World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
116
Citations
48719
World Ranking
677
National Ranking
408

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
52140
World Ranking
3618
National Ranking
1996

Nancy E. Lane publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy E. Lane sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 592 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nancy E. Lane D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy E. Lane sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Nancy E. Lane is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Rheumatology, Surgery, Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Molecular Biology. The total number of publications attributed to them in Medicine is 425, with subfields distributed as follows: Rheumatology (107), Surgery (93), Physiology (50), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (48), and Molecular Biology (33).

Their work covers several key topics including Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms, Bone health and osteoporosis research, Hip disorders and treatments, Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies, Nutrition and Health in Aging, Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies, and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes.

Nancy E. Lane has contributed to numerous academic venues, often publishing in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, where they have 36 publications. Other frequent venues include UNC Libraries (11 publications), The Journals of Gerontology Series A (9), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (9), and Osteoporosis International (8).

The following recent papers from Nancy E. Lane illustrate the diversity of their research topics:

  • Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression, 2022, Nature Reviews Rheumatology
  • Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans, 2021, Nature Metabolism
  • Lorecivivint, a Novel Intraarticular CDC-like Kinase 2 and Dual-Specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1A Inhibitor and Wnt Pathway Modulator for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase II Randomized Trial, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • The evolution of nerve growth factor inhibition in clinical medicine, 2020, Nature Reviews Rheumatology
  • 2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis, 2023, Arthritis & Rheumatology

In their collaborations, Nancy E. Lane has worked frequently with several coauthors, including Michael C. Nevitt, J.A. Lynch, Peggy M. Cawthon, Charles E. McCulloch, and Gabby B. Joseph. The counts of coauthored publications with these collaborators are 41, 37, 32, 31, and 29 respectively.

Best Publications

  • Osteoarthritis: New Insights Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors

    D. T. Felson;R. C. Lawrence;P. A. Dieppe;R. Hirsch

  • Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis

    Nancy E. Lane

  • Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

    Marc C. Hochberg;Mark J. Prashker;Maria Greenwald;Rancho Mirage

  • Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: 2001 Update: American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

    L. Buckley;M. Greenwald;M. Hochberg;Nancy E Lane

  • Denosumab treatment effects on structural damage, bone mineral density, and bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial.

    Stanley B. Cohen;Robin K. Dore;Nancy E. Lane;Peter A. Ory

  • Parathyroid hormone treatment can reverse corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

    Nancy E. Lane;Sarah Sanchez;Gunnar W. Modin;Harry K. Genant

  • Tanezumab for the Treatment of Pain from Osteoarthritis of the Knee

    Nancy E. Lane;Thomas J. Schnitzer;Charles A. Birbara;Masoud Mokhtarani

  • Two-year effects of alendronate on bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in patients receiving glucocorticoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial.

    Jonathan D. Adachi;Kenneth G. Saag;Pierre D. Delmas;Uri A. Liberman

  • 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

    Lenore Buckley;Gordon Guyatt;Howard A. Fink;Michael Cannon

  • The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group

    E. S. Siris;R. Adler;J. Bilezikian;M. Bolognese

  • Thiazolidinedione use and bone loss in older diabetic adults.

    Ann V. Schwartz;Deborah E. Sellmeyer;Eric Vittinghoff;Lisa Palermo

  • Osteoarthritis: MR imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findings.

    Thomas M. Link;Lynne S. Steinbach;Srinka Ghosh;Michael Ries

  • Athletics and Osteoarthritis

    Joseph A. Buckwalter;Nancy E. Lane

  • 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: ACR GUIDELINE FOR GLUCOCORTICOID-INDUCED OSTEOPOROSIS PREVENTION AND TREATMENT

    Lenore Buckley;Gordon Guyatt;Howard A. Fink;Michael Cannon

  • Classification of osteoarthritis biomarkers: a proposed approach

    D. C. Bauer;D. J. Hunter;S. B. Abramson;M. Attur

  • OARSI-FDA initiative: Defining the disease state of osteoarthritis

    Nancy E Lane;K. Brandt;G. Hawker;E. Peeva

  • Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density

    Michael C. Nevitt;Nancy E. Lane;Jean C. Scott;Marc C. Hochberg

  • Glucocorticoid-Treated Mice Have Localized Changes in Trabecular Bone Material Properties and Osteocyte Lacunar Size That Are Not Observed in Placebo-Treated or Estrogen-Deficient Mice†

    Nancy E Lane;Wei Yao;Mehdi Balooch;Ravi K Nalla

  • Long-distance running, bone density, and osteoarthritis

    Nancy E. Lane;Daniel A. Bloch;Henry H. Jones;William H. Marshall

  • Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans

    Tomasz Wilmanski;Christian Diener;Noa Rappaport;Sushmita Patwardhan

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael C. Nevitt
Michael C. Nevitt University of California, San Francisco
Thomas M. Link
Thomas M. Link University of California, San Francisco
Eric S. Orwoll
Eric S. Orwoll Oregon Health & Science University
Peggy M. Cawthon
Peggy M. Cawthon University of California, San Francisco
Marc C. Hochberg
Marc C. Hochberg University of Maryland, Baltimore
Kristine E. Ensrud
Kristine E. Ensrud University of Minnesota
Charles E. McCulloch
Charles E. McCulloch University of California, San Francisco
John A. Lynch
John A. Lynch University of California, San Francisco
Jane A. Cauley
Jane A. Cauley University of Pittsburgh
David T. Felson
David T. Felson Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and supplementary education pathways is vital for those considering a career in medicine. Many students choose online health degrees to gain experience, balance work, or prepare for advanced clinical roles. Prospective nurses can easily find flexible and affordable online nurse practitioner programs to advance their credentials and expand career options.

For those just starting out, attending an online nursing school can be a practical and cost-effective entry into the healthcare sector. Registered nurses seeking higher responsibility or advancement might consider the cheapest rn to bsn program online, which opens the door to new opportunities and specialties.

Ambitious professionals aiming for leadership, research, or academic roles in nursing should explore online nursing doctoral programs. Each of these pathways helps build healthcare expertise, foster professional growth, and address the ongoing demand for skilled practitioners in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy E. Lane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles