World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 36 9132 8755 345 335 123 5260

Scott D. Chambers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott D. Chambers between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott D. Chambers published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2016. 15 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2016. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
2000 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott D. Chambers: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 5
2007 1
2008 2
2009 3
2010 6
2011 3
2012 3
2013 7
2014 8
2015 14
2016 16
2017 14
2018 9
2019 12
2020 9
2021 7
2022 13
2023 13
2024 6
2025 9
Total 166
Download as CSV

Scott D. Chambers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Chambers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 123
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott D. Chambers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Chambers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206 36
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott D. Chambers is affiliated with the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, and health professions, with an emphasis on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and radiological and ultrasound technology.

The main topics of Scott D. Chambers' work include radioactivity and radon measurements, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, radioactive contamination and transfer, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric ozone and climate, and radiation detection and scintillator technologies.

Frequent coauthors in Chambers' research include:

  • Alastair G. Williams
  • Ruhi S. Humphries
  • Annette Röttger
  • Stefan Röttger
  • Luke T. Cravigan

Scott D. Chambers has published extensively in several scientific journals and venues. The most common publication venues are:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Atmosphere

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Scott D. Chambers include:

  • New metrology for radon at the environmental level, 2021, Measurement Science and Technology
  • Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Simulation of radon-222 with the GEOS-Chem global model: emissions, seasonality, and convective transport, 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Temperate mire fluctuations from carbon sink to carbon source following changes in water table, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222 Rn and 222 Rn progeny monitors, 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Best Publications

  • The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming.

    J. T. Randerson;H. Liu;M. G. Flanner;S. D. Chambers

  • Land-atmosphere energy exchange in Arctic tundra and boreal forest: available data and feedbacks to climate.

    Werner Eugster;Wayne R Rouse;Roger A. Pielke Sr;Joseph P. Mcfadden

  • The effect of post-fire stand age on the boreal forest energy balance

    B.D. Amiro;B.D. Amiro;A.L. Orchansky;A.G. Barr;T.A. Black

  • Observations of ice nucleating particles over Southern Ocean waters

    C. S. McCluskey;C. S. McCluskey;T. C. J. Hill;R. S. Humphries;A. M. Rauker

  • Ground based radon-222 observations and their application to atmospheric studies.

    W. Zahorowski;S.D. Chambers;A. Henderson-Sellers

  • Fire effects on surface‐atmosphere energy exchange in Alaskan black spruce ecosystems: Implications for feedbacks to regional climate

    S. D. Chambers;F. S. Chapin

  • Fire effects on net radiation and energy partitioning: Contrasting responses of tundra and boreal forest ecosystems

    SD Chambers;Jason Beringer;JT Randerson;FS Chapin

  • Separating remote fetch and local mixing influences on vertical radon measurements in the lower atmosphere

    S. Chambers;A. G. Williams;W. Zahorowski;A. Griffiths

  • On the use of radon for quantifying the effects of atmospheric stability on urban emissions

    S. D. Chambers;A. G. Williams;J. Crawford;A. D. Griffiths

  • The Vertical Distribution of Radon in Clear and Cloudy Daytime Terrestrial Boundary Layers

    Alastair G. Williams;Wlodek Zahorowski;Scott Chambers;Alan Griffiths

  • Radon-222 in boundary layer and free tropospheric continental outflow events at three ACE-Asia sites

    Wlodek Zahorowski;Scott Chambers;Tao Wang;Chang Hee Kang

  • Bulk Mixing and Decoupling of the Nocturnal Stable Boundary Layer Characterized Using a Ubiquitous Natural Tracer

    AG Williams;SD Chambers;AD Griffiths

  • Simulation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols with the climate model EC-Earth

    T. P. C. van Noije;P. Le Sager;A. J. Segers;P. F. J. van Velthoven

  • Towards a Universal “Baseline” Characterisation of Air Masses for High- and Low-Altitude Observing Stations Using Radon-222

    Scott D. Chambers;Alastair G. Williams;Franz Conen;Alan D. Griffiths

  • Quantifying the influences of atmospheric stability on air pollution in Lanzhou, China, using a radon-based stability monitor

    Scott D. Chambers;Fenjuan Wang;Fenjuan Wang;Alastair G. Williams;Deng Xiaodong

  • Characterising terrestrial influences on Antarctic air masses using Radon-222 measurements at King George Island

    S. D Chambers;Sang-Bum Hong;A. G. Williams;J. Crawford

  • Characterizing Atmospheric Transport Pathways to Antarctica and the Remote Southern Ocean using Radon-222

    Scott Chambers;Susanne Preunkert;Rolf Weller;Sang-Bum Hong

  • Radon as a tracer of atmospheric influences on traffic-related air pollution in a small inland city

    Alastair G. Williams;Scott D. Chambers;Franz Conen;Stefan Reimann

  • Atmospheric transport and chemistry of trace gases in LMDz5B: evaluation and implications for inverse modelling

    R. Locatelli;P. Bousquet;F. Hourdin;M. Saunois

  • Surface-to-mountaintop transport characterised by radon observations at the Jungfraujoch

    A. D. Griffiths;F. Conen;E. Weingartner;L. Zimmermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Melita Keywood
Melita Keywood Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ian E. Galbally
Ian E. Galbally Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paul B. Krummel
Paul B. Krummel Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ki-Hyun Kim
Ki-Hyun Kim Hanyang University
Zoran Ristovski
Zoran Ristovski Queensland University of Technology
Matthew F. McCabe
Matthew F. McCabe King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Rachel M. Law
Rachel M. Law Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
David W. T. Griffith
David W. T. Griffith University of Wollongong
Ingeborg Levin
Ingeborg Levin Heidelberg University
Franz Conen
Franz Conen University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many choose to specialize with a best online geology degree to understand Earth's processes and address environmental challenges more effectively.

Another growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), where professionals use spatial data to manage natural resources and plan sustainable development. Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs offers advanced skills essential for environmental monitoring and decision-making.

Environmental policy and management also play vital roles. A one year MPA program provides practical leadership training for those aiming to influence public administration and environmental regulations.

Lastly, understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial. An online bachelors in sociology equips students with insights into human behavior and social systems, enhancing interdisciplinary approaches to environmental solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Chambers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles