World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14141 13316 1307 1251 644 26668

Peter C. Hayes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter C. Hayes between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter C. Hayes published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2001. 12 of the 720 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2001. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 30 publications 2001: 36 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

720 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter C. Hayes: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 3
1986 1
1987 4
1988 5
1989 10
1990 8
1991 5
1992 9
1993 7
1994 17
1995 18
1996 16
1997 19
1998 21
1999 14
2000 30
2001 36
2002 22
2003 25
2004 18
2005 13
2006 22
2007 10
2008 26
2009 17
2010 22
2011 36
2012 26
2013 18
2014 20
2015 14
2016 20
2017 25
2018 20
2019 14
2020 21
2021 19
2022 29
2023 20
2024 18
2025 11
2026 1
Total 720
Download as CSV

Peter C. Hayes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 641–660 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 644 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371 644
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter C. Hayes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter C. Hayes is a researcher affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly contributions focus primarily on the field of Medicine, with an emphasis on Hepatology, Epidemiology, and Surgery, among other subfields.

Their recent work includes significant publications related to liver disease and related treatments. Notable papers include: Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis (2020, Gut), aMAP risk score predicts hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis (2020, Journal of Hepatology), Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension (2020, Gut), Carvedilol reduces the risk of decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated cirrhosis in a competing-risk meta-analysis (2022, Journal of Hepatology), and Randomised clinical trial: standard of care versus early-transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPSS) in patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal variceal bleeding (2020, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics).

The researcher has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ewan Forrest
  • Ramazan Idılman
  • Adrian J. Stanley
  • John Dillon
  • Patrick S. Kamath

They have published in multiple venues, predominantly in:

  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Gastroenterology

Research topics broadly cover areas related to liver health, including:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Among their academic outputs is a book titled German Railroads, Jewish Souls published in 2022 by Berghahn Books.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis.

    K P Moore;G P Aithal

  • Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes

    Robin Poole;Oliver J Kennedy;Paul Roderick;Jonathan A Fallowfield

  • UK guidelines on the management of variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic patients

    Dhiraj Tripathi;Adrian J Stanley;Peter C Hayes;David Patch

  • Analysis of factors predictive of mortality in alcoholic hepatitis and derivation and validation of the Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score

    E H Forrest;C D J Evans;S Stewart;M Phillips

  • Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hepatic Steatosis and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in People With Type 2 Diabetes: the Edinburgh Type 2 Diabetes Study

    Rachel M. Williamson;Jackie F. Price;Stephen Glancy;Elisa Perry

  • Moderate hypothermia for uncontrolled intracranial hypertension in acute liver failure.

    Rajiv Jalan;Steven Wmo Damink;Nicolaas Ep Deutz;Alistair Lee

  • Human cord blood-derived cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in the mouse liver with no evidence of cellular fusion

    Philip N Newsome;Ingolfur Johannessen;Shelagh Boyle;Evangelos Dalakas

  • Randomized controlled trial of carvedilol versus variceal band ligation for the prevention of the first variceal bleed.

    Dhiraj Tripathi;James W. Ferguson;Narendra Kochar;Joanna A. Leithead

  • aMAP risk score predicts hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis.

    Rong Fan;George Papatheodoridis;Jian Sun;Hamish Innes

  • Normal venous circulation of the gastroesophageal junction. A route to understanding varices.

    André Vianna;Peter C. Hayes;Gonzalo Moscoso;Marie Driver

  • Meta-analysis of value of propranolol in prevention of variceal haemorrhage

    P.C. Hayes;Iad. Bouchier;J.M. Davis;J.A. Lewis

  • Moderate hypothermia in patients with acute liver failure and uncontrolled intracranial hypertension

    Rajiv Jalan;Steven W.M. Olde Damink;Nicolaas E.P. Deutz;Peter C. Hayes

  • Hepatotoxicity of herbal remedies.

    F. B. MacGregor;V. E. Abernethy;S. Dahabra;I. Cobden

  • Interorgan ammonia and amino acid metabolism in metabolically stable patients with cirrhosis and a TIPSS

    Steven W. M. Olde Damink;Rajiv Jalan;Doris N. Redhead;Peter C. Hayes

  • Review article: omega‐3 fatty acids – a promising novel therapy for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

    G. S. Masterton;J. N. Plevris;P. C. Hayes

  • Controlled clinical trial of injection sclerotherapy for active variceal bleeding.

    David Westaby;Peter C. Hayes;Alexander E. S. Gimson;Rex J. Polson

  • National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Liver, Bladder, Cervical, and Gastric Cancers

    Catharine M. Sturgeon;Michael J. Duffy;Barry R. Hofmann;Rolf Lamerz

  • The role of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt(TIPSS) in the management of bleeding gastric varices: clinical and haemodynamic correlations

    D. Tripathi;G. Therapondos;E. Jackson;D.N. Redhead

  • Primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial comparing band ligation, propranolol, and isosorbide mononitrate.

    Hock F. Lui;Adrian J. Stanley;Ewan H. Forrest;Rajiv Jalan

  • A randomized, double-blind trial comparing pegylated interferon alfa-2b to interferon alfa-2b as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C

    Peter Hayes;John Plevris

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajiv Jalan
Rajiv Jalan University College London
Philip N. Newsome
Philip N. Newsome University of Birmingham
Ronan E. O'Carroll
Ronan E. O'Carroll University of Stirling
Nicolaas E. P. Deutz
Nicolaas E. P. Deutz Texas A&M University
David J. Harrison
David J. Harrison University of St Andrews
Roger Williams
Roger Williams Foundation for Liver Research
David J. Webb
David J. Webb University of Edinburgh
Jackie F. Price
Jackie F. Price University of Edinburgh
David E. Newby
David E. Newby University of Edinburgh
John Parkinson
John Parkinson University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying medicine in the USA, it’s important to consider alternative pathways that can also launch a rewarding healthcare career. Nursing is one of the fastest-growing fields and offers several flexible online degree options for aspiring professionals.

If affordability is your priority, you can find some of the cheapest phd nursing programs entirely online, making advanced study more accessible. For registered nurses seeking a bachelor’s degree, the rn to bsn online cost is another key factor, with many accredited programs offering budget-friendly options.

Non-nursing majors who want to pivot into the field may consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors, which allow a faster route to becoming a nurse with a master’s qualification. Additionally, several online bsn programs for non nurses are designed for those from different academic backgrounds and often have streamlined admission requirements.

Whether you’re aiming for clinical practice, research, or leadership roles, these online programs offer accessible and practical alternatives to a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Hayes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles