World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 121 3532 3301 98 94 618 86429

Philip J. Barter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip J. Barter between 1970 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip J. Barter published across 55 years, from 1970 to 2024, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2009. 1 of the 624 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2009. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1970 2024

624 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip J. Barter: publications per year, 1970 to 2024
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 2
1972 4
1973 2
1974 3
1975 1
1976 1
1977 2
1978 2
1979 7
1980 6
1981 3
1982 9
1983 5
1984 8
1985 8
1986 5
1987 4
1988 3
1989 3
1990 9
1991 8
1992 3
1993 5
1994 10
1995 6
1996 6
1997 11
1998 8
1999 11
2000 11
2001 7
2002 10
2003 16
2004 16
2005 25
2006 35
2007 26
2008 20
2009 36
2010 26
2011 33
2012 30
2013 22
2014 33
2015 23
2016 27
2017 22
2018 19
2019 17
2020 9
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 624
Download as CSV

Philip J. Barter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Barter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 618 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 618
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip J. Barter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Barter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287 121
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip J. Barter is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and has produced research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their scholarly work spans subfields including Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research topics reflect a focus on Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins; Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health; Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases; Body Composition Measurement Techniques; Physical Activity and Health; Obesity and Health Practices; and Fatty Acid Research and Health.

Philip J. Barter's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity, 2020, Nature Reviews Endocrinology
  • Effect of High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Corn Oil on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk, 2020, JAMA
  • Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials, 2022, The Lancet
  • Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis, 2024, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Long-term safety and efficacy of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, 2021, European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Barter include John J.P. Kastelein, Wolfgang Köenig, Paul M. Ridker, Colin Baigent, and David Preiss, each contributing to several joint publications.

The scientist has published regularly in venues such as Lipids in Health and Disease, Nature Reviews Endocrinology, JAMA, The Lancet, and The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

Best Publications

  • Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels

    A. Tonkin;P. Alyward;D. Colquhoun;P. Glasziou

  • Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease.

    John C. LaRosa;Scott M Grundy;David D. Waters;Charles Shear

  • Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial.

    A Keech;R J Simes;P Barter;J Best

  • Effects of Torcetrapib in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Events

    Philip J. Barter;Mark Caulfield;Mats Eriksson;Scott M Grundy

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk

    Josée Dupuis;Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena;Richa Saxena

  • Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

    Gregory G. Schwartz;Anders G. Olsson;Markus Abt;Christie M. Ballantyne

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (vol 42, pg 105, 2010)

    J Dupuis;C Langenberg;I Prokopenko;R Saxena

  • HDL Cholesterol, Very Low Levels of LDL Cholesterol, and Cardiovascular Events

    Philip Barter;Antonio M. Gotto;John C. LaRosa;Jaman Maroni

  • Risk of Incident Diabetes With Intensive-Dose Compared With Moderate-Dose Statin Therapy A Meta-analysis

    David Preiss;Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai;Paul Welsh;Sabina A. Murphy

  • A genome-wide association search for type 2 diabetes genes in African Americans.

    N D Palmer;C W McDonough;P J Hicks;B H Roh

  • Antiinflammatory Properties of HDL

    Philip J. Barter;Stephen Nicholls;Kerry Anne Rye;G. M. Anantharamaiah

  • Effect of Two Intensive Statin Regimens on Progression of Coronary Disease

    Stephen J. Nicholls;Christie M. Ballantyne;Philip J. Barter;M. John Chapman

  • Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein: A Novel Target for Raising HDL and Inhibiting Atherosclerosis

    Philip J. Barter;H. Bryan Brewer;M. John Chapman;Charles H. Hennekens

  • High-Density Lipoproteins Inhibit Cytokine-Induced Expression of Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecules

    Gillian W. Cockerill;Kerry-Anne Rye;Jennifer R. Gamble;Mathew Alexander Vadas

  • International Day for the Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity (IDEA): a study of waist circumference, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus in 168,000 primary care patients in 63 countries.

    Beverley Balkau;John E. Deanfield;Jean Pierre Després;Jean Pierre Bassand

  • Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement

    Ian J. Neeland;Robert Ross;Jean Pierre Després;Yuji Matsuzawa

  • Erratum: New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (Nature Genetics (2010) 42 (105-116))

    Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena

  • Effect of Two Intensive Statin Regimens on Progression of Coronary Disease

    Nicholls Sj;Ballantyne Cm;Barter Pj;Chapman Mj

  • Intensive Lipid Lowering With Atorvastatin in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease

    J.C. LaRosa;S.M. Grundy;D.D. Waters

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerry-Anne Rye
Kerry-Anne Rye University of New South Wales
Stephen J. Nicholls
Stephen J. Nicholls Monash University
John J.P. Kastelein
John J.P. Kastelein University of Amsterdam
Anthony C. Keech
Anthony C. Keech University of Sydney
Christie M. Ballantyne
Christie M. Ballantyne Baylor College of Medicine
Scott M. Grundy
Scott M. Grundy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
David D. Waters
David D. Waters University of California, San Francisco
David S. Celermajer
David S. Celermajer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Marja-Riitta Taskinen
Marja-Riitta Taskinen University of Helsinki
Dawn M. Waterworth
Dawn M. Waterworth Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn’t always mean following the traditional path of becoming a physician. There are several flexible, rewarding, and growing healthcare careers available through online study—ideal for those who need to balance work, family, and education. For example, earning a nursing degree online can open doors to roles in hospitals, clinics, and community health settings, often with lower tuition costs and flexible scheduling.

For nurses looking to advance, online doctoral programs are more accessible than ever. The cheapest dnp online program options let you reach the highest level of clinical expertise without the burden of excessive student debt. If you are already a registered nurse (RN), the average cost of rn to bsn programs can be a key factor as you consider moving your qualifications to the next level and expanding your career opportunities.

Even those without previous nursing experience can enter fast-growing advanced practice fields. Direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online allow ambitious students from other backgrounds to transition into high-demand healthcare roles. Exploring these alternative online pathways can provide a flexible, affordable route to rewarding medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Barter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles