World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
68
Citations
22356
World Ranking
1501
National Ranking
550

H. Resit Akçakaya publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Resit Akçakaya sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 151 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

H. Resit Akçakaya D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Resit Akçakaya sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

H. Resit Akçakaya is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a strong emphasis on ecological modeling, ecology, and nature and landscape conservation. Additional subfields include global and planetary change as well as management, monitoring, policy, and law related to environmental topics.

The scientist's work covers a broad spectrum of topics including species distribution and climate change, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, environmental conservation and management, plant and animal studies, economic and environmental valuation, and avian ecology and behavior.

Frequent publication venues for Akçakaya include Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation, Oryx, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Global Change Biology. The scientist's research output often appears in Conservation Biology, with six publications recorded in that journal alone.

Among recent papers, notable titles include:

  • Generation lengths of the world's birds and their implications for extinction risk (2020, Conservation Biology)
  • Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments (2022, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  • Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact (2021, Conservation Biology)
  • Over half of threatened species require targeted recovery actions to avert human-induced extinction (2022, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment)
  • Process-explicit models reveal pathway to extinction for woolly mammoth using pattern-oriented validation (2021, Ecology Letters)

Akçakaya has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers. The most common coauthors include Michael Hoffmann, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Thomas M. Brooks, Molly K. Grace, and Barney Long.

Best Publications

  • The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates

    Michael Hoffmann;Craig Hilton-Taylor;Ariadne Angulo;Monika Böhm

  • Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species

    Georgina M. Mace;Nigel J. Collar;Kevin J. Gaston;Craig Hilton-Taylor

  • Assessing species' vulnerability to climate change

    Michela Pacifici;Michela Pacifici;Wendy B. Foden;Wendy B. Foden;Piero Visconti;Piero Visconti;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson

  • Identifying the World's Most Climate Change Vulnerable Species: A Systematic Trait-Based Assessment of all Birds, Amphibians and Corals

    Wendy B. Foden;Wendy B. Foden;Stuart H. M. Butchart;Simon N. Stuart;Jean-Christophe Vié

  • Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology

    Brook Bw;O'Grady Jj;Chapman Ap;Burgman Ma

  • Global Gap Analysis: Priority Regions for Expanding the Global Protected-Area Network

    Ana S. L. Rodrigues;H. Resit Akçakaya;Sandy J. Andelman;Mohamed I. Bakarr

  • Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models.

    David A Keith;H. Resit Akçakaya;Wilfried Thuiller;Guy F Midgley

  • Measuring Global Trends in the Status of Biodiversity: Red List Indices for Birds

    Stuart H. M Butchart;Alison J Stattersfield;Leon A Bennun;Sue M Shutes

  • Climate change vulnerability assessment of species

    Wendy B. Foden;Wendy B. Foden;Bruce E. Young;Bruce E. Young;H. Resit Akçakaya;H. Resit Akçakaya;Raquel A. Garcia;Raquel A. Garcia

  • Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change

    Richard G. Pearson;Richard G. Pearson;Jessica C. Stanton;Kevin T. Shoemaker;Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens

  • Improvements to the Red List Index.

    Stuart H.M. Butchart;H. Resit Akçakaya;Janice Chanson;Jonathan E.M. Baillie

  • Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change

    B.J Anderson;H.R Akçakaya;M.B Araújo;D.A Fordham

  • Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty

    H. Reşit Akçakaya;Scott Ferson;Mark A. Burgman;David A. Keith

  • Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond.

    S.H.M Butchart;A.J Stattersfield;J Baillie;L.A Bennun

  • Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes: A Case for Ratio-Dependent Predation Models

    Roger Arditi;Lev R. Ginzburg;H. Resit Akcakaya

  • Ratio-Dependent Predation: An Abstraction That Works

    H. Resit Akcakaya;Roger Arditi;Lev R. Ginzburg

  • Measuring Terrestrial Area of Habitat (AOH) and Its Utility for the IUCN Red List.

    Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Stuart L. Pimm;H. Resit Akçakaya;Graeme M. Buchanan

  • Generation lengths of the world's birds and their implications for extinction risk

    Jeremy P. Bird;Jeremy P. Bird;Robert Martin;H. Reşit Akçakaya;H. Reşit Akçakaya;James Gilroy

  • Plant extinction risk under climate change: are forecast range shifts alone a good indicator of species vulnerability to global warming?

    Damien A. Fordham;H. Resit Akçakaya;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Jane Elith

  • Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity

    H. Resit Akçakaya;Stuart H. M. Butchart;Georgina M. Mace;Simon N. Stuart

  • Consequences of Ratio‐Dependent Predation for Steady‐State Properties of Ecosystems

    Lev R. Ginzburg;H. Resit Akcakaya

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Keith
David A. Keith University of New South Wales
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Stuart H. M. Butchart BirdLife international, UK
Craig Hilton-Taylor
Craig Hilton-Taylor IUCN Red List
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Michael R. Hoffmann
Michael R. Hoffmann California Institute of Technology
Barry W. Brook
Barry W. Brook University of Tasmania
Richard G. Pearson
Richard G. Pearson University College London
Georgina M. Mace
Georgina M. Mace University College London
Helen M. Regan
Helen M. Regan University of California, Riverside
Damien A. Fordham
Damien A. Fordham University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads to interdisciplinary interests across science, psychology, and human services. For those considering flexible, online study options, it's worth noting that many students supplement their education in these fields by pursuing programs like the cheapest masters in counseling online. Such programs can foster key skills in communication, mental health awareness, and community engagement.

Students interested in the scientific study of behavior and well-being may also benefit from accredited online clinical psychology programs. These courses provide a strong foundation in research methods and applied psychology, which are increasingly relevant in environmental education and advocacy.

If your interests intersect with social work or advocacy, you might consider enrolling in one of the masters in human services online. These degrees enable graduates to work within communities or organizations that address both environmental and human needs.

Finally, careers such as speech-language pathology blend communication science with education and human development. To learn more about this path, explore what is an slp in education and see how such expertise can align with ecological or educational outreach roles.

Best Scientists Citing H. Resit Akçakaya

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles