World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul Beardsley

Paul Beardsley

Award Badge
Computer Science
New Zealand
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5346 5194 13 11 141 10313

Paul Beardsley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Beardsley between 1990 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Beardsley published across 35 years, from 1990 to 2024, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2004. 4 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2004. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
1990 2024

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Beardsley: publications per year, 1990 to 2024
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 4
1993 0
1994 4
1995 3
1996 1
1997 2
1998 4
1999 4
2000 4
2001 6
2002 9
2003 13
2004 17
2005 13
2006 3
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 6
2011 5
2012 9
2013 7
2014 9
2015 4
2016 5
2017 6
2018 4
2019 5
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
2024 1
Total 160
Download as CSV

Paul Beardsley publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Beardsley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 132–141 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555 141
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Beardsley D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Beardsley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in New Zealand Leader Award

Overview

Paul Beardsley is affiliated with Weta Digital in New Zealand and has research contributions spanning multiple disciplines, including biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, computer science, and agricultural and biological sciences.

The main fields of study reflected in their research include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Computer Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

More specific subfields within their work consist of:

  • Genetics
  • Plant Science
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computational Mechanics

The principal topics addressed by Paul Beardsley involve:

  • Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Among the recent publications by Paul Beardsley are two papers both titled "Genomic mechanisms and consequences of diverse postzygotic barriers between monkeyflower species", published in 2023. One appeared in the journal Genetics and the other in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). These works have contributed to the understanding of genomic factors influencing reproductive barriers in plants.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul Beardsley include:

  • V. Alex Sotola
  • Colette S. Berg
  • Hongfei Chen
  • Samuel J. Mantel
  • Yao-Wu Yuan

Their frequent publication venues reflect a focus on genetics and preprint research platforms:

  • Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Design galleries: a general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation

    J. Marks;B. Andalman;P. A. Beardsley;W. Freeman

  • 3D Model Acquisition from Extended Image Sequences

    Paul A. Beardsley;Philip H. S. Torr;Andrew Zisserman

  • iLamps: geometrically aware and self-configuring projectors

    Ramesh Raskar;Jeroen van Baar;Paul Beardsley;Thomas Willwacher

  • High-quality single-shot capture of facial geometry

    Thabo Beeler;Bernd Bickel;Paul Beardsley;Bob Sumner

  • Sequential Updating of Projective and Affine Structure from Motion

    P. A. Beardsley;A. Zisserman;D. W. Murray

  • High-quality single-shot capture of facial geometry

    Unknown

  • Computer vision for interactive computer graphics

    W.T. Freeman;D.B. Anderson;P. Beardsley;C.N. Dodge

  • Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance for Multiple Non-Holonomic Robots

    Javier Alonso-Mora;Javier Alonso-Mora;Andreas Breitenmoser;Martin Rufli;Paul Beardsley

  • High-quality passive facial performance capture using anchor frames

    Thabo Beeler;Fabian Hahn;Derek Bradley;Bernd Bickel

  • Image-based 3D photography using opacity hulls

    Wojciech Matusik;Hanspeter Pfister;Addy Ngan;Paul Beardsley

  • RFIG lamps: interacting with a self-describing world via photosensing wireless tags and projectors

    Ramesh Raskar;Paul Beardsley;Jeroen van Baar;Yao Wang

  • Tangible interaction + graphical interpretation: a new approach to 3D modeling

    David Anderson;James L. Frankel;Joe Marks;Aseem Agarwala

  • A self-correcting projector

    R. Raskar;P. Beardsley

  • Navigation using Affine Structure from Motion

    Paul A. Beardsley;Andrew Zisserman;David W. Murray

  • Interaction using a handheld projector

    P. Beardsley;J. van Baar;R. Raskar;C. Forlines

  • Collision avoidance for aerial vehicles in multi-agent scenarios

    Javier Alonso-Mora;Tobias Naegeli;Roland Siegwart;Paul Beardsley

  • Metric calibration of a stereo rig

    A. Zisserman;P.A. Beardsley;I.D. Reid

  • Cooperative Collision Avoidance for Nonholonomic Robots

    Javier Alonso-Mora;Paul Beardsley;Roland Siegwart

  • Calibration of multiple cameras for a turntable-based 3D scanner

    Paul Beardsley

  • System and method for adding writing to photograph

    William T Freeman;Marx Joseph;Biazulay Paul;ウィリアム・ティー・フリーマン

  • High-quality single-shot capture of facial geometry: implementation details

    Thabo Beeler;Bernd Bickel;Paul Beardsley;Bob Sumner

Frequent Co-Authors

Javier Alonso-Mora
Javier Alonso-Mora Delft University of Technology
Clifton Forlines
Clifton Forlines Draper Labs
Markus Gross
Markus Gross ETH Zurich
Andrew Zisserman
Andrew Zisserman University of Oxford
Bernd Bickel
Bernd Bickel ETH Zurich
Hanspeter Pfister
Hanspeter Pfister Harvard University
Paul Henry Dietz
Paul Henry Dietz Misapplied Sciences, Inc.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens multiple pathways—whether you’re looking for an advanced degree, a fast-track program, or practical certifications. Many students and professionals start with 1 year associate degree programs online, which offer foundational knowledge and can quickly lead to entry-level tech roles. These programs are convenient for those who want a flexible, affordable way to begin a tech career.

For those wanting to specialize further without a long commitment, the shortest masters degree options enable professionals to upskill in as little as one year. If you’re considering a long-term investment, explore the most in demand masters degrees to align your education with employer needs in a rapidly evolving field.

Not everyone needs a full degree to advance. There are also easy certifications to get which boost your resume, provide key skills, and open doors to high-paying tech jobs. With so many online pathways, there’s an option for nearly every career goal in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Beardsley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles