World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 50 10220 9868 181 171 251 9251

David W. Shoesmith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David W. Shoesmith between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David W. Shoesmith published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2006. 15 of the 333 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2006. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

333 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David W. Shoesmith: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 3
1979 0
1980 4
1981 0
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 6
1995 0
1996 4
1997 4
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 0
2002 4
2003 3
2004 10
2005 11
2006 29
2007 22
2008 9
2009 7
2010 21
2011 11
2012 19
2013 18
2014 18
2015 15
2016 7
2017 20
2018 7
2019 9
2020 10
2021 9
2022 6
2023 10
2024 6
2025 9
Total 333
Download as CSV

David W. Shoesmith publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Shoesmith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 250–269 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 251 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723
150–169 835
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726 251
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

David W. Shoesmith D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Shoesmith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612
48–49 598
50–51 657 50
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David W. Shoesmith is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research portfolio is centered on the fields of Materials Science and Engineering, with notable contributions specifically in Materials Chemistry, Metals and Alloys, Civil and Structural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering.

Their work extensively covers topics related to corrosion behavior and inhibition, hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals, nuclear materials and properties, concrete corrosion and durability, high-temperature coating behaviors, radioactive element chemistry and processing, and metal extraction and bioleaching.

Some of the recent papers authored in collaboration with other researchers include:

  • The contribution of Cr and Mo to the passivation of Ni22Cr and Ni22Cr10Mo alloys in sulfuric acid, 2020, Corrosion Science
  • Investigating the Role of Mo and Cr during the Activation and Passivation of Ni-Based Alloys in Acidic Chloride Solution, 2021, Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • A comparison of the corrosion behaviour of copper materials in dilute nitric acid, 2021, Corrosion Science
  • Corrosion Behaviour of Electron Beam Melted Ti6Al4V: Effects of Microstructural Variation, 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • Hydrogen peroxide decomposition on simulated nuclear fuel bicarbonate/carbonate solutions, 2020, Electrochimica Acta

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • James J. Noël
  • Mehran Behazin
  • Dmitrij Zagidulin
  • Jeffrey D. Henderson
  • Christina Lilja

David W. Shoesmith's works have been published in various venues, with a concentration in:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • Corrosion Science
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • Materials and Corrosion
  • Electrochimica Acta

Best Publications

  • Electrochemical Techniques in Corrosion Science and Engineering

    Robert G. Kelly;John R. Scully;David Shoesmith;Rudolph G. Buchheit

  • Chemical information from XPS—applications to the analysis of electrode surfaces

    N. S. McIntyre;S. Sunder;D. W. Shoesmith;F. W. Stanchell

  • Raman spectroscopic studies of defect structures and phase transition in hyper-stoichiometric UO2+x

    Heming He;David Shoesmith

  • Corrosion properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings on an aluminium alloy – The effect of the PEO process stage

    Vahid Dehnavi;David W. Shoesmith;Ben Li Luan;Ben Li Luan;Mehdi Yari

  • Effects of Temperature and Potential on the Passive Corrosion Properties of Alloys C22 and C276

    A. C. Lloyd;D. W. Shoesmith;N. S. McIntyre;J. J. Noël

  • Correlation between plasma electrolytic oxidation treatment stages and coating microstructure on aluminum under unipolar pulsed DC mode

    Vahid Dehnavi;Ben Li Luan;Ben Li Luan;Xing Yang Liu;David W. Shoesmith

  • Characterization of film properties on the NiCrMo Alloy C-2000

    Xiangrong Zhang;Dmitrij Zagidulin;David W. Shoesmith

  • Anodic oxidation of UO2

    S. Sunder;D.W. Shoesmith;M.G. Bailey;F.W. Stanchell

  • CORROSION OF COPPER-COATED STEEL HIGH LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE CONTAINERS UNDER PERMANENT DISPOSAL CONDITIONS

    Thalia Standish;Jian Chen;Rebecca Jacklin;Pellumb Jakupi

  • Influence of temperature on passive film properties on Ni–Cr–Mo Alloy C-2000

    Xiangrong Zhang;David W. Shoesmith

  • The role of aluminum distribution on the local corrosion resistance of the microstructure in a sand-cast AM50 alloy

    Mohsen Danaie;Robert Matthew Asmussen;Pellumb Jakupi;David W. Shoesmith

  • Electrochemical behaviour of iron in alkaline sulphide solutions

    Unknown

  • The Electrochemical Response of Preoxidized Copper in Aqueous Sulfide Solutions

    Unknown

  • Influence of Trivalent-Dopants on the Structural and Electrochemical Properties of Uranium Dioxide (UO2)

    Mayuri Razdan;David W. Shoesmith

  • Radiation induced dissolution of UO2 based nuclear fuel – A critical review of predictive modelling approaches

    Trygve E. Eriksen;David W. Shoesmith;Mats Jonsson

  • Characterization of commercially cold sprayed copper coatings and determination of the effects of impacting copper powder velocities

    Unknown

  • Analyzing the Influence of Alloying Elements and Impurities on the Localized Reactivity of Titanium Grade-7 by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

    Renkang Zhu;Ziqiang Qin;James J. Noël;David W. Shoesmith

  • Molybdenum surface enrichment and release during transpassive dissolution of Ni-based alloys

    Jeffrey D. Henderson;Xuejie Li;David W. Shoesmith;James J. Noël

  • Insights into Grain Structures and Their Reactivity on Grade-2 Ti Alloy Surfaces by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

    Renkang Zhu;Catherine Nowierski;Zhifeng Ding;and James J. Noël

  • The open-circuit ennoblement of alloy C-22 and other Ni-Cr-Mo alloys

    A. C. Lloydis;J. J. Noël;D. W. Shoesmith;N. S. McIntyre

  • The cathodic behaviour of Al–Mn precipitates during atmospheric and saline aqueous corrosion of a sand-cast AM50 alloy

    Mohsen Danaie;Robert Matthew Asmussen;Pellumb Jakupi;David W. Shoesmith

  • Mechanisms of Film Growth on Copper in Aqueous Solutions Containing Sulphide and Chloride under Voltammetric Conditions

    Taylor Martino;Raheleh Partovi-Nia;Jian Chen;Ziqiang Qin

  • Characterization of the influence of fission product doping on the anodic reactivity of uranium dioxide

    Heming He;Peter G Keech;Michael E Broczkowski;James J Noël

  • Tracking the corrosion of magnesium sand cast AM50 alloy in chloride environments

    R. Matthew Asmussen;Pellumb Jakupi;Mohsen Danaie;Gianluigi A. Botton

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhifeng Ding
Zhifeng Ding University of Western Ontario
Philippe Marcus
Philippe Marcus Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Sohrab Rohani
Sohrab Rohani University of Western Ontario
John R. Scully
John R. Scully University of Virginia
Gianluigi A. Botton
Gianluigi A. Botton McMaster University
Gerald S. Frankel
Gerald S. Frankel The Ohio State University
Mats Jonsson
Mats Jonsson Royal Institute of Technology
Robert Lindsay
Robert Lindsay University of Glasgow
Hiroki Habazaki
Hiroki Habazaki Hokkaido University
Vincent Maurice
Vincent Maurice Chimie ParisTech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David W. Shoesmith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles