World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
75
Citations
27471
World Ranking
5225
National Ranking
2483

David P. Siderovski publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Siderovski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David P. Siderovski D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Siderovski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Siderovski is affiliated with West Virginia University in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Within these broad disciplines, their publications focus on specific subfields such as Molecular Biology, Surgery, Physiology, Oncology, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Amoebic Infections and Treatments
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling

David P. Siderovski has published extensively, with a notable concentration in the venue UNC Libraries, where 63 of their works appear. Other venues with multiple publications include OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University, the Journal of Biological Chemistry, The FASEB Journal, and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Among recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • Regulator of G protein signaling 2 mediates cardiac compensation to pressure overload and antihypertrophic effects of PDE5 inhibition in mice, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Potential for Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonists to Engineer Nonaddictive Analgesics: A Narrative Review, 2020, Anesthesia & Analgesia
  • G-protein signaling: back to the future, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Regulation of T cell activation, anxiety, and male aggression by RGS2, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Receptor-selective Effects of Endogenous RGS3 and RGS5 to Regulate Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activation in Rat Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells, 2021, UNC Libraries

Coauthorship collaborations feature prominently in their research, with frequent collaborators including:

  • Francis S. Willard
  • Dustin E. Bosch
  • Adam J. Kimple
  • Christopher A. Johnston
  • Patrick M. Giguère

Best Publications

  • Molecular characterization of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor

    Santos A. Susin;Hans K. Lorenzo;Naoufal Zamzami;Isabel Marzo

  • Negative Regulation of PKB/Akt-Dependent Cell Survival by the Tumor Suppressor PTEN

    Vuk Stambolic;Vuk Stambolic;Akira Suzuki;Akira Suzuki;José Luis de la Pompa;José Luis de la Pompa

  • 5′-Capping enzymes are targeted to pre-mRNA by binding to the phosphorylated carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II

    Susan McCracken;Nova Fong;Emanuel Rosonina;Krassimir Yankulov

  • G-protein signaling: back to the future

    C. R. McCudden;M. D. Hains;R. J. Kimple;D. P. Siderovski

  • The GAPs, GEFs, and GDIs of heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits.

    David P. Siderovski;Francis S. Willard

  • Regulators of G-protein Signalling as New Central Nervous System Drug Targets

    Richard R. Neubig;David P. Siderovski

  • Regulator of G-protein signaling-2 mediates vascular smooth muscle relaxation and blood pressure

    K Mary Tang;Guang-rong Wang;Ping Lu;Richard H Karas

  • Tiam1 mediates Ras activation of Rac by a PI(3)K-independent mechanism

    John M. Lambert;Que T. Lambert;Gary W. Reuther;Angeliki Malliri

  • A Seven-Transmembrane RGS Protein That Modulates Plant Cell Proliferation

    Jin Gui Chen;Francis S. Willard;Jirong Huang;Jiansheng Liang

  • A G protein γ subunit-like domain shared between RGS11 and other RGS proteins specifies binding to Gβ5 subunits

    Bryan E. Snow;Andrejs M. Krumins;Sheu Fen Lee

  • Dynamic Regulation of RGS2 Suggests a Novel Mechanism in G-Protein Signaling and Neuronal Plasticity

    Tatsuya Ingi;Andrejs M. Krumins;Peter Chidiac

  • Translation of Polarity Cues into Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Caenorhabditis elegans Embryos.

    Kelly Colombo;Stephan W. Grill;Randall J. Kimple;Francis S. Willard

  • The Mitochondrial Proteins NLRX1 and TUFM Form a Complex that Regulates Type I Interferon and Autophagy

    Yu Lei;Haitao Wen;Yanbao Yu;Debra J. Taxman

  • Regulation of T cell activation, anxiety, and male aggression by RGS2.

    Antonio J. Oliveira-dos-Santos;Goichi Matsumoto;Bryan E. Snow;Donglin Bai

  • Structural and evolutionary division of phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains.

    Mark T. Uhlik;Brenda Temple;Sompop Bencharit;Adam J. Kimple

  • The telomerase reverse transcriptase is limiting and necessary for telomerase function in vivo

    Y Liu;B.E Snow;M.P Hande;D Yeung;D Yeung

  • A crystallographic view of interactions between Dbs and Cdc42: PH domain-assisted guanine nucleotide exchange.

    Kent L. Rossman;David K. Worthylake;Jason T. Snyder;David P. Siderovski

  • Structural determinants for GoLoco-induced inhibition of nucleotide release by Gα subunits

    Randall J. Kimple;Michelle E. Kimple;Laurie Betts;John E Sondek

  • Regulators of G-Protein Signaling and Their Gα Substrates: Promises and Challenges in Their Use as Drug Discovery Targets

    Adam J. Kimple;Dustin E. Bosch;Patrick M. Giguère;David P. Siderovski

  • A new family of regulators of G-protein-coupled receptors?

    David P. Siderovski;Andrew Hessel;Stephen Chung;Tak W. Mak

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis S. Willard
Francis S. Willard Eli Lilly (United States)
John Sondek
John Sondek University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
T. Kendall Harden
T. Kendall Harden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Josef M. Penninger
Josef M. Penninger University of British Columbia
Tak W. Mak
Tak W. Mak Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Channing J. Der
Channing J. Der University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tak W. Mak
Tak W. Mak Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Andrew Wakeham
Andrew Wakeham Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Mischa Machius
Mischa Machius The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Mark A. Giembycz
Mark A. Giembycz University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a diverse range of online degree programs and career opportunities in health sciences. Many students with a background in these fields pursue advanced or specialized online degrees to enter fast-growing healthcare professions.

For those interested in the intersection of healthcare and technology, a him degree online can prepare you for roles managing medical data and healthcare information systems. If you are passionate about nutrition and wellness, an online masters degree in nutrition can help you become a registered dietitian or health coach.

Advanced imaging roles are also in demand. Learning to perform diagnostic procedures through accredited sonography programs online or pursuing a career in medical imaging with radiology tech online programs can lead to rewarding positions in hospitals and clinics.

Online degrees in these areas offer flexibility, affordability, and access to high-demand careers, making them an excellent choice for students with a Biology or Biochemistry background.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Siderovski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles