World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
19838
World Ranking
1890
National Ranking
15

Peter J. McKenna publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. McKenna sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 329 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Peter J. McKenna D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. McKenna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. McKenna is affiliated with Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers in Spain and has a research focus primarily centered on schizophrenia and related neurological disorders. Their work integrates approaches from medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology. Their publications demonstrate a detailed investigation into the neural mechanisms underlying schizophrenia, especially treatment-resistant forms of the disorder.

McKenna's recent papers include studies examining the application and effects of deep brain stimulation in schizophrenia patients. Notable publications are:

  • Deep brain stimulation in treatment resistant schizophrenia: A pilot randomized cross-over clinical trial, 2020, EBioMedicine
  • Target selection for deep brain stimulation in treatment resistant schizophrenia, 2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Brain correlates of speech perception in schizophrenia patients with and without auditory hallucinations, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Brain metabolic changes in patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia treated with deep brain stimulation: A series of cases, 2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Negative schizophrenic symptoms as prefrontal cortex dysfunction: Examination using a task measuring goal neglect, 2022, NeuroImage Clinical

The frequent co-authors with whom McKenna collaborates reflect a concentrated network of researchers in related fields. These include Edith Pomarol-Clotet, Paola Fuentes-Claramonte, Salvador Sarró, Raymond Salvador, and Pilar Salgado-Pineda.

McKenna has published extensively in several venues that highlight their research focus, including Neuroscience Applied, Psychological Medicine, European Psychiatry, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, and NeuroImage Clinical.

Their principal fields of study comprise medicine and neuroscience, with specialized work in subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, neurology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. This broad disciplinary foundation supports their examination of functional brain connectivity, neural and behavioral psychology, and neurological treatments.

Main topics addressed in their work encompass schizophrenia research and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neurological disorders and treatments, psychedelics and drug studies, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, and neuroscience and music perception.

Best Publications

  • Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia

    Mary-Ellen Lynall;Danielle S. Bassett;Danielle S. Bassett;Robert Kerwin;Peter J. McKenna

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy for the symptoms of schizophrenia : systematic review and meta-analysis with examination of potential bias

    S. Jauhar;P. J. McKenna;J. Radua;E. Fung

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for major psychiatric disorder: does it really work? A meta-analytical review of well-controlled trials.

    D. Lynch;K. R. Laws;P. J. McKenna

  • Hypofrontality in schizophrenia: a meta‐analysis of functional imaging studies

    K. Hill;L. Mann;K. R. Laws;C. M. E. Stephenson

  • Memory impairment in schizophrenia: its extent, affiliations and neuropsychological character.

    D. Tamlyn;P. J. McKenna;A. M. Mortimer;C. E. Lund

  • Failure to deactivate in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: dysfunction of the default mode network?

    E. Pomarol-Clotet;R. Salvador;S. Sarró;J. Gomar

  • Abnormal cingulate modulation of fronto-temporal connectivity in schizophrenia.

    P. Fletcher;P. J. McKenna;K. J. Friston;C. D. Frith

  • Memory in schizophrenia : what is impaired and what is preserved ?

    L. Clare;Peter J. McKenna;A. M. Mortimer;Alan D. Baddeley

  • Amnesic syndrome in schizophrenia.

    P. J. McKenna;D. Tamlyn;C. E. Lund;A. M. Mortimer

  • Disease-relevant autoantibodies in first episode schizophrenia

    Michael S. Zandi;Sarosh R. Irani;Bethan Lang;Patrick Waters

  • Clozapine alone versus clozapine and risperidone with refractory schizophrenia.

    William G. Honer;Allen E. Thornton;Eric Y.H. Chen;Raymond C.K. Chan

  • Modafinil Improves Cognition and Attentional Set Shifting in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia

    Danielle C Turner;Luke Clark;Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Peter McKenna

  • Assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome in schizophrenia

    J. J. Evans;S. E. Chua;P. J. McKENNA;B. A. Wilson

  • Systemic sulpiride in young adult volunteers simulates the profile of cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease.

    Mitul A. Mehta;B. J. Sahakian;Peter J. McKenna;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Gene expression analysis in schizophrenia: Reproducible up-regulation of several members of the apolipoprotein L family located in a high-susceptibility locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 22

    Michael L. Mimmack;Margaret Ryan;Hajime Baba;Juani Navarro-Ruiz

  • Psychological effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers. Phenomenological study.

    E. Pomarol-Clotet;G. D. Honey;G. K. Murray;P. R. Corlett

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.

    Joaquim Radua;Eduard Vieta;Russell Shinohara;Peter Kochunov

  • Brain Activations in Schizophrenia During a Graded Memory Task Studied With Functional Neuroimaging

    Paul C. Fletcher;Peter J. McKenna;Christopher D. Frith;Paul M. Grasby

  • A validation study of three anxiety and depression self-assessment scales

    Unknown

  • The Cambridge Neurological Inventory: a clinical instrument for assessment of soft neurological signs in psychiatric patients.

    Eric Y.H Chen;Eric Y.H Chen;Jane Shapleske;Rogelio Luque;Peter J McKenna

  • Functional dysconnectivity in schizophrenia associated with attentional modulation of motor function

    Garry D. Honey;Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Philip R. Corlett;Rebekah A. E. Honey

  • Frontal responses during learning predict vulnerability to the psychotogenic effects of ketamine: Linking cognition, brain activity, and psychosis

    Philip R. Corlett;Garry D. Honey;Michael R. F. Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith R. Laws
Keith R. Laws University of Hertfordshire
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Jose Manuel Goikolea
Jose Manuel Goikolea University of Barcelona
German E. Berrios
German E. Berrios University of Cambridge
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
Rosaleen A. McCarthy
Rosaleen A. McCarthy University of Cambridge
Anthony S. David
Anthony S. David University College London
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Lourdes Fañanás
Lourdes Fañanás University of Barcelona
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career paths. One promising avenue is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a profession that is in high demand across the country. A BCBA helps individuals develop important behavioral skills and works in settings including schools, clinics, and private practices.

To pursue this career, students often look into how to become a bcba in Arlington or explore becoming a bcba in Atlanta for specific state requirements and application processes. Since every state may have unique criteria, it's important to research your desired location.

For instance, Aurora bcba requirements and becoming a bcba in Austin each have their own steps toward certification, including accredited online degree programs, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam.

Online psychology degrees with a focus on behavior analysis provide flexibility for students seeking these roles. Exploring regional requirements and available online pathways is crucial for anyone interested in this fulfilling and impactful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. McKenna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles