World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
21197
World Ranking
6513
National Ranking
3529

Michael A. Diefenbach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Diefenbach sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael A. Diefenbach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Diefenbach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Diefenbach is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their primary research contributions are focused within the field of Medicine, encompassing 128 publications. Key subfields of study include General Health Professions, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, such as:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Psycho-Oncology

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael A. Diefenbach cover a range of topics and include:

  • Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area, 2020, JAMA
  • Management of Distress in Patients with Cancer-Are We Doing the Right Thing?, 2020, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Toward a theoretical understanding of young female cancer survivors' decision-making about family-building post-treatment, 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • "Looking at future cancer survivors, give them a roadmap": addressing fertility and family-building topics in post-treatment cancer survivorship care, 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health, 2022, Translational Behavioral Medicine

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include:

  • Allison Marziliano
  • Suzanne M. Miller
  • Liron Sinvani
  • Catherine Benedict
  • Jennifer S. Ford

Best Publications

  • Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area.

    Safiya Richardson;Safiya Richardson;Jamie S. Hirsch;Jamie S. Hirsch;Mangala Narasimhan;James M. Crawford

  • Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions

    Howard Leventhal;Michael Diefenbach;Elaine A. Leventhal

  • Illness representations: Theoretical foundations.

    Howard Leventhal;Yael Benyamini;Susan Brownlee;Michael Diefenbach

  • The Common-Sense Model of Illness Representation: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

    Michael A. Diefenbach;Howard Leventhal

  • Interventions to Address Sexual Problems in People With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Adaptation of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline

    Jeanne Carter;Christina Lacchetti;Barbara L. Andersen;Debra L. Barton

  • The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences.

    Ellen Peters;Isaac Lipkus;Michael A. Diefenbach

  • The Active Side of Illness Cognition

    Howard Leventhal;Michael Diefenbach

  • Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility

    Michael A. Diefenbach;Neil D. Weinstein;Joseph O'Reilly

  • The Relationship Between Uncertainty and Affect.

    Eric C. Anderson;Eric C. Anderson;R. Nicholas Carleton;Michael Diefenbach;Paul K. J. Han;Paul K. J. Han

  • Specific worry about breast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

    Michael A. Diefenbach;Suzanne M. Miller;Mary B. Daly

  • Perceptions of Patients and Physicians Regarding Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: Implications for Physician-Patient Communication

    Neal J. Meropol;Kevin P. Weinfurt;Caroline B. Burnett;Andrew Balshem

  • Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Interventions for Elevated Depressive Symptoms in Adults Diagnosed With Cancer

    Stacey L. Hart;Michael A. Hoyt;Michael Diefenbach;Derek R. Anderson

  • Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life.

    Neal J. Meropol;Brian L. Egleston;Joanne S. Buzaglo;Al B. Benson

  • Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers.

    Sirisha Jonnalagadda;Cara Bergamo;Jenny J. Lin;Linda Lurslurchachai

  • Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer.

    Michael A Diefenbach;Jenevie Dorsey;Robert G Uzzo;Gerald E Hanks

  • Presurgery Psychological Factors Predict Pain, Nausea, and Fatigue One Week After Breast Cancer Surgery

    Guy H. Montgomery;Julie B. Schnur;Joel Erblich;Michael A. Diefenbach

  • Regret of Treatment Decision and its Association with Disease-Specific Quality of Life Following Prostate Cancer Treatment

    Michael A. Diefenbach;Nihal E. Mohamed

  • The perceived sensitivity to medicines (PSM) scale: An evaluation of validity and reliability

    Rob Horne;Kate Faasse;Vanessa Cooper;Michael A. Diefenbach

  • Negative affect and self-report of physical symptoms: Two longitudinal studies of older adults.

    Elaine A. Leventhal;Stephen Hansell;Michael Diefenbach;Howard Leventhal

  • Recruitment via social media: advantages and potential biases.

    Catherine Benedict;Alexandria L Hahn;Michael A Diefenbach;Jennifer S Ford

  • Muscle invasive bladder cancer: examining survivor burden and unmet needs.

    Nihal E. Mohamed;Phapichaya Chaoprang Herrera;Shawna Hudson;Tracey A. Revenson

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzanne M. Miller
Suzanne M. Miller Fox Chase Cancer Center
Howard Leventhal
Howard Leventhal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Elaine A. Leventhal
Elaine A. Leventhal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Carol R. Horowitz
Carol R. Horowitz Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Paul F. Engstrom
Paul F. Engstrom Fox Chase Cancer Center
Ellen Peters
Ellen Peters University of Oregon
Annette L. Stanton
Annette L. Stanton University of California, Los Angeles
Mary B. Daly
Mary B. Daly Fox Chase Cancer Center
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Neal J. Meropol
Neal J. Meropol Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology unlocks diverse online degrees and career pathways, particularly in the growing field of mental health counseling. For those interested in supporting individuals and communities, a career as a mental health counselor can be highly rewarding and impactful.

Each state and city may have specific educational and licensure requirements. For example, those exploring Seattle mental health counselor education requirements will find a focus on accredited psychology or counseling programs, supervised clinical experience, and successful completion of state exams.

Similar criteria apply elsewhere. Understanding Spokane mental health counselor education requirements and how to become a mental health counselor in St. Louis is vital for those planning to practice in these regions.

Online psychology degrees offer unmatched flexibility, making it easier to meet prerequisites and earn credentials from anywhere. To explore your own educational options, including state-specific paths like how to become a mental health counselor in St. Petersburg, research accredited online programs and local licensure requirements to jumpstart your career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Diefenbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles