World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine S. Fichten

Catherine S. Fichten

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4410
World Ranking
9618
National Ranking
666

Catherine S. Fichten publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Fichten sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Catherine S. Fichten D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Fichten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine S. Fichten is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on subfields such as human factors and ergonomics, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and safety research.

The main topics addressed in their work include digital accessibility for disabilities, COVID-19 and mental health, disability education and employment, assistive technology in communication and mobility, sleep and related disorders, sleep and wakefulness research, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Catherine S. Fichten include:

  • Alice Havel
  • Mary Jorgensen
  • Eva Libman
  • Sally Bailes
  • Rosie Arcuri

Their publications are often found in these venues:

  • Journal of Education and Training Studies
  • Exceptionality Education International
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Preprints.org
  • Journal of Education and Learning

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Is There an App for That? Apps for Post-Secondary Students With Attention Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)", 2020, Journal of Education and Training Studies
  • "State of the Research on Artificial Intelligence Based Apps for Post-Secondary Students with Disabilities", 2022, Exceptionality Education International
  • "Digital Tools Faculty Expected Students to Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021: Problems and Solutions for Future Hybrid and Blended Courses", 2021, Journal of Education and Training Studies

Additional papers related to broader topics in the field include:

  • "Artificial intelligence for students in postsecondary education", 2020, AI Matters
  • "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on obstructive sleep apnea: recommendations for symptom management", 2020, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

Best Publications

  • How is good and poor sleep in older adults and college students related to daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and ability to concentrate?

    Iris Alapin;Iris Alapin;Catherine S Fichten;Catherine S Fichten;Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Laura Creti

  • Disabilities and e-Learning Problems and Solutions: An Exploratory Study

    Catherine S. Fichten;Vittoria Ferraro;Jennison V. Asuncion;Caroline Chwojka

  • Doxepin and cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in patients with Parkinson's disease – A randomized study

    S. Rios Romenets;L. Creti;C. Fichten;S. Bailes

  • Poor sleepers who do not complain of insomnia: myths and realities about psychological and lifestyle characteristics of older good and poor sleepers

    Catherine S. Fichten;Laura Creti;Rhonda Amsel;William Brender

  • Trait Attributions About College Students With a Physical Disability: Circumplex Analyses and Methodological Issues1

    Catherine S. Fichten;Rhonda Amsel

  • Accessibility of e-Learning and Computer and Information Technologies for Students with Visual Impairments in Postsecondary Education:

    Catherine S. Fichten;Jennison V. Asuncion;Maria Barile;Vittoria Ferraro

  • Brief and distinct empirical sleepiness and fatigue scales.

    Sally Bailes;Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Marc Baltzan;Marc Baltzan;Rhonda Amsel

  • The SSES-E: a measure of sexual self-efficacy in erectile functioning.

    Eva Libman;Ian Rothenberg;Catherine S. Fichten;Rhonda Amsel

  • Sleep Quality and Psychological Adjustment: in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    Myrtis Fossey;Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Sally Bailes;Marc Baltzan;Marc Baltzan

  • Verbal and nonverbal communication cues in daily conversations and dating.

    Catherine S. Fichten;Vicki Tagalakis;Darlene Judd;John Wright

  • Thoughts during awake times in older good and poor sleepers-the Self-Statement Test :60+

    Catherine S. Fichten;Eva Libman;Laura Creti;Rhonda Amsel

  • Sleep Questionnaire Versus Sleep Diary: Which Measure Is Better?

    Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Eva Libman;Catherine S. Fichten;Catherine S. Fichten;Catherine S. Fichten;Sally Bailes;Rhonda Amsel

  • Academic Performance of College Students With and Without Disabilities: An Archival Study

    Shirley Jorgensen;Catherine S. Fichten;Alice Havel;Daniel Lamb

  • Ratio versus frequency scores: Focus of attention and the balance between positive and negative thoughts

    Rhonda Amsel;Catherine S. Fichten

  • Casual interaction between college students with various disabilities and their nondisabled peers: The internal dialogue.

    Catherine S. Fichten;Kristen Robillard;Vicki Tagalakis;Rhonda Amsel

  • Does Volunteering With Children Affect Attitudes Toward Adults With Disabilities? A Prospective Study of Unequal Contact

    Catherine S. Fichten;Fay Schipper;Neil Cutler

  • Time Estimation in Good and Poor Sleepers

    Catherine S. Fichten;Laura Creti;Rhonda Amsel;Sally Bailes

  • A comparison of three therapeutic formats in the treatment of secondary orgasmic dysfunction.

    Eva Libman;Catherine S. Fichten;William Brender;Rosalie Bur stein Msw

  • Access to Educational and Instructional Computer Technologies for Post‐secondary Students with Disabilities: lessons from three empirical studies

    Catherine S. Fichten;Jennison V. Asuncion;Maria Barile;Myrtis Fossey

  • Job Interview Strategies For People with a Visible Disability1

    Vicki Tagalakis;Rhonda Amsel;Catherine S. Fichten

  • Prostatectomy and sexual function.

    Eva Libman;Catherine S. Fichten

Frequent Co-Authors

Rhonda Amsel
Rhonda Amsel McGill University
Stéphane Sabourin
Stéphane Sabourin Université Laval
Phyllis Zelkowitz
Phyllis Zelkowitz McGill University
Gilles J. Lavigne
Gilles J. Lavigne University of Montreal
Yitzchak M. Binik
Yitzchak M. Binik McGill University
Ronald B. Postuma
Ronald B. Postuma McGill University
Jane Seale
Jane Seale The Open University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a variety of online programs and professional career pathways. Many students pursue licensed therapist roles, which require both academic credentials and practical experience. Requirements can vary significantly depending on the state and city in which you wish to practice.

For those interested in becoming a therapist in Texas, it’s important to review the Corpus Christi licensed therapist requirements and the licensed therapist requirements in Dallas, as each location may have different licensing processes, supervised hours, and examination needs. Outside Texas, requirements also differ; the Denver licensed therapist requirements and licensed therapist requirements in Detroit provide valuable insights into the credentials and steps needed in those states.

Whether you’re pursuing online degrees or on-campus options, researching state-specific requirements ensures your education aligns with your career goals. Understanding these pathways helps you prepare for licensure, clinical experience, and long-term success as a professional in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine S. Fichten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles