World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edith Pomarol-Clotet

Edith Pomarol-Clotet

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
13385
World Ranking
4476
National Ranking
64

Edith Pomarol-Clotet publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith Pomarol-Clotet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 312 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Edith Pomarol-Clotet D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith Pomarol-Clotet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edith Pomarol-Clotet is affiliated with Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers in Spain. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology, and Genetics. The body of work includes examination of multiple aspects related to psychiatric disorders and advanced neuroimaging techniques.

The main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Edith Pomarol-Clotet has collaborated frequently with several researchers in the field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Raymond Salvador
  • Salvador Sarró
  • Paola Fuentes-Claramonte
  • Eduard Vieta
  • Mar Fatjó-Vilas

Their work has appeared often in certain scientific journals and venues, with the most frequent publication outlets including:

  • Neuroscience Applied
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Selected recent papers by Edith Pomarol-Clotet, including the year of publication and venue, are:

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA, 2020, NeuroImage
  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Brain ageing in schizophrenia: evidence from 26 international cohorts via the ENIGMA Schizophrenia consortium, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Deep brain stimulation in treatment resistant schizophrenia: A pilot randomized cross-over clinical trial, 2020, EBioMedicine
  • Longitudinal Structural Brain Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study of 1232 Individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2021, Biological Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium

    Unknown

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Anisotropic kernels for coordinate-based meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies.

    Joaquim Radua;Katya Rubia;Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez;Edith Pomarol-Clotet

  • Failure to deactivate in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: dysfunction of the default mode network?

    E. Pomarol-Clotet;R. Salvador;S. Sarró;J. Gomar

  • Clozapine alone versus clozapine and risperidone with refractory schizophrenia.

    William G. Honer;Allen E. Thornton;Eric Y.H. Chen;Raymond C.K. Chan

  • Modafinil Improves Cognition and Attentional Set Shifting in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia

    Danielle C Turner;Luke Clark;Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Peter McKenna

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years

    Sophia Frangou;Amirhossein Modabbernia;Steven C. R. Williams;Efstathios Papachristou

  • Psychological effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers. Phenomenological study.

    E. Pomarol-Clotet;G. D. Honey;G. K. Murray;P. R. Corlett

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.

    Joaquim Radua;Eduard Vieta;Russell Shinohara;Peter Kochunov

  • A simple view of the brain through a frequency-specific functional connectivity measure

    Raymond Salvador;A. Martínez;Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Jesús J. Gomar

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Functional dysconnectivity in schizophrenia associated with attentional modulation of motor function

    Garry D. Honey;Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Philip R. Corlett;Rebekah A. E. Honey

  • Widespread white matter microstructural abnormalities in bipolar disorder: evidence from mega- and meta-analyses across 3033 individuals

    Pauline Favre;Pauline Favre;Melissa Pauling;Melissa Pauling;Jacques Stout;Franz Hozer

  • Frontal responses during learning predict vulnerability to the psychotogenic effects of ketamine: Linking cognition, brain activity, and psychosis

    Philip R. Corlett;Garry D. Honey;Michael R. F. Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

  • Medial prefrontal cortex pathology in schizophrenia as revealed by convergent findings from multimodal imaging

    E Pomarol-Clotet;E J Canales-Rodríguez;R Salvador;S Sarró

  • Semantic priming in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    E. Pomarol-Clotet;T. M. S. S. Oh;K. R. Laws;P. J. McKenna

  • Overall brain connectivity maps show cortico-subcortical abnormalities in schizophrenia

    Raymond Salvador;Salvador Sarró;Jesús J. Gomar;Jordi Ortiz-Gil

  • Validation of the Word Accentuation Test (TAP) as a means of estimating premorbid IQ in Spanish speakers

    Jesús J. Gomar;Jordi Ortiz-Gil;Peter J. McKenna;Raymond Salvador

  • Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group

    Abraham Nunes;Hugo G. Schnack;Christopher R.K. Ching;Christopher R.K. Ching;Ingrid Agartz

  • Validity of modulation and optimal settings for advanced voxel-based morphometry

    Joaquim Radua;Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez;Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Raymond Salvador

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. McKenna
Peter J. McKenna Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers
Raymond Salvador
Raymond Salvador Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers
Salvador Sarró
Salvador Sarró Institut Sarró
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Jose Manuel Goikolea
Jose Manuel Goikolea University of Barcelona
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
David C. Glahn
David C. Glahn Boston Children's Hospital
Fleur M. Howells
Fleur M. Howells University of Cape Town
Janice M. Fullerton
Janice M. Fullerton University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Edith Pomarol-Clotet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles