World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5527
World Ranking
9514
National Ranking
5040

Stephen J. Dollinger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Dollinger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen J. Dollinger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Dollinger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. Dollinger is affiliated with Southern Illinois University Carbondale in the United States. Their academic work is recognized within this institution, contributing to the university's research environment.

While detailed records of publications, including recent papers, co-authors, and frequent publication venues, are not provided, Stephen J. Dollinger's engagement with academic production is indicated by the existing data structure.

No specific main fields or subfields of study are listed, which limits detailed identification of the scientist's research areas. Similarly, there is no available information on the main topics of work or specific areas of focus within their scholarship.

Information regarding awards or recognitions received by Stephen J. Dollinger is also not available. This absence means there is no documented data on formal honors related to their academic contributions.

There are no listed book publications or associated publishers connected to their name within the provided data.

Stephen J. Dollinger is currently listed as alive, which reflects an ongoing status as an academic researcher or professional affiliated with their institution.

Best Publications

  • Creativity and Openness: Further Validation of Two Creative Product Measures

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Klaus K. Urban;Troy A. James

  • Applying the big five personality factors to the impostor phenomenon.

    Naijean S Bernard;Stephen J Dollinger;Nerella V Ramaniah

  • Need for Uniqueness, Need for Cognition, and Creativity.

    Stephen J. Dollinger

  • Recognizing, Assessing, and Intervening With Problems of Professional Competence

    Nadine J. Kaslow;Nancy J. Rubin;Linda Forrest;Nancy S. Elman

  • Creativity and Values

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Philip A. Burke;Nathaniel W. Gump

  • Research Note: Personality and Music Preference: Extraversion and Excitement Seeking or Openness to Experience?:

    Stephen J. Dollinger

  • Reliability and Validity of Single-Item Self-Reports: With Special Relevance to College Students' Alcohol Use, Religiosity, Study, and Social Life

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Danielle Malmquist

  • Identity, Self, and Personality: I. Identity Status and the Five-Factor Model of Personality

    Stephanie M. Clancy;Stephen J. Dollinger

  • Which factors best account for academic success: Those which college students can control or those they cannot?

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Anna M. Matyja;Jamie L. Huber

  • On Traits and Values: With Special Reference to Openness to Experience

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Frederick T.L. Leong;Shawna K. Ulicni

  • Lightning-strike disaster: effects on children's fears and worries

    Stephen J. Dollinger;James P. O'Donnell;Arlinda A. Staley

  • Personality and performance in "personality": Conscientiousness and openness.

    Stephen J Dollinger;Lisa A Orf

  • Individualism‐collectivism in horizontal and vertical directions as predictors of conflict management styles

    Meera Komarraju;Stephen J. Dollinger;Jennifer L. Lovell

  • Creativity and conservatism

    Stephen J. Dollinger

  • Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness

    Stephanie M. Clancy;Stephen J. Dollinger

  • Identity and Creativity

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Stephanie M. Clancy Dollinger;Leslie Centeno

  • Cleaning up Data and Running Preliminary Analyses

    David L. DiLalla;Stephen J. Dollinger

  • The relationship between psychometric intelligence and the five-factor model of personality in a rehabilitation sample.

    Daniel C. Holland;Stephen J. Dollinger;Cornelius J. Holland;Douglas A. Macdonald

  • Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye.

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Stephanie M. Clancy

  • Overjustification and children's intrinsic motivation: Comparative effects of four rewards.

    Stephen J. Dollinger;Mark H. Thelen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark H. Thelen
Mark H. Thelen University of Missouri
Michael C. Roberts
Michael C. Roberts University of Kansas
Frederick T. L. Leong
Frederick T. L. Leong Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Nadine J. Kaslow
Nadine J. Kaslow Emory University
Phebe Cramer
Phebe Cramer Williams College
Beverly E. Thorn
Beverly E. Thorn University of Alabama
Steven K. Huprich
Steven K. Huprich Michigan State University
Laurie B. Mintz
Laurie B. Mintz University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of meaningful career paths, especially in counseling and behavioral health. One prominent field is substance abuse counseling, which is in high demand nationwide. While requirements vary by location, most positions require at least a bachelor’s degree in psychology, counseling, or a related field. Online programs make it easier than ever to earn these credentials while balancing other commitments.

Aspiring counselors should research specific state and city requirements. For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Tucson highlight the need for approved supervised experience and state certification. The process for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tulsa includes background checks and professional licensing. Meanwhile, those interested in the East Coast can explore Virginia Beach substance abuse counselor certification requirements to understand local variations. If you’re targeting the nation’s capital, read about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Washington DC for area-specific guidelines.

An online degree in psychology provides foundational knowledge for these roles and supports a variety of other career pathways, from social work to community outreach and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Dollinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles