World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4716
World Ranking
10870
National Ranking
5685

Monroe A. Bruch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monroe A. Bruch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Monroe A. Bruch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monroe A. Bruch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Monroe A. Bruch is affiliated with the State University of New York in the United States. Their academic career includes recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1998.

While there are no recent papers listed or frequent publication venues documented, the affiliation indicates engagement with a significant public university system in the United States, which suggests a role in higher education and research.

There are no recorded frequent co-authors or book publications provided for Monroe A. Bruch. Similarly, detailed data on main fields, subfields, or topics of study have not been shared, limiting an assessment of specific research specializations or domain focus.

The award of Fellow status by the APA implies contributions to psychological science, although the precise nature and scope of research within psychology or related disciplines cannot be ascertained from the current information.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy vs Phenelzine Therapy for Social Phobia: 12-Week Outcome

    Richard G. Heimberg;Michael R. Liebowitz;Debra A. Hope;Franklin R. Schneier

  • Dismantling Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy for social phobia

    Debra A. Hope;Richard G. Heimberg;Monroe A. Bruch

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy versus Phenelzine in Social Phobia: Long-Term Outcome

    Michael R. Liebowitz;Richard G. Heimberg;Richard G. Heimberg;Richard G. Heimberg;Franklin R. Schneier;Franklin R. Schneier;Franklin R. Schneier;Debra A. Hope

  • Shyness and sociability reexamined: a multicomponent analysis

    Monroe A. Bruch;Janet M. Gorsky;Tom M. Collins;Pat A. Berger

  • Differences in perceptions of parental and personal characteristics between generalized and nongeneralized social phobics

    Monroe A. Bruch;Richard G. Heimberg

  • Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Exploration.

    Mary Beth Reed;Monroe A. Bruch;Richard F. Haase

  • Social phobia and perceptions of early parental and personal characteristics

    Monroe A. Bruch;Richard G. Heimberg;Pat Berger;Thomas M. Collins

  • Familial and developmental antecedents of social phobia: Issues and findings

    Monroe A. Bruch

  • The validity of the Social Avoidance and distress Scale and the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale with social phobic patients

    Richard G. Heimberg;Debra A. Hope;Ronald M. Rapee;Monroe A. Bruch

  • Role of perfectionism and Five-Factor model traits in career indecision

    Jennifer Page;Monroe A. Bruch;Richard F. Haase

  • Shyness, alcohol expectancies, and alcohol use: Discovery of a suppressor effect

    Monroe A Bruch;Richard G Heimberg;Carol Harvey;Michael McCann

  • Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy vs Phenelzine Therapy for Social Phobia

    Richard G. Heimberg;Michael R. Liebowitz;Debra A. Hope;Franklin R. Schneier

  • The Role of Personality and Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy in the Career Choice Commitment of College Students:

    Naitian Wang;LaRae M. Jome;Richard F. Haase;Monroe A. Bruch

  • Social Phobia and Difficulties in Occupational Adjustment.

    Monroe A. Bruch;Melissa Fallon;Richard G. Heimberg

  • Focus of attention and social anxiety: The role of negative self-thoughts and perceived positive attributes of the other.

    E. Mark Mahone;Monroe A. Bruch;Richard G. Heimberg

  • Type of self-discrepancy and relationships to components of the tripartite model of emotional distress

    Monroe A. Bruch;Kathy M. Rivet;Helene J. Laurenti

  • Cognitive specificity in social anxiety and depression: Supporting evidence and qualifications due to affective confounding

    Monroe A. Bruch;Jill I. Mattia;Richard G. Heimberg;Craig S. Holt

  • Differences between fearful and self-conscious shy subtypes in background and current adjustment

    Monroe A Bruch;Steve Giordano;Lesley Pearl

  • Evaluating the States of Mind Model: Comparison to an Alternative Model and Effects of Method of Cognitive Assessment

    Richard G. Heimberg;Monroe A. Bruch;Debra A. Hope;Mark Dombeck

  • Personality Factors and Inhibited Career Development: Testing the Unique Contribution of Shyness.

    Ronald J. Hamer;Monroe A. Bruch

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Heimberg
Richard G. Heimberg Temple University
Craig S. Holt
Craig S. Holt University of Iowa
Debra A. Hope
Debra A. Hope University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Franklin R. Schneier
Franklin R. Schneier Columbia University
Michael R. Liebowitz
Michael R. Liebowitz Columbia University
Marylene Cloitre
Marylene Cloitre New York University
Donald F. Klein
Donald F. Klein New York University
K. Rivet Amico
K. Rivet Amico University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brian A. Fallon
Brian A. Fallon Columbia University
Mark H. Thelen
Mark H. Thelen University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can lead to a variety of rewarding online career pathways. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a substance abuse counselor. The requirements to become a counselor can vary by location, making it important to understand the standards in different cities.

For example, the substance abuse counselor requirements in San Francisco include a mix of education and hands-on training, typically starting with a relevant bachelor’s or master’s degree. Similarly, San Jose substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize accredited coursework and state certification.

If you’re considering working in Southern California, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Santa Ana outline the need for supervised clinical hours and ongoing education. Meanwhile, the Scottsdale substance abuse counselors education requirements are similar, but may feature unique local regulations.

Exploring online degrees in psychology or counseling can help you meet these diverse requirements and launch a meaningful career in behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Monroe A. Bruch

Recently Published Articles