World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
3818
World Ranking
9208
National Ranking
682

Nick A. Chappell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick A. Chappell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Nick A. Chappell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick A. Chappell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick A. Chappell is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. The primary area of research focuses on environmental science, with a significant concentration in water science and technology, global and planetary change, soil science, environmental engineering, and ecology.

Their research topics primarily cover hydrology and watershed management studies, flood risk assessment and management, soil erosion and sediment transport, hydrology and sediment transport processes, hydrology and drought analysis, groundwater flow and contamination studies, and plant water relations and carbon dynamics.

Nick A. Chappell has contributed to several scientific papers, including:

  • Perceptual perplexity and parameter parsimony, 2021, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • Knowledge gaps in our perceptual model of Great Britain's hydrology, 2021, Hydrological Processes
  • Assessing the significance of wet-canopy evaporation from forests during extreme rainfall events for flood mitigation in mountainous regions of the United Kingdom, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • On (in)validating environmental models. 2. Implementation of a Turing-like test to modelling hydrological processes, 2022, Hydrological Processes
  • Deciding on fitness-for-purpose-of models and of natural flood management, 2022, Hydrological Processes

Frequent co-authors of Nick A. Chappell include:

  • Keith Beven
  • Barry Hankin
  • Trevor Page
  • Ann Kretzschmar
  • Paul J. Smith

The scientist's work has been often published in specific venues, notably:

  • Hydrological Processes
  • Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • Hydrology Research
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Nick A. Chappell's research outputs span diverse environmental research subfields, with a major emphasis placed on understanding hydrological phenomena and processes relevant to flood risk and soil erosion.

Best Publications

  • The hydrology of the humid tropics

    Ellen Wohl;Ana Barros;Nathaniel Brunsell;Nick A. Chappell

  • The Impact of forest use and reforestation on soil hydraulic conductivity in the Western Ghats of India: Implications for surface and sub-surface hydrology

    M. Bonell;B.K. Purandara;B. Venkatesh;Jagdish Krishnaswamy

  • Overview: Oxidant and particle photochemical processes above a south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): Introduction, rationale, location characteristics and tools

    C. N. Hewitt;J. D. Lee;A. R. MacKenzie;M. P. Barkley

  • Forest–flood relation still tenuous – comment on ‘Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world’ by C. J. A. Bradshaw, N.S. Sodi, K. S.‐H. Peh and B.W. Brook

    Albert I. J. M. Van Dijk;Meine Van Noordwijk;Ian R. Calder;Sampurno L. A. Bruijnzeel

  • The role of extreme events in the impacts of selective tropical forestry on erosion during harvesting and recovery phases at Danum Valley, Sabah.

    I. Douglas;K. Bidin;G. Balamurugan;N. A. Chappell

  • Multi-scale permeability estimation for a tropical catchment

    Nick A. Chappell;Stewart W. Franks;Jonny Larenus

  • Modelling rainfall and canopy controls on net-precipitation beneath selectively-logged tropical forest

    Nick A Chappell;Kawi Bidin;Wlodek Tych

  • Correlation of physicochemical properties and sub-erosional landforms with aggregate stability variations in a tropical Ultisol disturbed by forestry operations.

    Nick A. Chappell;J. L. Ternan;K. Bidin

  • Sources of suspended sediment within a tropical catchment recovering from selective logging

    Nick A. Chappell;Ian Douglas;Jamal Mohd Hanapi;Wlodek Tych

  • Soil pipe distribution and hydrological functioning within the humid tropics : a synthesis.

    Nick A. Chappell

  • Parsimonious modelling of water and suspended sediment flux from nested catchments affected by selective tropical forestry.

    Nick A. Chappell;Paul McKenna;K. Bidin;I. Douglas

  • Low path dimensionality and hydrological modelling

    Nick Chappell;J. Les Ternan

  • Forest Environments in the Mekong River Basin.

    Haruo Sawada;Makoto Araki;Nick A. Chappell;James V. LaFrankie

  • Contrasting flow pathways within tropical forest slopes of Ultisol soils

    Nick A. Chappell;Mark D. Sherlock

  • Long-term responses of rainforest erosional systems at different spatial scales to selective logging and climatic change

    R. P. D. Walsh;K. Bidin;W. H. Blake;N. A. Chappell

  • Modelling rainfall and canopy controls on net-precipitation beneath selectively-logged tropical forest

    Unknown

  • Comparison of methodological uncertainties within permeability measurements

    Nick A. Chappell;James W. Lancaster

  • Preliminary analysis of water and solute movement beneath a coniferous hillslope in Mid-Wales, U.K.

    Nick A. Chappell;J. L. Ternan;A. G. Williams;B. Reynolds

  • Biomass variation across selectively logged forest within a 225 km2 region of Borneo and its prediction by Landsat TM

    Hamzah Tangki;Nick A. Chappell

  • Developing observational methods to drive future hydrological science: Can we make a start as a community?

    Keith Beven;Anita Asadullah;Paul Bates;Eleanor Blyth

  • Effects of experimental uncertainty on the calculation of hillslope flow paths

    Mark D Sherlock;Nick A Chappell;Jeffrey J McDonnell

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Beven
Keith Beven Lancaster University
Ian Douglas
Ian Douglas University of Manchester
Rory P. D. Walsh
Rory P. D. Walsh Swansea University
Jagdish Krishnaswamy
Jagdish Krishnaswamy Indian Institute for Human Settlements
Thorsten Wagener
Thorsten Wagener University of Potsdam
John M. C. Plane
John M. C. Plane University of Leeds
David E. Oram
David E. Oram University of East Anglia
Nicola Carslaw
Nicola Carslaw University of York
Hannah Cloke
Hannah Cloke University of Reading
Eiko Nemitz
Eiko Nemitz UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and provide flexible learning options. Many choose to start with a cheap online general studies degree, which offers foundational knowledge while keeping education affordable.

Those seeking a less intensive route might consider some of the easiest bachelor's degree programs that still complement environmental science careers, providing a smoother academic experience without sacrificing relevancy.

Specialized degrees like a geology or geoscience focus are also popular. Students can find excellent options through the best online geology degree programs, which prepare graduates for careers in earth sciences and environmental consulting.

Additionally, expertise in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is highly valued in environmental fields. Pursuing one of the best gis programs online can equip students with crucial technical skills for mapping and spatial analysis roles.

Best Scientists Citing Nick A. Chappell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles