World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
17151
World Ranking
2183
National Ranking
242

Paul Moran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Moran sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 236 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul Moran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Moran sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Moran is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom and works primarily in the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research output is concentrated in clinical psychology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry and mental health, and health, toxicology and mutagenesis.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas including suicide and self-harm studies, personality disorders and psychopathology, COVID-19 and mental health, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, schizophrenia research and treatment, as well as health disparities and outcomes.

Paul Moran's frequent co-authors include David Gunnell, Lucy Biddle, Becky Mars, Navneet Kapur, and Helen Bould, reflecting collaborations across multiple studies in mental health and related fields.

The venues where Moran most frequently publishes their research include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BJPsych Open
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Some of the recent papers associated with Paul Moran are:

  • "Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts" (2020), published in The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review" (2021), published in F1000Research
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review" (2020), published in F1000Research
  • "Is social media screen time really associated with poor adolescent mental health? A time use diary study" (2020), published in Journal of Affective Disorders

Best Publications

  • Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    David Gunnell;Louis Appleby;Ella Arensman;Keith Hawton

  • The natural history of self-harm from adolescence to young adulthood: a population-based cohort study

    Paul A Moran;Carolyn Coffey;Helena Romaniuk;Craig A. Olsson

  • The prognosis of common mental disorders in adolescents: a 14-year prospective cohort study

    George C Patton;George C Patton;Carolyn Coffey;Helena Romaniuk;Helena Romaniuk;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Therapeutic Interventions for Suicide Attempts and Self-Harm in Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Dennis Ougrin;Troy Tranah;Daniel Stahl;Paul Moran

  • Predictors of future suicide attempt among adolescents with suicidal thoughts or non-suicidal self-harm: a population-based birth cohort study

    Becky Mars;Becky Mars;Jon Heron;E David Klonsky;Paul Moran;Paul Moran

  • Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder.

    Paul Moran;Morven Leese;Tennyson Lee;Paul Walters

  • Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts.

    Alex S F Kwong;Rebecca M Pearson;Mark J Adams;Kate Northstone

  • Help-seeking behaviour and adolescent self-harm: A systematic review

    Sarah L. Rowe;Rebecca S. French;Claire Henderson;Dennis Ougrin

  • The role of callous and unemotional traits in the diagnosis of conduct disorder

    Richard Rowe;Barbara Maughan;Paul A Moran;Tamsin Ford

  • Prevalence of violent victimisation in severe mental illness.

    Elizabeth Walsh;Paul A Moran;Paul A Moran;Charles Scott;Kwame McKenzie

  • Life expectancy at birth and all-cause mortality among people with personality disorder.

    Marcella Lei Yee Fok;Richard D. Hayes;Chin Kuo Chang;Robert Stewart

  • Psychopathy among prisoners in England and Wales

    Jeremy W. Coid;Min Yang;Simone Ullrich;Amanda D.L. Roberts

  • Prenatal screening and diagnosis of neural tube defects

    Martin Cameron;Paul Moran

  • The Challenge of Transforming the Diagnostic System of Personality Disorders.

    Sabine C. Herpertz;Steven K. Huprich;Martin Bohus;Andrew Chanen

  • The prevalence of personality disorder among UK primary care attenders

    P Moran;R Jenkins;A Tylee;RA Blizard

  • The application of mHealth to mental health: opportunities and challenges

    Lisa Marzano;Andrew Bardill;Bob Fields;Kate Herd

  • Impact of comorbid personality disorder on violence in psychosis: Report from the UK700 trial

    Paul Moran;Elizabeth Walsh;Peter Tyrer;Tom Burns

  • The epidemiology of antisocial personality disorder.

    P. Moran

  • What distinguishes adolescents with suicidal thoughts from those who have attempted suicide? A population-based birth cohort study.

    Becky Mars;Jon Heron;E. David Klonsky;Paul Moran;Paul Moran

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review

    Ann John;Emily Eyles;Emily Eyles;Roger T Webb;Roger T Webb;Chukwudi Okolie

  • Morbid risk of schizophrenia in first-degree relatives of white and African-Caribbean patients with psychosis.

    G. Hutchinson;N. Takei;T. A. Fahy;D. Bhugra

  • The Correlates of Comorbid Antisocial Personality Disorder in Schizophrenia

    Paul A Moran;Paul A Moran;Sheilagh Hodgins

  • Violence and psychiatric morbidity in a national household population--a report from the British Household Survey

    Jeremy Coid;Min Yang;Amanda Roberts;Simone Ullrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Rohan Borschmann
Rohan Borschmann University of Melbourne
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
George C. Patton
George C. Patton Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Mike J. Crawford
Mike J. Crawford Imperial College London
Louise M. Howard
Louise M. Howard King's College London
Robert Stewart
Robert Stewart King's College London
John B. Carlin
John B. Carlin University of Melbourne
Anthony Mann
Anthony Mann King's College London
Peter Tyrer
Peter Tyrer Imperial College London
Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous online degree programs that can lead to rewarding career pathways. One in-demand area is substance abuse counseling, where professionals help individuals overcome addiction and reclaim their lives. The journey to becoming a counselor in this field often starts with a relevant degree and involves understanding state-specific requirements.

For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Albuquerque emphasize both education and supervised clinical experience. If you’re interested in the West Coast, learning about the process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Anaheim will show how California’s regulations may differ from other states.

For those considering opportunities in Alaska, it’s important to review Anchorage substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Meanwhile, in Texas, Arlington substance abuse counselor certification requirements provide another example of how certification expectations can vary nationwide.

With flexible online degree options and a wide range of regional requirements, earning a psychology degree is a great starting point for those aiming to make a positive impact as a substance abuse counselor in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Moran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles