World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
7347
World Ranking
16875
National Ranking
6954

Stephen M. Lanier publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Lanier sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 135 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stephen M. Lanier D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Lanier sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen M. Lanier is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology and Cell Biology as subfields. The main topics of their work include RNA Research and Splicing, Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling, Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Development and Cancer, Cancer-related Gene Regulation, Hippo Pathway Signaling and YAP/TAZ, Caveolin-1 and Cellular Processes, as well as Protein Structure and Dynamics.

The scientist has coauthored multiple papers with Ali Vural, reflecting a recurring collaboration in recent years.

Recent publications by Stephen M. Lanier include:

  • "Intersection of two key signal integrators in the cell: activator of G-protein signaling 3 and dishevelled-2," 2020, Journal of Cell Science
  • "Biomolecular Condensates defined by Receptor Independent Activator of G protein Signaling: Properties and Regulation," 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Biomolecular condensates defined by Activator of G protein Signaling 3 exhibit distinct properties and regulation," 2023, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • "Properties of biomolecular condensates defined by Activator of G-protein Signaling 3," 2024, Journal of Cell Science

The scientist's work has been published in several venues, notably:

  • Journal of Cell Science
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Best Publications

  • RECEPTOR-INDEPENDENT ACTIVATORS OF HETEROTRIMERIC G-PROTEIN SIGNALING PATHWAYS

    Aya Takesono;Mary J. Cismowski;Catalina Ribas;Michael Bernard

  • Asymmetrically Distributed C. elegans Homologs of AGS3/PINS Control Spindle Position in the Early Embryo

    Monica Gotta;Yan Dong;Yuri K. Peterson;Stephen M. Lanier

  • Genetic screens in yeast to identify mammalian nonreceptor modulators of G-protein signaling.

    Mary J. Cismowski;Aya Takesono;Chienling Ma;Jeffrey S. Lizano

  • Activator of G Protein Signaling 3: A Gatekeeper of Cocaine Sensitization and Drug Seeking

    M.Scott Bowers;Krista McFarland;Russell W Lake;Yuri K Peterson

  • ACCESSORY PROTEINS FOR G PROTEINS: Partners in Signaling

    Motohiko Sato;Joe B. Blumer;Violaine Simon;Stephen M. Lanier

  • Activation of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling by a ras-related protein. Implications for signal integration.

    Mary J. Cismowski;Chienling Ma;Catalina Ribas;Xiaobing Xie

  • Interaction of Arrestins with Intracellular Domains of Muscarinic and α2-Adrenergic Receptors

    Guangyu Wu;Jason G. Krupnick;Jeffrey L. Benovic;Stephen M. Lanier

  • Selective Interaction of AGS3 with G-proteins and the Influence of AGS3 on the Activation State of G-proteins

    Michael L. Bernard;Yuri K. Peterson;Peter Chung;Jane Jourdan

  • The elusive family of imidazoline binding sites

    Angelo Parini;Charilaos Gargalidis Moudanos;Nathalie Pizzinat;Stephen M. Lanier

  • Characterization of an imidazoline/guanidinium receptive site distinct from the alpha 2-adrenergic receptor.

    A Parini;I Coupry;R M Graham;I Uzielli

  • Stabilization of the GDP-bound conformation of Gialpha by a peptide derived from the G-protein regulatory motif of AGS3.

    Yuri K. Peterson;Michael L. Bernard;Hongzheng Ma;Starr Hazard

  • Mechanistic pathways and biological roles for receptor-independent activators of G-protein signaling.

    Joe B. Blumer;Alan V. Smrcka;Stephen M. Lanier;Stephen M. Lanier

  • Expression analysis and subcellular distribution of the two G-protein regulators AGS3 and LGN indicate distinct functionality. Localization of LGN to the midbody during cytokinesis.

    Joe B. Blumer;L. Judson Chandler;Stephen M. Lanier

  • The Ras-related protein AGS1/RASD1 suppresses cell growth

    Govindan Vaidyanathan;Mary J Cismowski;Guoshun Wang;Timothy S Vincent

  • Influence of the membrane lipid structure on signal processing via G protein-coupled receptors.

    Qing Yang;Regina Alemany;Jesús Casas;Klára Kitajka

  • AGS3 Inhibits GDP Dissociation from Gα Subunits of the Gi Family and Rhodopsin-dependent Activation of Transducin *

    Michael Natochin;Brad Lester;Yuri K. Peterson;Michael L. Bernard

  • AGS proteins: receptor-independent activators of G-protein signaling

    Joe B. Blumer;Mary J. Cismowski;Motohiko Sato;Stephen M. Lanier

  • Factors determining the specificity of signal transduction by guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors. III. Coupling of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes in a cell type-specific manner.

    E Duzic;S M Lanier

  • Factors Determining the Specificity of Signal Transduction by Guanine Nucleotide-binding Protein-coupled Receptors INTEGRATION OF STIMULATORY AND INHIBITORY INPUT TO THE EFFECTOR ADENYLYL CYCLASE

    Anne Marjamaki;Motohiko Sato;Rachel Bouet-Alard;Qing Yang

  • Identification of Gβγ binding sites in the third intracellular loop of the M3-muscarinic receptor and their role in receptor regulation

    Guangyu Wu;Galina S. Bogatkevich;Yurii V. Mukhin;Jeffrey L. Benovic

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan V. Smrcka
Alan V. Smrcka University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Angelo Parini
Angelo Parini Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
John L. Neumeyer
John L. Neumeyer Harvard University
William M. Chilian
William M. Chilian Northeast Ohio Medical University
Thomas L. Saunders
Thomas L. Saunders University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew B. Tobin
Andrew B. Tobin University of Glasgow
Michel Bouvier
Michel Bouvier University of Montreal
Peter W. Kalivas
Peter W. Kalivas Medical University of South Carolina
Isabelle Seif
Isabelle Seif University of Paris-Saclay
Julie Ahringer
Julie Ahringer University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to numerous related online degrees and dynamic career options. Many students explore health information fields, with opportunities such as medical coding offering flexibility and the potential for a strong medical.coding salary. As the healthcare industry evolves, you may wonder, is medical coding a dying career? The demand for skilled professionals in this sector remains robust, especially for those willing to keep up with new technologies and regulations.

Affordability is an essential factor for many students. You can find affordable online him programs if you’re interested in managing health data or records, adding another practical avenue to your academic journey. Likewise, those attracted to the intersection of nutrition and biology can pursue an online nutrition masters to deepen their expertise and job prospects.

Whether you seek a clinical, research, or health informatics pathway, these degrees and careers can complement your background in Biology or Biochemistry, offering flexibility, career stability, and meaningful impact in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Lanier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles