World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8529 7963 501 490 82 7106

Baljinder K. Sahdra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Baljinder K. Sahdra between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Baljinder K. Sahdra published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2022. 26 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2022. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 13 publications
2003 2025

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Baljinder K. Sahdra: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 3
2011 4
2012 1
2013 4
2014 2
2015 7
2016 8
2017 6
2018 3
2019 9
2020 14
2021 7
2022 16
2023 9
2024 13
2025 13
Total 122
Download as CSV

Baljinder K. Sahdra publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baljinder K. Sahdra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 82
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Baljinder K. Sahdra D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baljinder K. Sahdra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Baljinder K. Sahdra is affiliated with the Australian Catholic University in Australia and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Education.

The scientist's research covers multiple topics, notably Mental Health Research, Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction.

Baljinder K. Sahdra has published extensively in prominent venues with frequent publications in the Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, Mindfulness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Co-authorship is a significant aspect of their research. Frequent collaborators include Joseph Ciarrochi, Steven C. Hayes, Philip D. Parker, Stefan G. Hofmann, and Herbert W. Marsh.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Evolving an idionomic approach to processes of change: Towards a unified personalized science of human improvement (2022), Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • A configural approach to aspirations: The social breadth of aspiration profiles predicts well-being over and above the intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations that comprise the profiles (2020), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Does school average achievement explain the effect of socioeconomic status on math and reading interest? A test of the Information Distortion Model (2020), Learning and Instruction
  • The roles of social-emotional skills in students' academic and life success: A multi-informant and multicohort perspective (2022), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Developing an item pool to assess processes of change in psychological interventions: The Process-Based Assessment Tool (PBAT) (2022), Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Best Publications

  • Intensive Meditation Training Improves Perceptual Discrimination and Sustained Attention

    Katherine A. MacLean;Emilio Ferrer;Stephen R. Aichele;David A. Bridwell

  • Intensive meditation training, immune cell telomerase activity, and psychological mediators

    Tonya L. Jacobs;Elissa S. Epel;Jue Lin;Elizabeth H. Blackburn

  • A Scale to Measure Nonattachment: A Buddhist Complement to Western Research on Attachment and Adaptive Functioning

    Baljinder Kaur Sahdra;Phillip R. Shaver;Kirk Warren Brown

  • Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the link between mindfulness and prosocial behaviour

    James N. Donald;Baljinder K. Sahdra;Brooke Van Zanden;Jasper J. Duineveld

  • Group Identification and Historical Memory

    Baljinder Sahdra;Michael Ross

  • Self-compassion protects against the negative effects of low self-esteem : a longitudinal study in a large adolescent sample

    Sarah Marshall;Phillip D Parker;Joseph Ciarrochi;Baljinder K Sahdra

  • Enhanced response inhibition during intensive meditation training predicts improvements in self-reported adaptive socioemotional functioning.

    Baljinder K. Sahdra;Katherine A. MacLean;Emilio Ferrer;Phillip R. Shaver

  • The development of compulsive internet use and mental health: A four-year study of adolescence.

    Joseph Ciarrochi;Phillip David Parker;Baljinder Kaur Sahdra;Sarah Louise Marshall

  • Contextual Positive Psychology: Policy Recommendations for Implementing Positive Psychology into Schools.

    Joseph Ciarrochi;Paul W. B. Atkins;Louise L. Hayes;Baljinder K. Sahdra

  • Empathy and nonattachment independently predict peer nominations of prosocial behavior of adolescents.

    Baljinder K. Sahdra;Joseph Ciarrochi;Philip D. Parker;Sarah Marshall

  • Nonattachment and mindfulness: Related but distinct constructs

    Baljinder Kaur Sahdra;Joseph Ciarrochi;Phillip David Parker

  • Intensive training induces longitudinal changes in meditation state-related EEG oscillatory activity

    Manish Saggar;Brandon G. King;Anthony P. Zanesco;Katherine A. MacLean

  • A longitudinal person-centered perspective on youth social support: Relations with psychological wellbeing.

    Joseph Ciarrochi;Alexandre J. S. Morin;Baljinder K. Sahdra;David Litalien

  • Hope, Friends, and Subjective Well-Being: A Social Network Approach to Peer Group Contextual Effects

    Philip D. Parker;Joseph Ciarrochi;Patrick C.L. Heaven;Sarah Marshall

  • Network analysis for the visualization and analysis of qualitative data

    Jennifer J. Pokorny;Alex Norman;Anthony P. Zanesco;Susan Bauer-Wu

  • Intensive meditation training influences emotional responses to suffering.

    Erika L. Rosenberg;Anthony P. Zanesco;Brandon G. King;Stephen R. Aichele

  • Self-reported mindfulness and cortisol during a Shamatha meditation retreat.

    Tonya L. Jacobs;Phillip R. Shaver;Elissa S. Epel;Anthony P. Zanesco

  • A configural approach to aspirations: The social breadth of aspiration profiles predicts well-being over and above the intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations that comprise the profiles

    Emma L. Bradshaw;Baljinder K. Sahdra;Joseph Ciarrochi;Philip D. Parker

  • Can security-enhancing interventions overcome psychological barriers to responsiveness in couple relationships?

    Mario Mikulincer;Phillip R. Shaver;Baljinder K. Sahdra;Naama Bar-On

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Ciarrochi
Joseph Ciarrochi Australian Catholic University
Philip D. Parker
Philip D. Parker Australian Catholic University
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Clifford D. Saron
Clifford D. Saron University of California, Davis
Emilio Ferrer
Emilio Ferrer University of California, Davis
Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Jiesi Guo
Jiesi Guo Australian Catholic University
Patrick C. L. Heaven
Patrick C. L. Heaven Australian Catholic University
George R. Mangun
George R. Mangun University of California, Davis
Elissa S. Epel
Elissa S. Epel University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, both clinical and non-clinical. Many students interested in psychology also explore related degrees, such as Speech-Language Pathology or therapy roles, which often require specialized certifications and training beyond an undergraduate degree.

For those considering a pathway as a speech therapist, each state has specific requirements. To learn about how to become a speech language pathologist in New Jersey or the steps for becoming a speech therapist in New Mexico, you’ll need to review respective guidelines around education, exams, and licensure.

Similarly, if you are interested in becoming a speech therapist in New York or want to know the North Carolina slp certification requirements, it's important to understand the credentialing process in each location.

Pursuing these related online degrees can help you advance your career and make a difference in the lives of others. Take time to explore the requirements and opportunities that align with your interests in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Baljinder K. Sahdra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles