World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
31
Citations
8509
World Ranking
8169
National Ranking
636

Tracey J. Regan publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracey J. Regan sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tracey J. Regan D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracey J. Regan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tracey J. Regan is affiliated with the Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with contributions spanning ecological modeling, ecology, economics and econometrics, nature and landscape conservation, and global and planetary change.

The main topics of Regan's work include species distribution and climate change, economic and environmental valuation, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, zoonotic diseases and public health, the Delphi technique in research, and conservation, biodiversity, and resource management.

Regan has coauthored multiple papers with several frequent collaborators, including Friederike C. Bolam, Louise Mair, Marco Angelico, Thomas M. Brooks, and Mark A. Burgman.

Their recent publications reflect a range of environmental and conservation issues. These include:

  • Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation (2020, Biological Conservation)
  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented? (2020, Conservation Letters)
  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented? (2020, bioRxiv - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Using decision science to evaluate global biodiversity indices (2020, Conservation Biology)
  • Spatial conservation action planning in heterogeneous landscapes (2020, Biological Conservation)

Regan's research has been published predominantly in journals such as Biological Conservation, Conservation Letters, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Conservation Biology, and Nature Climate Change.

Best Publications

  • Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

    A. Guisan;R. Tingley;J. B. Baumgartner;I. Naujokaitis-Lewis

  • Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

    Antoine Guisan;Reid Tingley;John B. Baumgartner;Ilona Naujokaitis‐Lewis

  • Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems.

    David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Jon Paul Rodríguez;Kathryn M. Rodríguez-Clark;Emily Nicholson

  • Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation.

    Richard T. Corlett;Richard B. Primack;Vincent Devictor;Bea Maas

  • Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant.

    Tracey J. Regan;Michael A. McCarthy;Peter W. J. Baxter;Peter W. J. Baxter;F. Dane Panetta

  • Plant extinction risk under climate change: are forecast range shifts alone a good indicator of species vulnerability to global warming?

    Damien A. Fordham;H. Resit Akçakaya;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Jane Elith

  • The IUCN red list of ecosystems: Motivations, challenges, and applications

    David A. Keith;Jon Paul Rodríguez;Thomas M. Brooks;Mark A. Burgman

  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented

    Friederike C. Bolam;Louise Mair;Marco Angelico;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks

  • Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models: matching methods to applications

    Natalie J. Briscoe;Jane Elith;Roberto Salguero‐Gómez;Roberto Salguero‐Gómez;Roberto Salguero‐Gómez;José J. Lahoz‐Monfort

  • A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.

    Jon Paul Rodriguez;David A Keith;Kathryn M Rodriguez-Clark;Nicholas J Murray

  • Ecological-economic optimization of biodiversity conservation under climate change

    Brendan A. Wintle;Sarah A. Bekessy;David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Brian W. van Wilgen

  • Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria

    David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Michael Mahony;Harry Hines;Jane Elith

  • Comparing predictions of extinction risk using models and subjective judgement

    Michael A. McCarthy;Michael A. McCarthy;David Keith;Justine Tietjen;Mark A. Burgman

  • The Consistency of Extinction Risk Classification Protocols

    Tracey J. Regan;Mark A. Burgman;Michael A. McCARTHY;Lawrence L. Master

  • Developing a standardized definition of ecosystem collapse for risk assessment

    Lucie M Bland;Lucie M Bland;Jessica A Rowland;Tracey J Regan;Tracey J Regan;David A Keith;David A Keith;David A Keith

  • Optimally managing under imperfect detection: A method for plant invasions

    Tracey J. Regan;Iadine Chadès;Iadine Chadès;Hugh P. Possingham

  • Protocols for listing threatened species can forecast extinction

    David A. Keith;Michael A. McCarthy;Michael A. McCarthy;Helen Regan;Tracey Regan

  • Capturing expert knowledge for threatened species assessments: a case study using NatureServe conservation status ranks

    Tracey J. Regan;Lawrence L. Master;Geoffrey A. Hammerson

  • The Roles of Spatial Heterogeneity and Ecological Processes in Conservation Planning

    Hugh P. Possingham;Janet Franklin;Kerrie Wilson;Tracey J. Regan

  • Correlations among Extinction Risks Assessed by Different Systems of Threatened Species Categorization

    Julian J. O'grady;Mark A. Burgman;David A. Keith;Lawrence L. Master

  • Niche models tell half the story: spatial context and life‐history traits influence species responses to global change

    Rebecca M. Swab;Rebecca M. Swab;Helen M. Regan;David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Tracey J. Regan

  • Using multiple lines of evidence to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse.

    Lucie M. Bland;Tracey J. Regan;Minh Ngoc Dinh;Renata Ferrari

  • Effects of uncertainty and variability on population declines and IUCN Red List classifications

    Pamela Rueda-Cediel;Pamela Rueda-Cediel;Kurt E. Anderson;Tracey J. Regan;Tracey J. Regan;Helen M. Regan

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Keith
David A. Keith University of New South Wales
Michael A. McCarthy
Michael A. McCarthy University of Melbourne
Mark A. Burgman
Mark A. Burgman Imperial College London
Emily Nicholson
Emily Nicholson Deakin University
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Helen M. Regan
Helen M. Regan University of California, Riverside
Brendan A. Wintle
Brendan A. Wintle University of Melbourne
Jane Elith
Jane Elith University of Melbourne
Jon Paul Rodríguez
Jon Paul Rodríguez Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in health and life sciences can open diverse career pathways for students interested in Ecology and Evolution. Many begin with foundational nursing programs, and for those seeking flexibility, the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs offer a fast-track option to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. These programs are cost-effective and designed for quick entry into healthcare careers.

If you're looking to advance, there are also rn to bsn 6 months courses available online, which provide a rapid path for registered nurses to earn their BSN. Many graduates then consider specialized roles, such as nurse practitioner, and often ask, how to become a np. Online programs allow students to complete requirements efficiently while balancing other commitments.

Understanding potential salaries is essential in planning your career. For those considering psychiatric nursing, learn how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make and compare compensation by state. With the right online degree, you can create a flexible pathway suited to your interests in health, ecology, or evolutionary science.

Best Scientists Citing Tracey J. Regan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles