World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
12981
World Ranking
10455
National Ranking
4370

Landon P. Cox publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Landon P. Cox sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Landon P. Cox D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Landon P. Cox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Landon P. Cox is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed to the field of computer science, focusing primarily on areas such as computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, and information systems. Their research covers topics including IoT and edge/fog computing, cloud computing and resource management, caching and content delivery, hermeneutics and narrative identity, aging and elder care social issues, as well as advanced steganography and watermarking techniques.

Key recent publications authored or co-authored by Landon P. Cox include:

  • "The birth and rebirth of the glitch" (2024), published in RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library)
  • "2023 ACM Fellow: Stefan Saroiu, Microsoft." (2024), published in GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications
  • "The Emerging Landscape of Edge Computing" (2020), published in GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications
  • "Amadeus: Scalable, Privacy-Preserving Live Video Analytics" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "BumbleBee: Application-aware adaptation for container orchestration" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Landon P. Cox frequently publishes in venues such as GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications, arXiv (Cornell University), and RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).

The list of frequent co-authors includes:

  • Shadi A. Noghabi
  • Sharad Agarwal
  • Ganesh Ananthanarayanan
  • Sandeep D'souza
  • Victor Bahl

Landon P. Cox has been recognized by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) with the Distinguished Member award in 2019. Their work spans interdisciplinary fields linking technical computer science topics with social and philosophical aspects, as evidenced by research in hermeneutics, narrative identity, and social issues related to aging and elder care.

Best Publications

  • TaintDroid: An Information-Flow Tracking System for Realtime Privacy Monitoring on Smartphones

    William Enck;Peter Gilbert;Seungyeop Han;Vasant Tendulkar

  • TaintDroid: an information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones

    William Enck;Peter Gilbert;Byung-Gon Chun;Landon P. Cox

  • Micro-Blog: sharing and querying content through mobile phones and social participation

    Shravan Gaonkar;Jack Li;Romit Roy Choudhury;Landon Cox

  • Pastiche: making backup cheap and easy

    Landon P. Cox;Christopher D. Murray;Brian D. Noble

  • TaintDroid: an information flow tracking system for real-time privacy monitoring on smartphones

    William Enck;Peter Gilbert;Byung-Gon Chun;Landon P. Cox

  • EnLoc: Energy-Efficient Localization for Mobile Phones

    I. Constandache;S. Gaonkar;M. Sayler;R. R. Choudhury

  • Samsara: honor among thieves in peer-to-peer storage

    Landon P. Cox;Brian D. Noble

  • Vision: automated security validation of mobile apps at app markets

    Peter Gilbert;Byung-Gon Chun;Landon P. Cox;Jaeyeon Jung

  • Toward trustworthy mobile sensing

    Peter Gilbert;Landon P. Cox;Jaeyeon Jung;David Wetherall

  • LiveCompare: grocery bargain hunting through participatory sensing

    Linda Deng;Landon P. Cox

  • SMILE: encounter-based trust for mobile social services

    Justin Manweiler;Ryan Scudellari;Landon P. Cox

  • SmokeScreen: flexible privacy controls for presence-sharing

    Landon P. Cox;Angela Dalton;Varun Marupadi

  • Vis-à-Vis: Privacy-preserving online social networking via Virtual Individual Servers

    Amre Shakimov;Harold Lim;Ramon Caceres;Landon P. Cox

  • Tightlip: keeping applications from spilling the beans

    Aydan R. Yumerefendi;Benjamin Mickle;Landon P. Cox

  • Design patterns: an essential component of CS curricula

    Owen Astrachan;Garrett Mitchener;Geoffrey Berry;Landon Cox

  • Peer-to-peer method and system for performing and managing backups in a network of nodes

    Brian D. Noble;Landon P. Cox

  • Pocket Hypervisors: Opportunities and Challenges

    L.P. Cox;P.M. Chen

  • The Impact of Dynamically Heterogeneous Multicore Processors on Thread Scheduling

    F.A. Bower;D.J. Sorin;L.P. Cox

  • Privacy, cost, and availability tradeoffs in decentralized OSNs

    Amre Shakimov;Alexander Varshavsky;Landon P. Cox;Ramón Cáceres

  • Virtual individual servers as privacy-preserving proxies for mobile devices

    Ramón Cáceres;Landon Cox;Harold Lim;Amre Shakimov

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian D. Noble
Brian D. Noble University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ashwin Machanavajjhala
Ashwin Machanavajjhala Duke University
Ramón Cáceres
Ramón Cáceres Google (United States)
Alexander Varshavsky
Alexander Varshavsky Google (United States)
Byung-Gon Chun
Byung-Gon Chun Seoul National University
Ganesh Ananthanarayanan
Ganesh Ananthanarayanan Microsoft (United States)
Romit Roy Choudhury
Romit Roy Choudhury University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison
William Enck
William Enck North Carolina State University
Daniel J. Sorin
Daniel J. Sorin Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA can unlock a range of interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students find that complementary fields—such as engineering, physics, and data science—offer exciting online degree pathways that can expand your skill set.

For instance, an environmental engineering degree online allows you to blend computer science with sustainability and environmental problem-solving. Alternatively, if you want a strong foundation in mechanics and design, consider the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online for a cost-effective entry point into in-demand technical fields.

More mathematically inclined students may look to a physics degree online, which reinforces analytical thinking valuable for computational roles. Meanwhile, the fast-growing tech industry continues to offer great opportunities for graduates of data science programs, where data analysis and machine learning skills are highly sought after.

Exploring these related degrees and career pathways online can help you customize your educational journey and broaden your professional prospects in a rapidly evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Landon P. Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles