World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
88
Citations
25087
World Ranking
1181
National Ranking
566

Pawel Stankiewicz publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pawel Stankiewicz sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 315 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Pawel Stankiewicz D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pawel Stankiewicz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pawel Stankiewicz is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States and has a significant body of research primarily within the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans a broad range of subfields including molecular biology, genetics, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and cancer research.

The scientist's research focuses notably on topics such as genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, congenital heart defects, congenital diaphragmatic hernia studies, genomics and rare diseases, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, RNA modifications and cancer, as well as renal and related cancers.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pawel Stankiewicz include Tomasz Gambin, Justyna A. Karolak, Przemysław Szafrański, James R. Lupski, and Weimin Bi.

Their publications have appeared repeatedly in several academic outlets. Prominent venues featuring their work include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Respiratory Research

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Pawel Stankiewicz include:

  • Low-level parental somatic mosaic SNVs in exomes from a large cohort of trios with diverse suspected Mendelian conditions, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Molecular Function and Contribution of TBX4 in Development and Disease, 2022, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Perturbation of semaphorin and VEGF signaling in ACDMPV lungs due to FOXF1 deficiency, 2021, Respiratory Research
  • Detection of low-level parental somatic mosaicism for clinically relevant SNVs and indels identified in a large exome sequencing dataset, 2021, Human Genomics
  • Haploinsufficiency of the Sin3/HDAC corepressor complex member SIN3B causes a syndromic intellectual disability/autism spectrum disorder, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics

Best Publications

  • Structural Variation in the Human Genome and its Role in Disease

    Paweł Stankiewicz;James R. Lupski

  • Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders

    Pawel Stankiewicz;James R. Lupski

  • Whole-Genome Sequencing in a Patient with Charcot–Marie–Tooth Neuropathy

    James R. Lupski;Jeffrey G. Reid;Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui;David Rio Deiros

  • Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes.

    James R Lupski;Pawel Stankiewicz

  • Recurrent reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications associated with microcephaly or macrocephaly and developmental and behavioral abnormalities

    Nicola Brunetti-Pierri;Jonathan S. Berg;Fernando Scaglia;John Belmont

  • Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size

    Marwan Shinawi;Pengfei Liu;Sung Hae L Kang;Joseph Shen

  • Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements

    Pengfei Liu;Ayelet Erez;Sandesh C.Sreenath Nagamani;Shweta U. Dhar

  • Characterization of Potocki-Lupski syndrome (dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)) and delineation of a dosage-sensitive critical interval that can convey an autism phenotype.

    Lorraine Potocki;Weimin Bi;Diane Treadwell-Deering;Claudia M. B. Carvalho

  • Genomic and genic deletions of the FOX gene cluster on 16q24.1 and inactivating mutations of FOXF1 cause alveolar capillary dysplasia and other malformations.

    Paweł Stankiewicz;Partha Sen;Samarth S. Bhatt;Mekayla Storer

  • Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation.

    Pawel Stankiewicz;Arthur L Beaudet

  • Mutant chromatin remodeling protein SMARCAL1 causes Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia.

    Cornelius F. Boerkoel;Hiroshi Takashima;Joy John;Jiong Yan

  • Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.

    Ian M. Campbell;Chad A. Shaw;Chad A. Shaw;Pawel Stankiewicz;James R. Lupski

  • Alveolar capillary dysplasia.

    Naomi B. Bishop;Pawel Stankiewicz;Robin H. Steinhorn

  • Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy‐number changes by array CGH

    Philip M. Boone;Carlos A. Bacino;Chad A. Shaw;Patricia A. Eng

  • Parental Somatic Mosaicism Is Underrecognized and Influences Recurrence Risk of Genomic Disorders

    Ian M. Campbell;Bo Yuan;Caroline Robberecht;Rolph P. Pfundt

  • Periaxin Mutations Cause Recessive Dejerine-Sottas Neuropathy

    Cornelius F. Boerkoel;Hiroshi Takashima;Pawel Stankiewicz;Carlos A. Garcia

  • Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases

    Xinyan Lu;Chad A. Shaw;Ankita Patel;Jiangzhen Li

  • Microdeletion 15q13.3: a locus with incomplete penetrance for autism, mental retardation, and psychiatric disorders

    S. Ben-Shachar;B. Lanpher;J. R. German;M. Qasaymeh

  • Position effects due to chromosome breakpoints that map ∼900 Kb upstream and ∼1.3 Mb downstream of SOX9 in two patients with campomelic dysplasia

    Gopalrao V.N. Velagaleti;Gabriel A. Bien-Willner;Jill K. Northup;Lillian H. Lockhart

  • Microarray‐based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogenetics

    Sau W. Cheung;Chad A. Shaw;Daryl A. Scott;Ankita Patel

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Lupski
James R. Lupski Baylor College of Medicine
Sau Wai Cheung
Sau Wai Cheung Baylor College of Medicine
Ankita Patel
Ankita Patel Baylor College of Medicine
Chad A. Shaw
Chad A. Shaw Baylor College of Medicine
Tomasz Gambin
Tomasz Gambin Warsaw University of Technology
Seema R. Lalani
Seema R. Lalani Baylor College of Medicine
Carlos A. Bacino
Carlos A. Bacino Baylor College of Medicine
Jill A. Rosenfeld
Jill A. Rosenfeld Baylor College of Medicine
Arthur L. Beaudet
Arthur L. Beaudet Baylor College of Medicine
Ayelet Erez
Ayelet Erez Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Genetics opens doors to numerous online degrees and rewarding career paths in healthcare and research. Professionals seeking flexibility and affordability often consider affordable fnp programs as nurse practitioners are in high demand for their specialized expertise.

Those beginning their healthcare journey can explore affordable online nursing programs, which offer foundational knowledge and essential skills in patient care. These programs frequently integrate genetics as part of the curriculum, providing a valuable perspective for future roles.

For registered nurses aiming for career advancement, rn to bsn online cheap and fast programs deliver a streamlined path to higher qualifications—key for leadership positions.

Experienced nurses may also consider the best online bsn to dnp programs, designed to cultivate advanced clinical knowledge and open doors to executive or research roles.

By exploring these online options, students and professionals in genetics can align their education with evolving healthcare demands and pursue a meaningful, flexible career.

Best Scientists Citing Pawel Stankiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles