World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
25526
World Ranking
4263
National Ranking
2086

Kim Anh Do publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Anh Do sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 306 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kim Anh Do D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Anh Do sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Tumor Microbiome Diversity and Composition Influence Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes

    Erick Riquelme;Erick Riquelme;Yu Zhang;Liangliang Zhang;Maria Montiel

  • Analyzing Microarray Gene Expression Data

    Geoffrey J. McLachlan;Kim-Anh Do;Christophe Ambroise

  • Long-term results of the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Constantine S. Tam;Susan O'Brien;William Wierda;Hagop Kantarjian

  • Simplified Staging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Jean Nicolas Vauthey;Gregory Y. Lauwers;Nestor F. Esnaola;Kim Anh Do

  • Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: Methodology and clinical associations

    Jean-Nicolas Vauthey;Amin Souleiman Chaoui;Kim-Anh Do;Malcolm M. Bilimoria

  • Steps toward mapping the human vasculature by phage display

    Wadih Arap;Mikhail G. Kolonin;Martin Trepel;Johanna Lahdenranta

  • Chemoimmunotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    William Wierda;Susan O'Brien;Sijin Wen;Stefan Faderl

  • Incidence and Outcome of BRCA Mutations in Unselected Patients with Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

    Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo;Kirsten M. Timms;Shuying Liu;Huiqin Chen

  • Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults

    Jean Nicolas Vauthey;Eddie K. Abdalla;Dorota A. Doherty;Philippe Gertsch

  • CD38 expression as an important prognostic factor in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Sherif Ibrahim;Michael Keating;Kim Anh Do;Susan O'Brien

  • Morphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication errors

    J. R. Jass;Kim-Anh Do;L. A. Simms;H. Iino

  • Phase I trials using Sleeping Beauty to generate CD19-specific CAR T cells

    Partow Kebriaei;Harjeet Singh;M. Helen Huls;Matthew J. Figliola

  • Prognostic nomogram and index for overall survival in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    William G. Wierda;Susan O'Brien;Xuemei Wang;Stefan Faderl

  • Fingerprinting the circulating repertoire of antibodies from cancer patients

    Paul J. Mintz;Jeri Kim;Kim Anh Do;Xuemei Wang

  • Presalvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time as predictors of biochemical failure of salvage cryotherapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy.

    Philippe E. Spiess;Andrew K. Lee;Dan Leibovici;Xuemei Wang

  • Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Richter's Syndrome Treated With Chemotherapy or Chemoimmunotherapy With or Without Stem-Cell Transplantation

    Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou;Susan O'Brien;Issa Khouri;Francis J. Giles

  • PRUNE2 is a human prostate cancer suppressor regulated by the intronic long noncoding RNA PCA3

    Ahmad Salameh;Alessandro K. Lee;Marina Cardó-Vila;Diana N. Nunes

  • Circulating CD20 is detectable in the plasma of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is of prognostic significance

    Taghi Manshouri;Kim Anh Do;Xuemei Wang;Francis J. Giles

  • Underlying liver disease, not tumor factors, predicts long-term survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Malcolm M. Bilimoria;Gregory Y. Lauwers;Dorota A. Doherty;David M. Nagorney

  • PIK3CA/PTEN Mutations and Akt Activation As Markers of Sensitivity to Allosteric mTOR Inhibitors

    Funda Meric-Bernstam;Argun Akcakanat;Huiqin Chen;Kim Anh Do

Frequent Co-Authors

Xuemei Wang
Xuemei Wang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gordon B. Mills
Gordon B. Mills Oregon Health & Science University
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Funda Meric-Bernstam The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Hagop M. Kantarjian
Hagop M. Kantarjian The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Melissa L. Bondy
Melissa L. Bondy Stanford University
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Aysegul A. Sahin
Aysegul A. Sahin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Guillermo Garcia-Manero The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Susan O'Brien
Susan O'Brien University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, a variety of related online degrees and career pathways are available to expand your skillset and future opportunities. Many students choose to complement their studies with applied health sciences, information management, or specialized technical roles.

For those intrigued by healthcare administration, consider health information management online programs, which teach you to handle sensitive medical records using the latest technology. Careers like medical coding are also in demand—before deciding, learn more about is medical coding a good job to weigh the pros and cons.

Biochemistry or nutrition majors might also pursue advanced credentials. Explore a nutrition masters online to deepen your expertise or qualify for specialized positions in the growing wellness industry.

Interested in diagnostic technology? There are excellent options for those wanting to become ultrasound technicians, with flexible learning pathways. Discover a variety of programs at ultrasound tech school to find the best fit for your schedule and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Kim Anh Do

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles