World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
6270
World Ranking
10415
National Ranking
5468

Mark H. Thelen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Thelen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark H. Thelen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Thelen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark H. Thelen was affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research contributions primarily spanned the field of Medicine, with particular involvement in multiple subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Thelen's work focused on a range of topics, notably in the domains of children's physical and motor development, muscle physiology and disorders, autism spectrum disorder research, inflammatory myopathies and dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis and related diseases, as well as peripheral neuropathies and disorders.

Thelen authored research papers published in recognized academic venues. These include:

  • Motor function testing rates and outcomes in Duchenne muscular dystrophy with comorbid autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 2025, Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Recruitment rate comparison between a virtual tele-research cohort and a traditional centre-based cohort in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, 2025, Lara D. Veeken

Throughout their career, Thelen frequently collaborated with other researchers. Among the noted coauthors were Joe Kelley, Eleni Tiniakou, Kenneth Crager, Jemima Albayda, and Dennis Keselman, all of whom contributed to Thelen's research output through multiple joint publications.

Publication venues that featured Thelen's work included Neuromuscular Disorders and Lara D. Veeken journals.

Best Publications

  • A revision of the bulimia test : the BULIT-R

    Mark H. Thelen;Janet Farmer;Stephen Wonderlich;Marcia Smith

  • Development and validation of a test for bulimia.

    Marcia C. Smith;Mark H. Thelen

  • Development and Validation of a Fear-of-Intimacy Scale

    Carol J. Descutner;Mark H. Thelen

  • Children's perceptions of peer influence on eating concerns

    Krista K. Oliver;Mark H. Thelen

  • The Bulimia Test--Revised: Validation with "DSM-IV" Criteria for Bulimia Nervosa.

    Mark H. Thelen;Laurie B. Mintz;Jillon S. Vander Wal

  • Children's expected interpersonal consequences of communicating their affective state and reported likelihood of expression.

    Dayna Fuchs;Mark H. Thelen

  • Distress and Professional Impairment Among Psychologists in Clinical Practice

    Michelle D. Sherman;Mark H. Thelen

  • Desire to be thinner and weight control among children and their parents

    Mark H. Thelen;Jane F. Cormier

  • Eating and body image concerns among obese and average-weight children.

    J S Vander Wal;M H Thelen

  • Predictors of body image dissatisfaction in elementary-age school girls.

    Jillon S Vander Wal;Mark H Thelen

  • The Fear-of-Intimacy Scale: Replication and extension.

    Susan C. Doi;Mark H. Thelen

  • Eating and Body Image Concern Among Children

    Mark H. Thelen;Anne L. Powell;Christine Lawrence;Mark E. Kuhnert

  • Body image, dieting, and self-concept: Their relation in African-American and Caucasian children

    Christine M. Lawrence;Mark H. Thelen

  • Therapeutic videotape and film modeling: a review.

    Mark H. Thelen;Richard A. Fry;Peter A. Fehrenbach;Nanette M. Frautschi

  • Parental factors related to bulimia nervosa.

    Addys Moreno;Mark H. Thelen

  • A Preliminary Prevention Program for Eating Disorders in a Junior High School Population.

    Addys B. Moreno;Mark H. Thelen

  • Fear of Intimacy among Dating Couples

    M. H. Thelen;J. S. Vander Wal;Amanda McCombs Thomas;R. Harmon

  • Knowledge and beliefs about confidentiality in psychotherapy

    David J. Miller;Mark H. Thelen

  • Overjustification and children's intrinsic motivation: Comparative effects of four rewards.

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Mark H. Thelen

  • Roles, functions, and training in clinical psychology: a survey of academic clinicians.

    Mark H. Thelen;Douglas R. Ewing

  • Emotions and cognitions associated with bingeing and weight control behavior in bulimia

    Anne L. Powell;Mark H. Thelen

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Dollinger
Stephen J. Dollinger Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Michael C. Roberts
Michael C. Roberts University of Kansas
Jillon S. Vander Wal
Jillon S. Vander Wal Saint Louis University
Michelle D. Sherman
Michelle D. Sherman University of Minnesota
Monroe A. Bruch
Monroe A. Bruch State University of New York
Laurie B. Mintz
Laurie B. Mintz University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of related online programs and professional pathways. Many students interested in mental health and behavioral sciences often consider degrees in social work or applied behavior analysis alongside traditional psychology programs.

For those drawn to social work, there are diverse online options available across the country. If you are located in the Southeast, you might explore the most valuable online social work degrees in Tennessee. Similarly, the most valuable online social work degree programs in Texas provide different focus areas and flexible learning formats.

Students interested in specialized roles, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), should be aware of specific state requirements. For example, you can learn more about Vermont bcba education requirements or steps for how to become a bcba in Virginia. These specialized credentials build on foundational psychology studies and can lead to rewarding, in-demand careers.

Exploring these related degrees and credentials allows you to align your educational path with your professional goals in the broad field of psychology and its allied disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Thelen

Recently Published Articles