronald W. Marx
Ronald W. Marx University of Arizona
Roger C. Schank
Roger C. Schank Socratic Arts
Barry Fishman
Barry Fishman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark Guzdial
Mark Guzdial University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hsin Kai Wu
Hsin Kai Wu National Taiwan Normal University
Chee-Kit Looi
Chee-Kit Looi Nanyang Technological University
S. Sitharama Iyengar
S. Sitharama Iyengar Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career prospects in technology. For those interested in expanding their scientific foundation beyond computer science, you may wonder, can you get a physics degree online? Many institutions now offer affordable online programs, allowing you to study flexibly while developing a strong understanding of fundamental concepts.

If you prefer a skills-focused approach, the data science learning path is a popular option combining computing, statistics, and analytical thinking. Data science degrees are in high demand and can lead to lucrative roles in a variety of industries, from tech to healthcare.

Another promising field is electrical engineering. Graduates from online electrical engineering career outcomes often find opportunities in sectors like robotics, renewable energy, and telecommunications. The flexibility of online programs allows you to earn a respected degree while balancing other commitments.

For those seeking a quicker route into the workforce, 3-month certificate programs that pay well might be the answer. These certifications can boost your credentials rapidly and open doors to tech careers such as IT support, web development, or cybersecurity.

Best Scientists Citing Elliot Soloway

Trending Scientists