World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Israel
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
22949
World Ranking
2358
National Ranking
9

Batia Laufer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Batia Laufer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Batia Laufer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Batia Laufer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Israel Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Israel Leader Award

Overview

Batia Laufer is affiliated with the University of Haifa in Israel and has a research focus primarily on second language acquisition and learning, as well as natural language processing techniques. Their work spans multiple fields, including computer science, psychology, and the arts and humanities. Within these domains, their research notably addresses developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, language and linguistics, literature and literary theory, and computational theory and mathematics.

The main topics covered by Laufer's research include second language acquisition and learning, natural language processing techniques, text readability and simplification, reading and literacy development, lexicography and language studies, as well as EFL/ESL teaching and learning, and second language learning and teaching.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Laufer include:

  • Tom Cobb
  • Stuart Webb
  • Su Kyung Kim
  • Beverley Yohanan
  • Per Snoder

The scholar's research has been published in various venues, with multiple publications in TESOL Quarterly and Studies in Second Language Acquisition, as well as contributions to The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Other publication venues include Language Learning and ITL Review of Applied Linguistics.

Recent papers authored by Batia Laufer include:

  • "Lexical Coverages, Inferencing Unknown Words and Reading Comprehension: How Are They Related?" (2020), published in TESOL Quarterly
  • "How well do learners know derived words in a second language?" (2021), published in ITL Review of Applied Linguistics
  • "Understanding L2-derived words in context: Is complete receptive morphological knowledge necessary?" (2023), published in Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Other relevant works connected to Laufer's research network include "The Nuclear Word Family List: A List of the Most Frequent Family Members, Including Base and Affixed Words" (2021), published in Language Learning, and "EFL Learners' Receptive Knowledge of Derived Words: The Case of Swedish Adolescents" (2022), published in TESOL Quarterly.

Best Publications

  • INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE: THE CONSTRUCT OF TASK-INDUCED INVOLVEMENT

    Batia Laufer;Jan Hulstijn

  • Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production

    Batia Laufer;Paul Nation

  • The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language : Same or different ?

    Batia Laufer

  • SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE INVOLVEMENT LOAD HYPOTHESIS IN VOCABULARY ACQUISITION

    Jan H. Hulstijn;Batia Laufer

  • A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability

    Batia Laufer;Paul Nation

  • Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength, and Computer Adaptiveness.

    Batia Laufer;Zahava Goldstein

  • Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners' vocabulary size and reading comprehension

    Batia Laufer;Geke C. Ravenhorst-Kalovski

  • The Relationship Between Passive and Active Vocabularies: Effects of LanguageLearning Context

    Batia Laufer;T. Sima Paribakht

  • Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: Do Learners Really Acquire Most Vocabulary by Reading? Some Empirical Evidence

    Batia Laufer

  • Verb-Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English

    Batia Laufer;Tina Waldman

  • Form-focused Instruction in Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Case for Contrastive Analysis and Translation

    Batia Laufer;Nany Girsai

  • Lexical Guessing in Context in EFL Reading Comprehension.

    Marsha Bensoussan;Batia Laufer

  • How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension

    Batia Laufer

  • Focus on Form in Second Language Vocabulary Learning

    Batia Laufer

  • Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess

    Unknown

  • Size and strength: do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?

    Batia Laufer;Cathie Elder;Kathryn Hill;Peter Congdon

  • What Lexical Information Do L2 Learners Select in a CALL Dictionary and How Does It Affect Word Retention

    Batia Laufer

  • Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching Have Anything To Do With It?

    Batia Laufer;Karen Shmueli

  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Monolingual, Bilingual, and “Bilingualised” Dictionaries in the Comprehension and Production of New Words

    Batia Laufer;Linor Hadar

  • Vocabulary in a Second Language Selection, acquisition, and testing

    Paul Bogaards;Batia Laufer

  • Avoidance of Phrasal Verbs—A Case for Contrastive Analysis

    Menachem Dagut;Batia Laufer

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Nation
Paul Nation Victoria University of Wellington
Jan H. Hulstijn
Jan H. Hulstijn University of Amsterdam
Stuart Webb
Stuart Webb University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a variety of in-demand careers. Many learners are now choosing online degree pathways for greater flexibility, faster completion, and affordability.

For example, if your interests lie in social work, you might consider one of the fastest msw program options online to quickly start making an impact in communities. Similarly, psychology students can benefit from the fastest online psychology degree programs that accelerate the path to licensure and practice.

For those interested in counseling, finding reputable online education is crucial. Accredited options like cacrep-accredited online counseling programs ensure your credentials meet industry standards. If you want to specialize, masters in marriage and family therapy online programs offer focused training for supporting diverse families.

With so many flexible and affordable online options, it’s easier than ever to further your education and move confidently into rewarding social science and humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing Batia Laufer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles