World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
5260
World Ranking
9130
National Ranking
345

Scott D. Chambers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Chambers sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Scott D. Chambers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Chambers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott D. Chambers is affiliated with the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, and health professions, with an emphasis on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and radiological and ultrasound technology.

The main topics of Scott D. Chambers' work include radioactivity and radon measurements, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, radioactive contamination and transfer, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric ozone and climate, and radiation detection and scintillator technologies.

Frequent coauthors in Chambers' research include:

  • Alastair G. Williams
  • Ruhi S. Humphries
  • Annette Röttger
  • Stefan Röttger
  • Luke T. Cravigan

Scott D. Chambers has published extensively in several scientific journals and venues. The most common publication venues are:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Atmosphere

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Scott D. Chambers include:

  • New metrology for radon at the environmental level, 2021, Measurement Science and Technology
  • Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Simulation of radon-222 with the GEOS-Chem global model: emissions, seasonality, and convective transport, 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Temperate mire fluctuations from carbon sink to carbon source following changes in water table, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222 Rn and 222 Rn progeny monitors, 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Best Publications

  • The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming.

    J. T. Randerson;H. Liu;M. G. Flanner;S. D. Chambers

  • Land-atmosphere energy exchange in Arctic tundra and boreal forest: available data and feedbacks to climate.

    Werner Eugster;Wayne R Rouse;Roger A. Pielke Sr;Joseph P. Mcfadden

  • The effect of post-fire stand age on the boreal forest energy balance

    B.D. Amiro;B.D. Amiro;A.L. Orchansky;A.G. Barr;T.A. Black

  • Observations of ice nucleating particles over Southern Ocean waters

    C. S. McCluskey;C. S. McCluskey;T. C. J. Hill;R. S. Humphries;A. M. Rauker

  • Ground based radon-222 observations and their application to atmospheric studies.

    W. Zahorowski;S.D. Chambers;A. Henderson-Sellers

  • Fire effects on surface‐atmosphere energy exchange in Alaskan black spruce ecosystems: Implications for feedbacks to regional climate

    S. D. Chambers;F. S. Chapin

  • Fire effects on net radiation and energy partitioning: Contrasting responses of tundra and boreal forest ecosystems

    SD Chambers;Jason Beringer;JT Randerson;FS Chapin

  • Separating remote fetch and local mixing influences on vertical radon measurements in the lower atmosphere

    S. Chambers;A. G. Williams;W. Zahorowski;A. Griffiths

  • On the use of radon for quantifying the effects of atmospheric stability on urban emissions

    S. D. Chambers;A. G. Williams;J. Crawford;A. D. Griffiths

  • The Vertical Distribution of Radon in Clear and Cloudy Daytime Terrestrial Boundary Layers

    Alastair G. Williams;Wlodek Zahorowski;Scott Chambers;Alan Griffiths

  • Radon-222 in boundary layer and free tropospheric continental outflow events at three ACE-Asia sites

    Wlodek Zahorowski;Scott Chambers;Tao Wang;Chang Hee Kang

  • Bulk Mixing and Decoupling of the Nocturnal Stable Boundary Layer Characterized Using a Ubiquitous Natural Tracer

    AG Williams;SD Chambers;AD Griffiths

  • Simulation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols with the climate model EC-Earth

    T. P. C. van Noije;P. Le Sager;A. J. Segers;P. F. J. van Velthoven

  • Towards a Universal “Baseline” Characterisation of Air Masses for High- and Low-Altitude Observing Stations Using Radon-222

    Scott D. Chambers;Alastair G. Williams;Franz Conen;Alan D. Griffiths

  • Quantifying the influences of atmospheric stability on air pollution in Lanzhou, China, using a radon-based stability monitor

    Scott D. Chambers;Fenjuan Wang;Fenjuan Wang;Alastair G. Williams;Deng Xiaodong

  • Characterising terrestrial influences on Antarctic air masses using Radon-222 measurements at King George Island

    S. D Chambers;Sang-Bum Hong;A. G. Williams;J. Crawford

  • Characterizing Atmospheric Transport Pathways to Antarctica and the Remote Southern Ocean using Radon-222

    Scott Chambers;Susanne Preunkert;Rolf Weller;Sang-Bum Hong

  • Radon as a tracer of atmospheric influences on traffic-related air pollution in a small inland city

    Alastair G. Williams;Scott D. Chambers;Franz Conen;Stefan Reimann

  • Atmospheric transport and chemistry of trace gases in LMDz5B: evaluation and implications for inverse modelling

    R. Locatelli;P. Bousquet;F. Hourdin;M. Saunois

  • Surface-to-mountaintop transport characterised by radon observations at the Jungfraujoch

    A. D. Griffiths;F. Conen;E. Weingartner;L. Zimmermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Melita Keywood
Melita Keywood Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ian E. Galbally
Ian E. Galbally Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paul B. Krummel
Paul B. Krummel Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ki-Hyun Kim
Ki-Hyun Kim Hanyang University
Zoran Ristovski
Zoran Ristovski Queensland University of Technology
Matthew F. McCabe
Matthew F. McCabe King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Rachel M. Law
Rachel M. Law Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
David W. T. Griffith
David W. T. Griffith University of Wollongong
Ingeborg Levin
Ingeborg Levin Heidelberg University
Franz Conen
Franz Conen University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many choose to specialize with a best online geology degree to understand Earth's processes and address environmental challenges more effectively.

Another growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), where professionals use spatial data to manage natural resources and plan sustainable development. Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs offers advanced skills essential for environmental monitoring and decision-making.

Environmental policy and management also play vital roles. A one year MPA program provides practical leadership training for those aiming to influence public administration and environmental regulations.

Lastly, understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial. An online bachelors in sociology equips students with insights into human behavior and social systems, enhancing interdisciplinary approaches to environmental solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Chambers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles