World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7934 7404 360 347 140 6583

Nina Kupper publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nina Kupper between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nina Kupper published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2013. 29 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2013. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 13 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications
2002 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nina Kupper: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 7
2006 4
2007 12
2008 1
2009 13
2010 11
2011 8
2012 7
2013 15
2014 8
2015 4
2016 9
2017 4
2018 8
2019 3
2020 7
2021 12
2022 7
2023 14
2024 15
2025 14
Total 190
Download as CSV

Nina Kupper publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Kupper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nina Kupper D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Kupper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nina Kupper is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields predominantly within Medicine and Psychology, with a specific focus on areas such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work explores diverse topics including:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health, psychology, and well-being

Frequently publishing in scholarly journals, Nina Kupper has contributed multiple articles to venues such as:

  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • General Hospital Psychiatry
  • Psychosomatic Medicine
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Type D Personality as a Risk Factor for Adverse Outcome in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Patient-Data Meta-analysis" (2023, Psychosomatic Medicine)
  • "Emotion regulation in social interaction: Physiological and emotional responses associated with social inhibition" (2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology)
  • "Dairy product consumption and incident prediabetes in Dutch middle-aged adults: the Hoorn Studies prospective cohort" (2021, European Journal of Nutrition)
  • "Dairy Product Consumption and Incident Prediabetes in the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study With 12 Years of Follow-Up" (2023, Journal of Nutrition)
  • "A systematic review comparing two popular methods to assess a Type D personality effect" (2021, General Hospital Psychiatry)

In their collaborative work, Nina Kupper often coauthors with the following researchers:

  • Jos Widdershoven
  • Stefanie Duijndam
  • Paul Lodder
  • Annemiek Karreman
  • Paula M.C. Mommersteeg

Best Publications

  • Netherlands Twin Register: A Focus on Longitudinal Research

    Dorret I. Boomsma;Jacqueline M. Vink;Toos C. E .M. van Beijsterveldt;Eco J. C. de Geus

  • Does emotional stress cause type 2 diabetes mellitus?: A review from the European Depression in Diabetes (EDID) Research Consortium

    Frans Pouwer;Nina Kupper;Marcel C Adriaanse

  • Differential association of somatic and cognitive symptoms of depression and anxiety with inflammation: Findings from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

    Hester E. Duivis;Nicole Vogelzangs;Nina Kupper;Peter de Jonge;Peter de Jonge

  • Netherlands Twin Register: A Focus on Longitudinal Research.

    Janine Stubbe;Dorret I. Boomsma;Jacqueline M. Vink;Toos C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt

  • Heritability of Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure in an Extended Twin Design

    Nina Kupper;Gonneke Willemsen;Harriëtte Riese;Daniëlle Posthuma

  • Normative data of the SF-12 health survey with validation using postmyocardial infarction patients in the Dutch population.

    Floortje Mols;Aline J. Pelle;Nina Kupper

  • Type D Personality as a Prognostic Factor in Heart Disease: Assessment and Mediating Mechanisms

    Nina Kupper;Johan Denollet

  • Type D Personality as a Risk Factor in Coronary Heart Disease: a Review of Current Evidence

    Nina Kupper;Johan Denollet

  • Familial influences on basal salivary cortisol in an adult population.

    Nina Kupper;Eco J.C. de Geus;Mireille van den Berg;Clemens Kirschbaum

  • Type-D personality is a stable taxonomy in post-MI patients over an 18-month period.

    Elisabeth J. Martens;Nina Kupper;Susanne S. Pedersen;Annelies E. Aquarius

  • Heritability and stability of resting blood pressure

    Jouke-Jan Hottenga;Dorret I. Boomsma;Nina Kupper;Danielle Posthuma

  • Heritability of ambulatory heart rate variability.

    Nina H.M. Kupper;Gonneke Willemsen;Mireille van den Berg;Dolf de Boer

  • Cross-cultural analysis of Type D (distressed) personality in 6222 patients with ischemic heart disease: A study from the International HeartQoL Project

    Nina Kupper;Susanne S. Pedersen;Stefan Höfer;Hugo Saner

  • Type D personality is associated with increased metabolic syndrome prevalence and an unhealthy lifestyle in a cross-sectional Dutch community sample.

    Paula M C Mommersteeg;Nina Kupper;Johan Denollet

  • Psychological Determinants of Heart Failure Self-Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Dionne Kessing;Johan Denollet;Jos Widdershoven;Nina Kupper

  • Psychophysiological biomarkers explaining the association between depression and prognosis in coronary artery patients : A critical review of the literature

    Peter de Jonge;Peter de Jonge;Judith G.M. Rosmalen;Ido P. Kema;Bennard Doornbos

  • Depression and anxiety as predictors of heart rate variability after myocardial infarction.

    E. J. Martens;I. Nyklíček;B. M. Szabó;N. Kupper

  • Large-scale ensemble averaging of ambulatory impedance cardiograms

    Harrië Tte Riese;Paul F. C. Groot;Mireille Van Den Berg;Nina H. M. Kupper

  • Nine-Year Stability of Type D Personality: Contributions of Genes and Environment

    Nina Kupper;Dorret I. Boomsma;Eco J. C. de Geus;Johan Denollet

  • Association between type D personality, depression, and oxidative stress in patients with chronic heart failure.

    Nina Kupper;Yori Gidron;Jobst Winter;Johan Denollet

  • Heritability and Stability of Resting Blood Pressure

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Denollet
Johan Denollet Tilburg University
Gonneke Willemsen
Gonneke Willemsen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark
Eco J. C. de Geus
Eco J. C. de Geus Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter de Jonge
Peter de Jonge University of Groningen
Danielle Posthuma
Danielle Posthuma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harriette Riese
Harriette Riese University Medical Center Groningen
Ivan Nyklíček
Ivan Nyklíček Tilburg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including substance abuse counseling—a rapidly growing field. If you’re interested in helping individuals overcome addiction, online programs offer flexible pathways toward this vital profession.

Requirements to become a counselor vary by location. For example, learn more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Dallas, where state and city credentialing is essential. In Denver, students must meet Denver substance abuse counselors education requirements, which can include supervised experience and specialized coursework.

Each city may present unique steps. To understand specific state and local standards, read about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Detroit, as well as Durham substance abuse counselor certification requirements.

Researching these pathways ensures you choose the right online degree and prepare for a meaningful, impactful career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Nina Kupper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles