World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3154 2898 1527 1381 127 9373

David M. DeJoy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. DeJoy between 1976 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. DeJoy published across 49 years, from 1976 to 2024, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2009. 3 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2009. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1976 2024

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. DeJoy: publications per year, 1976 to 2024
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 4
1985 3
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 5
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 5
2009 11
2010 9
2011 3
2012 3
2013 4
2014 3
2015 4
2016 7
2017 6
2018 7
2019 7
2020 4
2021 4
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
Total 133
Download as CSV

David M. DeJoy publications per year - data summary

  • David M. DeJoy, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Georgia, has 133 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1976 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1976 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1976, 1981, 1983, 1986 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1977, 1978, 1979, 1980 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.2 per year counting only the 42 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 12 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1976-1992: 24 publications (1.4 per year); 1993-2009: 44 publications (2.6 per year); 2010-2024: 65 publications (4.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

David M. DeJoy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. DeJoy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 127 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 127
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. DeJoy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • David M. DeJoy, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Georgia, records 127 publications - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than David M. DeJoy, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and David M. DeJoy ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

David M. DeJoy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. DeJoy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

David M. DeJoy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • David M. DeJoy, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Georgia, records 48 D-Index - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than David M. DeJoy, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and David M. DeJoy ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

David M. DeJoy is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on health professions, with significant contributions in occupational health and safety domains.

The main fields of study for David M. DeJoy include Health Professions, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Social Psychology.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics connected to workplace and health-related issues including:

  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Occupational Health and Performance
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Stress and Burnout Research
  • Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention

Recent papers authored or coauthored by David M. DeJoy include:

  • Safety specific transformational leadership, safety motivation and personal protective equipment use among firefighters, 2020, Safety Science
  • Stress, burnout and diminished safety behaviors: An argument for Total Worker Health® approaches in the fire service, 2020, Journal of Safety Research
  • Firefighter Overexertion: A Continuing Problem Found in an Analysis of Non-Fatal Injury Among Career Firefighters, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Occupational Stress and Burnout in the Fire Service: Examining the Complex Role and Impact of Sleep Health, 2021, Behavior Modification
  • Translating CDSMP to the Workplace: Results of the Live Healthy Work Healthy Program, 2020, American Journal of Health Promotion

Their frequent coauthors include Todd D. Smith, Mari-Amanda Dyal, Charmaine Mullins-Jaime, and Nicholas J. Haynes.

David M. DeJoy's work is often published in journals such as Journal of Safety Research, Safety Science, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Behavior Modification, and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Work characteristics and employee health and well-being: Test of a model of healthy work organization.

    Mark G. Wilson;David M. Dejoy;Robert J. Vandenberg;Hettie A. Richardson

  • Creating safer workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate.

    David M. DeJoy;Bryan S. Schaffer;Murray G. A. Wilson;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • AN EXAMINATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT RISK PERCEPTION

    David M. DeJoy

  • THE OPTIMISM BIAS AND TRAFFIC ACCIDENT RISK PERCEPTION

    David M. DeJoy

  • Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety

    David M. DeJoy

  • Warnings and Risk Communication

    Michael S. Wogalter;David M. DeJoy;Kenneth R. Laughery

  • Individual reactions to high involvement work processes: investigating the role of empowerment and perceived organizational support.

    Marcus M. Butts;Robert J. Vandenberg;David M. DeJoy;Bryan S. Schaffer

  • Effects of management communication, opportunity for learning, and work schedule flexibility on organizational commitment☆

    Thomas W.H. Ng;Marcus M. Butts;Robert J. Vandenberg;David M. DeJoy

  • Assessment of relationships between work stress, work-family conflict, burnout and firefighter safety behavior outcomes

    Todd D. Smith;Kevin Hughes;David M. DeJoy;Mari-Amanda Dyal

  • Theoretical models of health behavior and workplace self-protective behavior

    David M. DeJoy

  • Managing safety in the workplace: An attribution theory analysis and model

    David M. DeJoy

  • An Experimental Study of Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Dating Violence

    Teresa M. Bethke;David M. DeJOY

  • Move to Improve: a randomized workplace trial to increase physical activity.

    Rod K. Dishman;David M. DeJoy;Mark G. Wilson;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • A multi-worksite analysis of the relationships among body mass index, medical utilization, and worker productivity.

    Ron Z. Goetzel;Teresa B. Gibson;Meghan E. Short;Bong Chul Chu

  • Making work safer: testing a model of social exchange and safety management.

    David M. DeJoy;Lindsay J. Della;Robert J. Vandenberg;Mark G. Wilson

  • Safety-specific transformational and passive leadership influences on firefighter safety climate perceptions and safety behavior outcomes

    Todd D. Smith;Franklin Eldridge;David M. DeJoy

  • Assessing the impact of healthy work organization intervention

    David M. DeJoy;Mark G. Wilson;Robert J. Vandenberg;Allison L. McGrath-Higgins

  • Organizational health promotion: broadening the horizon of workplace health promotion.

    David M. DeJoy;Mark G. Wilson

  • Occupational injury in America: An analysis of risk factors using data from the General Social Survey (GSS).

    Todd D. Smith;David M. DeJoy

  • Behavioral-diagnostic analysis of compliance with universal precautions among nurses.

    David M. DeJoy;Cynthia A. Searcy;Lawrence R. Murphy;Robyn R. M. Gershon

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Vandenberg
Robert J. Vandenberg University of Georgia
Rod K. Dishman
Rod K. Dishman University of Georgia
Robyn R.M. Gershon
Robyn R.M. Gershon New York University
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Kate Lorig
Kate Lorig Stanford University
Michael S. Wogalter
Michael S. Wogalter North Carolina State University
Marcia G. Ory
Marcia G. Ory Texas A&M University
Jos A. Bosch
Jos A. Bosch University of Amsterdam
Daniel C. Feldman
Daniel C. Feldman University of Georgia
Thomas W. H. Ng
Thomas W. H. Ng University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career pathways, especially through accredited online study options. Online degrees allow students to conveniently balance learning with work or family responsibilities while gaining valuable credentials in high-demand fields.

For those interested in supporting the wellbeing of others, consider the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited), which meet rigorous professional standards and prepare graduates for state licensure. If your passion lies in helping families and couples strengthen their relationships, a masters in marriage and family therapy online could be the right fit.

Other popular options include pursuing an accredited online psychology degree, widely respected and applicable across counseling, research, and corporate sectors. Those drawn to social advocacy may find fulfillment with the msw degree, ideal for careers in social work and community leadership.

Each pathway provides a stepping stone to meaningful careers, with online programs offering flexibility and accessibility for learners worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing David M. DeJoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles