World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
9472
World Ranking
11008
National Ranking
4581

Franziska Roesner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franziska Roesner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 107 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Franziska Roesner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franziska Roesner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Franziska Roesner is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans fields within Social Sciences and Computer Science, with a focus on several interdisciplinary subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Communication, and Safety Research.

The main topics addressed in their research include Privacy, Security, and Data Protection; Misinformation and Its Impacts; Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection; COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing; Security and Verification in Computing; Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data; and Topic Modeling.

Recent publications by Franziska Roesner cover a variety of these topics and are as follows:

  • "Smart Devices in Airbnbs: Considering Privacy and Security for both Guests and Hosts" (2020), Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • "COVID-19 Contact Tracing and Privacy: Studying Opinion and Preferences" (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins" (2024), Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
  • "Misinfo Reaction Frames: Reasoning about Readers' Reactions to News Headlines" (2022), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • "Principles Matter" (2022), Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Franziska Roesner frequently collaborates with several coauthors, with the most regular collaborators including:

  • Tadayoshi Kohno (17 joint publications)
  • Mattea Sim (4 joint publications)
  • Kurt Hugenberg (4 joint publications)
  • Umar Iqbal (3 joint publications)
  • Lucy Simko (3 joint publications)

Their work is regularly published in prominent venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 17 publications
  • IEEE Security & Privacy (3 publications)
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2 publications)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (2 publications)
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (1 publication)

Franziska Roesner's research contributes to an understanding of privacy and security challenges in computing technologies, especially in areas such as digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation, and privacy-preserving technologies. Their interdisciplinary approach integrates social sciences perspectives with technical advancements in artificial intelligence and information systems.

Best Publications

  • Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile

    Karl Koscher;Alexei Czeskis;Franziska Roesner;Shwetak Patel

  • Comprehensive experimental analyses of automotive attack surfaces

    Stephen Checkoway;Damon McCoy;Brian Kantor;Danny Anderson

  • Detecting and defending against third-party tracking on the web

    Franziska Roesner;Tadayoshi Kohno;David Wetherall

  • Defending Against Neural Fake News

    Rowan Zellers;Ari Holtzman;Hannah Rashkin;Yonatan Bisk

  • Security and privacy for augmented reality systems

    Franziska Roesner;Tadayoshi Kohno;David Molnar

  • User-Driven Access Control: Rethinking Permission Granting in Modern Operating Systems

    F. Roesner;T. Kohno;A. Moshchuk;B. Parno

  • End User Security and Privacy Concerns with Smart Homes

    Eric Zeng;Shrirang Mare;Franziska Roesner

  • Toys that Listen: A Study of Parents, Children, and Internet-Connected Toys

    Emily McReynolds;Sarah Hubbard;Timothy Lau;Aditya Saraf

  • Internet Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Trackers: An Archaeological Study of Web Tracking from 1996 to 2016

    Adam Lerner;Anna Kornfeld Simpson;Tadayoshi Kohno;Franziska Roesner

  • Who's In Control?: Interactions In Multi-User Smart Homes

    Christine Geeng;Franziska Roesner

  • Towards Security and Privacy for Multi-user Augmented Reality: Foundations with End Users

    Kiron Lebeck;Kimberly Ruth;Tadayoshi Kohno;Franziska Roesner

  • Sex, Lies, or Kittens? Investigating the Use of Snapchat’s Self-Destructing Messages

    Franziska Roesner;Brian T. Gill;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • Fake News on Facebook and Twitter: Investigating How People (Don't) Investigate

    Christine Geeng;Savanna Yee;Franziska Roesner

  • World-Driven Access Control for Continuous Sensing

    Franziska Roesner;David Molnar;Alexander Moshchuk;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • Collaborative Verification of Information Flow for a High-Assurance App Store

    Michael D. Ernst;René Just;Suzanne Millstein;Werner Dietl

  • Securing Augmented Reality Output

    Kiron Lebeck;Kimberly Ruth;Tadayoshi Kohno;Franziska Roesner

  • Securing embedded user interfaces: Android and beyond

    Franziska Roesner;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • Securing vulnerable home IoT devices with an in-hub security manager

    Anna Kornfeld Simpson;Franziska Roesner;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • The Privacy-Utility Tradeoff for Remotely Teleoperated Robots

    Daniel J. Butler;Justin Huang;Franziska Roesner;Maya Cakmak

  • Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in {Multi-User} Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and {In-Home} User Study

    Eric Zeng;Franziska Roesner

  • Defending Against Neural Fake News

    Rowan Zellers;Ari Holtzman;Hannah Rashkin;Yonatan Bisk

  • Investigating the computer security practices and needs of journalists

    Susan E. McGregor;Polina Charters;Tobin Holliday;Franziska Roesner

Frequent Co-Authors

Tadayoshi Kohno
Tadayoshi Kohno University of Washington
David Molnar
David Molnar Microsoft (United States)
Yejin Choi
Yejin Choi Stanford University
Stephen W. Keckler
Stephen W. Keckler Nvidia (United States)
Helen J. Wang
Helen J. Wang Microsoft (United States)
Doug Burger
Doug Burger Microsoft (United States)
Bryan Parno
Bryan Parno Carnegie Mellon University
Eyal Ofek
Eyal Ofek Microsoft (United States)
Hovav Shacham
Hovav Shacham The University of Texas at Austin
Maarten Sap
Maarten Sap Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up access to many flexible online programs and fast-track career options. One promising route is the data science learning path, which blends computer science with analytics and AI—fields that are in high demand and offer strong job prospects.

For those interested in technology infrastructure or hardware, the online electrical engineering degree ranking highlights top programs that can be completed remotely. These programs are a great fit for students who want a rigorous education with the flexibility of online learning.

Looking for quicker paths into tech? Consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These require less commitment but can rapidly boost your earning potential in fields like IT support, cybersecurity, or web development.

If you already have a bachelor's degree, check out the shortest master degree programs. These accelerated online master's degrees can help you specialize further and qualify for advanced roles, often in a year or less.

Best Scientists Citing Franziska Roesner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles