World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7102 6619 3839 3487 73 13732

Elaine A. Leventhal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elaine A. Leventhal between 1984 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elaine A. Leventhal published across 36 years, from 1984 to 2019, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2008. 2 of the 78 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2008. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication
1984 2019

78 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elaine A. Leventhal: publications per year, 1984 to 2019
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 4
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 5
2008 7
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 3
2013 6
2014 1
2015 2
2016 2
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
Total 78
Download as CSV

Elaine A. Leventhal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine A. Leventhal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 73
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elaine A. Leventhal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine A. Leventhal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elaine A. Leventhal is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. They have developed their academic career and research activity within this institution.

Although specific details about their recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not listed, the professional association with Rutgers provides context for the scope of their academic involvement.

There are no recorded entries regarding the main fields of study, subfields, or particular research topics associated with Elaine A. Leventhal at this time.

No book publications or awards have been documented in the available data.

The dataset indicates the scientist is currently living, which allows present-tense references regarding their career and affiliations.

Best Publications

  • Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions

    Howard Leventhal;Michael Diefenbach;Elaine A. Leventhal

  • Illness representations: Theoretical foundations.

    Howard Leventhal;Yael Benyamini;Susan Brownlee;Michael Diefenbach

  • Self-regulation, health, and behavior: A perceptual-cognitive approach

    Howard Leventhal;Elaine A. Leventhal;Richard J. Contrada

  • Positive Affect and Function as Influences on Self-Assessments of Health Expanding Our View Beyond Illness and Disability

    Yael Benyamini;Ellen L. Idler;Howard Leventhal;Elaine A. Leventhal

  • Symptom representations and affect as determinants of care seeking in a community-dwelling, adult sample population.

    Linda Cameron;Elaine A. Leventhal;Howard Leventhal

  • Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health.

    Yael Benyamini;Elaine A. Leventhal;Howard Leventhal

  • Self-rated oral health as an independent predictor of self-rated general health, self-esteem and life satisfaction

    Yael Benyamini;Howard Leventhal;E A Elaine A Leventhal

  • Health Psychology: The Search for Pathways between Behavior and Health

    Howard Leventhal;John Weinman;Elaine A. Leventhal;L. Alison Phillips

  • Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients: older is wiser.

    Denise C. Park;Christopher Hertzog;Howard Leventhal;Roger W. Morrell

  • Using the common sense model to design interventions for the prevention and management of chronic illness threats: From description to process

    Lisa M. McAndrew;Tamara J. Musumeci-Szabó;Pablo A. Mora;Loretta Vileikyte;Loretta Vileikyte

  • Seeking medical care in response to symptoms and life stress.

    Linda Cameron;Elaine A. Leventhal;Howard Leventhal

  • Self-assessments of health: What do people know that predicts their mortality?

    Yael Benyamini;Elaine A. Leventhal;Howard Leventhal

  • Health practices and illness cognition in young, middle aged, and elderly adults.

    Thomas R. Prohaska;Elaine A. Leventhal;Howard Leventhal;Mary L. Keller

  • Age, symptom interpretation, and health behavior

    Elaine A. Leventhal;Thomas R. Prohaska

  • Elderly people's ratings of the importance of health-related factors to their self-assessments of health.

    Yael Benyamini;Yael Benyamini;Elaine A Leventhal;Howard Leventhal

  • In Sickness but Not in Health: Self-ratings, Identity, and Mortality∗:

    Ellen Idler;Howard Leventhal;Julie Mclaughlin;Elaine Leventhal

  • Population Risk, Actual Risk, Perceived Risk, and Cancer Control: a Discussion

    Howard Leventhal;Kim Kelly;Elaine A. Leventhal

  • Impact of symptoms and aging attribution on emotions and coping.

    Thomas R. Prohaska;Mary L. Keller;Elaine A. Leventhal;Howard Leventhal

  • Cognitive Science Speaks to the “Common-Sense” of Chronic Illness Management

    Howard Leventhal;Elaine A. Leventhal;Jessica Y. Breland

  • Giving Up and Replacing Activities in Response to Illness

    Jennifer Duke;Howard Leventhal;Susan Brownlee;Elaine A. Leventhal

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard Leventhal
Howard Leventhal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Yael Benyamini
Yael Benyamini Tel Aviv University
Michael A. Diefenbach
Michael A. Diefenbach Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Linda D. Cameron
Linda D. Cameron University of California, Merced
Richard J. Contrada
Richard J. Contrada Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ellen L. Idler
Ellen L. Idler Emory University
Gretchen B. Chapman
Gretchen B. Chapman Carnegie Mellon University
Ethan A. Halm
Ethan A. Halm The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Keith J. Petrie
Keith J. Petrie University of Auckland
Mark A. Sager
Mark A. Sager University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in psychology, there are diverse online degree options and career paths to consider. Choosing the right program depends on factors like location, affordability, flexibility, and career objectives. Fast-tracked programs can help students earn credentials quickly and enter the workforce sooner. For example, students seeking to complete their education rapidly can explore the fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in Texas.

Affordability is also a top priority for many students. If cost is a concern, looking into the most affordable counseling degree programs in Arizona may help you find budget-friendly options without sacrificing quality. Urban areas like California and Massachusetts also offer competitive, accessible programs — see affordable counseling programs in both Berkeley and Boston.

Online psychology and counseling degrees open doors to roles in mental health, education, human resources, and more. Understanding the available options allows you to tailor your studies and career pathway to your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Elaine A. Leventhal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles