World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
15870
World Ranking
6031
National Ranking
2713

Ramón Cáceres publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramón Cáceres sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ramón Cáceres D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramón Cáceres sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Ramón Cáceres is a researcher affiliated with Google in the United States. The work documented reflects engagement with pervasive computing and edge technologies, contributing to the understanding of computing paradigms that operate closer to data sources rather than centralized cloud systems.

Their recent publication includes the paper titled "Pervasive Computing at the Edge" published in 2020 in the IEEE Pervasive Computing journal. This publication has been cited in academic works, indicating its presence within the research landscape.

Collaborative research has been conducted with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Paramvir Bahl
  • Nigel Davies
  • Roy Want

The primary venue for publishing research findings has been IEEE Pervasive Computing, where contributions on the topic of pervasive computing have appeared.

Ramón Cáceres was awarded the ACM Distinguished Member recognition in 2006, an award that denotes membership status granted by the Association for Computing Machinery based on professional accomplishments.

Best Publications

  • The Case for VM-Based Cloudlets in Mobile Computing

    M. Satyanarayanan;P. Bahl;R. Caceres;N. Davies

  • Improving the performance of reliable transport protocols in mobile computing environments

    R. Caceres;L. Iftode

  • vTPM: virtualizing the trusted platform module

    Stefan Berger;Ramón Cáceres;Kenneth A. Goldman;Ronald Perez

  • Multicast-based inference of network-internal loss characteristics

    R. Caceres;N.G. Duffield;J. Horowitz;D.F. Towsley

  • Identifying important places in people's lives from cellular network data

    Sibren Isaacman;Richard Becker;Ramón Cáceres;Stephen Kobourov

  • RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)

    T. Friedman;R. Caceres;A. Clark

  • Building a MAC-based security architecture for the Xen open-source hypervisor

    R. Sailer;T. Jaeger;E. Valdez;R. Caceres

  • Characteristics of wide-area TCP/IP conversations

    Ramón Cáceres;Peter B. Danzig;Sugih Jamin;Danny J. Mitzel

  • Storage alternatives for mobile computers

    Fred Douglis;Ramón Cáceres;Frans Kaashoek;Kai Li

  • Human mobility characterization from cellular network data

    Richard Becker;Ramón Cáceres;Karrie Hanson;Sibren Isaacman

  • A Tale of One City: Using Cellular Network Data for Urban Planning

    R. A. Becker;R. Caceres;K. Hanson;J. M. Loh

  • Fast and scalable handoffs for wireless internetworks

    Ramón Cáceres;Venkata N. Padmanabhan

  • Human mobility modeling at metropolitan scales

    Sibren Isaacman;Richard Becker;Ramón Cáceres;Margaret Martonosi

  • Performance of Web proxy caching in heterogeneous bandwidth environments

    A. Feldmann;R. Caceres;F. Douglis;G. Glass

  • Web proxy caching: the devil is in the details

    Ramón Cáceres;Fred Douglis;Anja Feldmann;Gideon Glass

  • The use of end-to-end multicast measurements for characterizing internal network behavior

    A. Adams;Tian Bu;T. Friedman;J. Horowitz

  • TVDc: managing security in the trusted virtual datacenter

    Stefan Berger;Ramón Cáceres;Dimitrios Pendarakis;Reiner Sailer

  • An Empirical Workload Model for Driving Wide-Area TCP/IP Network Simulations

    Peter B. Danzig;Sugih Jamin;Ramón Cáceres;Danny J. Mitzel

  • Ubicomp Systems at 20: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges

    R. Caceres;A. Friday

  • Efficient policies for carrying Web traffic over flow-switched networks

    Anja Feldmann;Jennifer Rexford;Ramón Cáceres

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Varshavsky
Alexander Varshavsky Google (United States)
Reiner Sailer
Reiner Sailer IBM (United States)
Nick Duffield
Nick Duffield Texas A&M University
Trent Jaeger
Trent Jaeger Pennsylvania State University
Don Towsley
Don Towsley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Anja Feldmann
Anja Feldmann Max Planck Society
Margaret Martonosi
Margaret Martonosi Princeton University
Landon P. Cox
Landon P. Cox Duke University
Steven M. Bellovin
Steven M. Bellovin Columbia University
Fred Douglis
Fred Douglis Peraton Labs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech professionals continues to grow, flexible education options are more important than ever. Many students and working adults are turning to associates degrees online to build foundational skills in computer science and enter IT careers quickly. These programs are ideal for those seeking an entry point or looking to transfer credits toward a four-year degree.

For individuals considering graduate studies, there are opportunities to save time with shortest masters degree programs, which can often be completed in one year or less. Choosing one of the most valuable masters degrees in technology or related fields can significantly boost earning potential and job prospects in competitive sectors like data science or cybersecurity.

Budget-conscious students should also consider the wide variety of affordable online degree programs now available across the US. These programs make it possible to earn a respected credential with minimal financial strain, supporting both upskilling and career advancement in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Ramón Cáceres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles