World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
37831
World Ranking
9581
National Ranking
935

David Chadwick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chadwick sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Chadwick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chadwick sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - AMA Scientific Achievement Award, American Medical Association

Overview

David Chadwick is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on computer science and social sciences. Within computer science, Chadwick's work emphasizes subfields such as computer networks and communications, information systems, and artificial intelligence. Contributions also extend to sociology and political science as part of the social sciences domain.

The scientist's research topics cover a variety of areas in security and computing, including access control and trust, network security and intrusion detection, security and verification in computing, advanced malware detection techniques, internet traffic analysis and secure electronic voting, cloud data security solutions, and distributed and parallel computing systems.

David Chadwick has authored papers published across several reputable venues. Recent publications include:

  • "On the Validation of Web X.509 Certificates by TLS Interception Products" (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • "RootAsRole: a security module to manage the administrative privileges for Linux" (2022) in Computers & Security
  • "Enhancing the Acme Protocol to Automate the Management of All X.509 Web Certificates (Extended Version)" (2024) in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Enhancing the ACME protocol to automate the management of all X.509 web certificates (Extended version)" (2025) in Computer Communications
  • "Peer Review of 'COVID-19 and Cybersecurity: Finally, an Opportunity to Disrupt?'" (2021) in JMIRx Med

Frequent co-authors working with Chadwick include Romain Laborde, Ahmad Samer Wazan, Rémi Venant, and David Cordova Morales. The scientist has contributed to publications within various venues such as IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, Computers & Security, SSRN Electronic Journal, Computer Communications, and JMIRx Med, with several papers published in each.

Among accolades, Chadwick received the AMA Scientific Achievement Award from the American Medical Association in 2010. This recognition adds to the record of their academic and research contributions.

Best Publications

  • Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19

    P Horby;W S Lim;Emberson

  • ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes.

    Tracy Glauser;Elinor Ben-Menachem;Blaise Bourgeois;Avital Cnaan

  • The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial.

    Anthony G Marson;Asya M Al-Kharusi;Muna Alwaidh;Richard Appleton

  • The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial

    Anthony G Marson;Asya M Al-Kharusi;Muna Alwaidh;Richard Appleton

  • Arteriovenous malformations of the brain: natural history in unoperated patients.

    P M Crawford;C R West;D W Chadwick;M D Shaw

  • The clinical course of epilepsy and its psychosocial correlates: findings from a U.K. Community study.

    Ann Jacoby;Gus A. Baker;Nick Steen;Pauline Potts

  • The longer term outcome of children born to mothers with epilepsy

    N Adab;U Kini;J Vinten;J Ayres

  • Lopinavir–ritonavir in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

    Peter W Horby;Marion Mafham;Jennifer L Bell;Louise Linsell

  • The misdiagnosis of epilepsy and the management of refractory epilepsy in a specialist clinic.

    D. Smith;B.A. Defalla;D.W. Chadwick

  • Immediate versus deferred antiepileptic drug treatment for early epilepsy and single seizures: a randomised controlled trial

    A Marson;A Jacoby;A Johnson;L Kim

  • Randomised study of antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients in remission

    P. Bessant;D. Chadwick;B. Eaton

  • Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

    P Asselman;D W Chadwick;D C Marsden

  • The new antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.

    A. G. Marson;Z. A. Kadir;J. L. Hutton;D. W. Chadwick

  • Outcomes of add-on treatment with lamotrigine in partial epilepsy.

    D. Smith;G. Baker;G. Davies;M. Dewey

  • Prediction of risk of seizure recurrence after a single seizure and early epilepsy: further results from the MESS trial.

    Lois G Kim;Tony L Johnson;Anthony G Marson;David W Chadwick

  • Patients' Experiences of Injury as a Result of Epilepsy

    Deborah Buck;Gus A. Baker;Ann Jacoby;David F. Smith

  • HLA-B locus in Caucasian patients with carbamazepine hypersensitivity.

    Ana Alfirevic;Andrea L Jorgensen;Paula R Williamson;David W Chadwick

  • Additional educational needs in children born to mothers with epilepsy

    N Adab;A Jacoby;D Smith;D Chadwick

  • Cortical reflex myoclonus

    Mark Hallett;David Chadwick;C. D. Marsden

  • New antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.

    A G Marson;Z A Kadir;D W Chadwick

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony G Marson
Anthony G Marson University of Liverpool
Gus A. Baker
Gus A. Baker University of Liverpool
Paula R Williamson
Paula R Williamson University of Liverpool
Peter Jenner
Peter Jenner King's College London
Munir Pirmohamed
Munir Pirmohamed University of Liverpool
Charles David Marsden
Charles David Marsden King's College London
Michael Dewey
Michael Dewey King's College London
Simon Shorvon
Simon Shorvon University College London
Richard Appleton
Richard Appleton Alder Hey Children's Hospital
Richard Gray
Richard Gray University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always require attending medical school. Today, many students start their medical journey through alternative pathways with flexible, online study options. Popular fields include medical billing, coding, and nursing, all of which offer rewarding opportunities and are in high demand.

Those seeking entry-level healthcare roles might consider the cheapest medical coding certification online for a cost-effective first step. For those interested in patient care, a range of cheapest online nursing programs help new students earn credentials as registered nurses without leaving home.

Ambitious nurses can take their education further with the cheapest online np programs, preparing for advanced practice roles that provide greater clinical responsibility and a higher salary potential. For those aiming for leadership or academic positions, exploring phd nursing programs might be the ideal next step.

With these flexible online options, students can find affordable, accredited programs that match their career goals while balancing other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing David Chadwick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles