World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marina Milyavskaya

Marina Milyavskaya

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9847 9216 675 634 127 5344

Marina Milyavskaya publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marina Milyavskaya between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marina Milyavskaya published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2018. 21 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2018. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
2009 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marina Milyavskaya: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 2
2011 3
2012 4
2013 6
2014 7
2015 13
2016 13
2017 14
2018 25
2019 8
2020 10
2021 13
2022 11
2023 9
2024 10
2025 11
Total 161
Download as CSV

Marina Milyavskaya publications per year - data summary

  • Marina Milyavskaya, a Psychology scholar from Carleton University, has 161 publications recorded across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2009 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2009 and 2010, with 2 publications each.
  • The rate of publication averages 9.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.5 per year counting only the 17 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 54 publications, 34% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2009-2014: 24 publications (4.0 per year); 2015-2020: 83 publications (13.8 per year); 2021-2025: 54 publications (10.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marina Milyavskaya publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Milyavskaya sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marina Milyavskaya publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Marina Milyavskaya, a Psychology scholar from Carleton University, records 127 publications - the 37th percentile of the discipline.
  • 37% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Marina Milyavskaya, and about 63% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Marina Milyavskaya ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Marina Milyavskaya D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Milyavskaya sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Marina Milyavskaya D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Marina Milyavskaya, a Psychology scholar from Carleton University, records 35 D-Index - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Marina Milyavskaya, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Marina Milyavskaya ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Marina Milyavskaya is affiliated with Carleton University in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with notable contributions across several subfields including applied psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science.

The main topics investigated in their work include behavioral health and interventions, motivation and self-concept in sports, mental health research topics, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, psychological and temporal perspectives research, social and intergroup psychology, and death anxiety and social exclusion.

Among recent publications, several papers illustrate the range of their research interests:

  • A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect, 2021, Psychological Science
  • Self-control in daily life: Prevalence and effectiveness of diverse self-control strategies, 2020, Journal of Personality
  • More Effort, Less Fatigue: The Role of Interest in Increasing Effort and Reducing Mental Fatigue, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Do mindful people set better goals? Investigating the relation between trait mindfulness, self-concordance, and goal progress, 2020, Journal of Research in Personality
  • The relation of parental support of emerging adults' goals to well-being over time: The mediating roles of goal progress and autonomy need satisfaction, 2020, Motivation Science

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Kaitlyn M. Werner
  • Tyler Thorne
  • Isabelle Leduc-Cummings
  • Michael Inzlicht
  • Blair Saunders

Their work appears regularly in certain publication venues with multiple contributions to the following journals:

  • Carleton undergraduate journal of science
  • Motivation Science
  • Journal of Personality
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Research in Personality

Best Publications

  • Psychological needs, motivation, and well-being: A test of self-determination theory across multiple domains

    Marina Milyavskaya;Richard Koestner

  • Fear of missing out: prevalence, dynamics, and consequences of experiencing FOMO

    Marina Milyavskaya;Mark Saffran;Nora Hope;Richard Koestner

  • Saying "no" to temptation: Want-to motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control.

    Marina Milyavskaya;Michael Inzlicht;Nora Hope;Richard Koestner

  • Balance Across Contexts: Importance of Balanced Need Satisfaction Across Various Life Domains

    Marina Milyavskaya;Isabelle Gingras;Geneviève A. Mageau;Richard Koestner

  • What’s So Great About Self-Control? Examining the Importance of Effortful Self-Control and Temptation in Predicting Real-Life Depletion and Goal Attainment:

    Marina Milyavskaya;Michael Inzlicht

  • A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect:

    Kathleen D. Vohs;Brandon J. Schmeichel;Sophie Lohmann;Sophie Lohmann;Quentin F. Gronau

  • Some goals just feel easier: Self-concordance leads to goal progress through subjective ease, not effort ☆

    Kaitlyn M. Werner;Marina Milyavskaya;Emily Foxen-Craft;Richard Koestner

  • The Role of Self-Compassion in Goal Pursuit and Well-Being Among University Freshmen

    Nora Hope;Richard Koestner;Marina Milyavskaya

  • Reward sensitivity following boredom and cognitive effort: A high-powered neurophysiological investigation

    Marina Milyavskaya;Michael Inzlicht;Travis Johnson;Michael J. Larson

  • Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A Bayesian analysis

    Blair Saunders;Marina Milyavskaya;Alexander Etz;Daniel Randles

  • Psychological need satisfaction across levels of experience: Their organization and contribution to general well-being

    Marina Milyavskaya;Frederick L. Philippe;Richard Koestner

  • The Effects of Self-Criticism and Self-Oriented Perfectionism on Goal Pursuit

    Theodore A. Powers;Richard Koestner;David C. Zuroff;Marina Milyavskaya

  • Distinguishing Autonomous and Directive Forms of Goal Support Their Effects on Goal Progress, Relationship Quality, and Subjective Well-Being

    Richard Koestner;Theodore A. Powers;Noémie Carbonneau;Marina Milyavskaya

  • Restoration process of the need for autonomy: the early alarm stage.

    Rémi Radel;Luc G. Pelletier;Philippe Sarrazin;Marina Milyavskaya

  • Where Do Self-Concordant Goals Come From? The Role of Domain-Specific Psychological Need Satisfaction

    Marina Milyavskaya;Daniel Nadolny;Richard Koestner

  • Inspired to get there: The effects of trait and goal inspiration on goal progress

    Marina Milyavskaya;Iana Ianakieva;Emily Foxen-Craft;Agnes Colantuoni

  • Motivation and self-regulation: The role of want-to motivation in the processes underlying self-regulation and self-control

    Kaitlyn M. Werner;Marina Milyavskaya

  • The many faces of self-control: Tacit assumptions and recommendations to deal with them.

    Marina Milyavskaya;Elliot T. Berkman;Denise T. D. De Ridder

  • Self-control in daily life: Prevalence and effectiveness of diverse self-control strategies.

    Marina Milyavskaya;Blair Saunders;Michael Inzlicht

  • Goal Pursuit: Current state of affairs and directions for future research

    Marina Milyavskaya;Kaitlyn M. Werner

  • Attentional and motivational mechanisms of self-control

    Marina Milyavskaya;Michael Inzlicht

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Koestner
Richard Koestner McGill University
Michael Inzlicht
Michael Inzlicht University of Toronto
Michael J. Larson
Michael J. Larson Brigham Young University
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum
Nancy L. Heath
Nancy L. Heath McGill University
Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Jeffrey L. Derevensky McGill University
Elliot T. Berkman
Elliot T. Berkman University of Oregon
Michael J. A. Wohl
Michael J. A. Wohl Carleton University
Geneviève A. Mageau
Geneviève A. Mageau University of Montreal
Keith S. Dobson
Keith S. Dobson University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many students consider online programs as a flexible option, especially for those balancing work and personal responsibilities. Popular fields include clinical counseling, school counseling, and mental health support.

If you’re interested in becoming a counselor rapidly, you may want to learn about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Wisconsin or discover the fastest way to become a counselor in Wyoming. Each state has its own education and certification requirements, so the process can vary depending on where you plan to practice.

School counseling is another growing field. If you’re considering working in educational settings, explore guides on how to become a school counselor in Alabama or how to become a school counselor in Alaska to understand state-specific requirements.

Whether you pursue a general psychology degree or specialize, online studies can help you join this dynamic profession and adapt to regional licensing or certification standards.

Best Scientists Citing Marina Milyavskaya

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles