World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7671
World Ranking
6729
National Ranking
159

Franz Conen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Conen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Franz Conen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Conen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Franz Conen is a researcher affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland. Their work primarily centers on atmospheric science, with notable contributions to understanding atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, and atmospheric ozone and climate. Their research spans fields such as Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scientist has authored multiple papers, including:

  • Composition and sources of carbonaceous aerosol in the European Arctic at Zeppelin Observatory, Svalbard (2017 to 2020), 2024, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Measurement report: Ice-nucleating particles active ≥ −15 °C in free tropospheric air over western Europe, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Towards parameterising atmospheric concentrations of ice-nucleating particles active at moderate supercooling, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The contribution of Saharan dust to the ice-nucleating particle concentrations at the High Altitude Station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), Switzerland, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Regionally sourced bioaerosols drive high-temperature ice nucleating particles in the Arctic, 2023, Nature Communications

Franz Conen's frequent co-authors include Annika Einbock, Karl Espen Yttri, Zamin A. Kanji, Claudia Mignani, and Mikhail V. Yakutin. These collaborations highlight a network of researchers working on atmospheric and environmental sciences topics.

Their publications are frequently found in the journal Atmospheric chemistry and physics, alongside contributions to Nature Communications, Journal of Plant Interactions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Biogeosciences.

Key research topics associated with their work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Climate change and permafrost

Subfields of study where Franz Conen contributes include Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Their research encompasses diverse aspects of how atmospheric particles and gases interact with environment and climate systems, as well as biological responses.

Best Publications

  • Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes

    K. A. Smith;T. Ball;F. Conen;K. E. Dobbie

  • Effects of temperature, water content and nitrogen fertilisation on emissions of nitrous oxide by soils

    K.A Smith;P.E Thomson;H Clayton;I.P Mctaggart

  • Impacts of land management on fluxes of trace greenhouse gases

    K. A. Smith;F. Conen

  • Bioprecipitation: a feedback cycle linking Earth history, ecosystem dynamics and land use through biological ice nucleators in the atmosphere

    Cindy E. Morris;Cindy E. Morris;Franz Conen;J. Alex Huffman;Vaughan Phillips

  • Biological residues define the ice nucleation properties of soil dust

    F. Conen;C. E. Morris;J. Leifeld;M. V. Yakutin

  • Predicting N2O emissions from agricultural land through related soil parameters

    F. Conen;K. E. Dobbie;K. A. Smith

  • Mycorrhizal effects on nutrient cycling, nutrient leaching and N2O production in experimental grassland

    S. Franz Bender;Franz Conen;Marcel G.A. Van der Heijden;Marcel G.A. Van der Heijden

  • Emmissions of N2O from Scottish agricultural soils, as a function of fertiliser N

    Keith A. Smith;Iain P. McTaggart;Karen E. Dobbie;Franz Conen

  • A re‐examination of closed flux chamber methods for the measurement of trace gas emissions from soils to the atmosphere

    F. Conen;K. A. Smith

  • Storage and turnover of carbon in grassland soils along an elevation gradient in the Swiss Alps

    Jens Leifeld;Michael Zimmermann;Jürg Fuhrer;Franz Conen

  • Warming mineralises young and old soil carbon equally

    F. Conen;J. Leifeld;B. Seth;C. Alewell

  • An explanation of linear increases in gas concentration under closed chambers used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere.

    F. Conen;K. A. Smith

  • Analysis of long‐term aerosol size distribution data from Jungfraujoch with emphasis on free tropospheric conditions, cloud influence, and air mass transport

    Erik Herrmann;Ernest Weingartner;Stephan Henne;Laurent Vuilleumier

  • Latitudinal distribution of radon-222 flux from continents

    F. Conen;L. B. Robertson

  • Can composition and physical protection of soil organic matter explain soil respiration temperature sensitivity

    Michael Zimmermann;Michael Zimmermann;Jens Leifeld;Franz Conen;Michael I. Bird

  • Atmospheric ice nuclei at the high-altitude observatory Jungfraujoch, Switzerland

    Franz Conen;Sergio Rodríguez;Christoph Hüglin;Stephan Henne

  • Predicting terrestrial 222 Rn flux using gamma dose rate as a proxy

    T. Szegvary;M. C. Leuenberger;F. Conen

  • N2O exchange over managed grassland: application of a quantum cascade laser spectrometer for micrometeorological flux measurements.

    Albrecht Neftel;Christof Ammann;Cornelia Fischer;Christoph Spirig

  • European 222Rn inventory for applied atmospheric studies

    Thomas Szegvary;Franz Conen;Philippe Ciais

  • Potential for detecting changes in soil organic carbon concentrations resulting from climate change

    Franz Conen;Mikhail V. Yakutin;Anna D. Sambuu

  • A comprehensive characterization of ice nucleation by three different types of cellulose particles immersed in water

    Naruki Hiranuma;Kouji Adachi;David M. Bell;David M. Bell;Franco Belosi

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine Alewell
Christine Alewell University of Basel
Jens Leifeld
Jens Leifeld University of Basel
Keith Smith
Keith Smith University of Edinburgh
Nicolas Bukowiecki
Nicolas Bukowiecki University of Basel
Martin Steinbacher
Martin Steinbacher Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Stephan Henne
Stephan Henne Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Ernest Weingartner
Ernest Weingartner University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland
Scott D. Chambers
Scott D. Chambers Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Marcel G. A. van der Heijden
Marcel G. A. van der Heijden University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, a variety of related online degrees offer flexible learning options. Many professionals consider advanced programs like the best eds to edd programs to advance into leadership or educational roles that influence sustainability policies and community awareness.

Social work also intersects with environmental issues, especially in community health. The cheapest dsw program offers an affordable path for those looking to specialize in this impactful area online without compromising quality.

For students seeking broad preparation or career shifts, an accredited affordable online general studies degree provides a versatile foundation that can complement environmental knowledge with skills in communication, policy, or business.

Those new to higher education or seeking a manageable start might explore the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get topic, which highlights programs that balance workload and accessibility, potentially encouraging timely program completion.

Overall, combining environmental sciences with these diverse online degree options can open multiple career pathways, promoting both professional growth and societal impact.

Best Scientists Citing Franz Conen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles