World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 44 7444 7227 236 235 269 10630

Fabio Ramos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fabio Ramos between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fabio Ramos published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2009. 24 of the 350 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2009. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 2 publications
2002 2026

350 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fabio Ramos: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 7
2006 5
2007 10
2008 6
2009 39
2010 17
2011 15
2012 16
2013 9
2014 12
2015 7
2016 18
2017 15
2018 28
2019 27
2020 25
2021 20
2022 16
2023 12
2024 18
2025 22
2026 2
Total 350
Download as CSV

Fabio Ramos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Ramos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 262–271 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 269 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301 269
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Fabio Ramos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Ramos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 44
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fabio Ramos is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in robotics and artificial intelligence. Their work spans key areas such as robot manipulation, path planning, reinforcement learning, and sensor-based localization.

The main fields of study for Fabio Ramos include Computer Science and Engineering. Within these areas, they specialize in various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Aerospace Engineering, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

Fabio Ramos's research topics cover:

  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Advanced Control Systems Optimization

The scientist has published papers in multiple venues, with a notable presence in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
  • 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Recent publications showcasing Fabio Ramos's research contributions include:

  • "Robot Learning From Randomized Simulations: A Review," 2022, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • "Bayesian Local Sampling-Based Planning," 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Stein ICP for Uncertainty Estimation in Point Cloud Matching," 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Stein Particle Filter for Nonlinear, Non-Gaussian State Estimation," 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "STORM: An Integrated Framework for Fast Joint-Space Model-Predictive Control for Reactive Manipulation," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Fabio Ramos frequently collaborates with various researchers, including:

  • Dieter Fox
  • Tin Lai
  • Yashraj Narang
  • Lionel Ott
  • Eric Heiden

Best Publications

  • Simple online and realtime tracking

    Alex Bewley;Zongyuan Ge;Lionel Ott;Fabio Ramos

  • Malicious Software Classification Using Transfer Learning of ResNet-50 Deep Neural Network

    Edmar Rezende;Guilherme Ruppert;Tiago Carvalho;Fabio Ramos

  • Gaussian process occupancy maps

    Simon T O'Callaghan;Fabio T Ramos

  • Gaussian process modeling of large-scale terrain

    Shrihari Vasudevan;Fabio Ramos;Eric Nettleton;Hugh Durrant-Whyte

  • Bayesian optimisation for Intelligent Environmental Monitoring

    Roman Marchant;Fabio Ramos

  • Hilbert maps: scalable continuous occupancy mapping with stochastic gradient descent

    Fabio Tozeto Ramos;Lionel Ott

  • Gaussian process modeling of large-scale terrain: Vasudevan et al.: Gaussian Process Modeling of Large-Scale Terrain

    Shrihari Vasudevan;Fabio Ramos;Eric Nettleton;Hugh Durrant-Whyte

  • Bayesian Optimisation for informative continuous path planning.

    Román Marchant;Fabio Tozeto Ramos

  • Malicious Software Classification Using VGG16 Deep Neural Network’s Bottleneck Features

    Edmar Rezende;Guilherme Ruppert;Tiago Carvalho;Antonio Theophilo

  • Unsupervised clustering of people from 'skeleton' data

    Adrian Ball;David Rye;Fabio Ramos;Mari Velonaki

  • Airborne vision-based mapping and classification of large farmland environments

    Mitch Bryson;Alistair Reid;Fabio Ramos;Salah Sukkarieh

  • BayesSim: Adaptive Domain Randomization Via Probabilistic Inference for Robotics Simulators

    Fabio Ramos;Rafael Carvalhaes Possas;Dieter Fox

  • A sparse covariance function for exact Gaussian process inference in large datasets

    Arman Melkumyan;Fabio Ramos

  • Modeling and decision making in spatio-temporal processes for environmental surveillance

    Amarjeet Singh;Fabio Ramos;Hugh Durrant Whyte;William J Kaiser

  • CRF-Matching: Conditional Random Fields for Feature-Based Scan Matching

    Fabio T. Ramos;Dieter Fox;Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte

  • Classification and Semantic Mapping of Urban Environments

    B. Douillard;D. Fox;F. Ramos;H. Durrant-Whyte

  • Airborne vision-based mapping and classification of large farmland environments: Bryson et al.: Airborne Vision-Based Mapping and Classification of Farmlands

    Mitch Bryson;Alistair Reid;Fabio Ramos;Salah Sukkarieh

  • Contextual occupancy maps using Gaussian processes

    Simon O'Callaghan;Fabio. T. Ramos;Hugh Durrant-Whyte

  • Multi-kernel Gaussian processes

    Arman Melkumyan;Fabio Ramos

  • Hilbert maps

    Fabio Ramos;Lionel Ott

  • IRIS: Implicit Reinforcement without Interaction at Scale for Learning Control from Offline Robot Manipulation Data

    Ajay Mandlekar;Fabio Ramos;Byron Boots;Silvio Savarese

  • Gaussian Process modeling of large scale terrain

    Shrihari Vasudevan;Fabio Ramos;Eric Nettleton;Hugh Durrant-Whyte

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh Durrant-Whyte
Hugh Durrant-Whyte University of Sydney
Ben Upcroft
Ben Upcroft Queensland University of Technology
Dieter Fox
Dieter Fox University of Washington
Byron Boots
Byron Boots University of Washington
Salah Sukkarieh
Salah Sukkarieh University of Sydney
Bernard W. Balleine
Bernard W. Balleine University of New South Wales
Juan Nieto
Juan Nieto Microsoft (United States)
Peter Dayan
Peter Dayan Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Anthony Harris
Anthony Harris University of Sydney
Fabio Gagliardi Cozman
Fabio Gagliardi Cozman Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open diverse opportunities for students interested in Computer Science in the USA. Flexible learning options make it easier to balance your education with other commitments.

If you're looking to build foundational skills quickly, consider earning an associates degree online. This can be a fast and affordable way to enter the tech field or prepare for further study.

For professionals seeking to advance their careers, there are many high-quality advanced programs available. Explore the quickest online masters degree programs to earn your credentials in less time. Choosing the best masters degree to get can also boost your job prospects, especially in fast-growing tech sectors.

Affordability matters, too. Many of the most affordable online colleges offer respected Computer Science programs, helping you minimize debt while gaining valuable skills.

With the right degree and pathway, you’ll be better equipped to succeed in dynamic technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Fabio Ramos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles