World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6599
World Ranking
9760
National Ranking
561

Jiesi Guo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiesi Guo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jiesi Guo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiesi Guo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy. Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies

    Herbert W. Marsh;Reinhard Pekrun;Philip D. Parker;Kou Murayama

  • Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ming Te Wang;Jessica L. Degol;Jamie Amemiya;Alyssa Parr

  • Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective

    Jiesi Guo;Philip D. Parker;Herbert W. Marsh;Alexandre J. S. Morin

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Jiesi Guo;Theresa Dicke;Philip D. Parker

  • An integrated model of academic self-concept development: Academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over 6 years.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Reinhard Pekrun;Kou Murayama;A. Katrin Arens

  • What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Jiesi Guo;Philip D. Parker;Benjamin Nagengast

  • Building Grit: The Longitudinal Pathways between Mindset, Commitment, Grit, and Academic Outcomes

    Xin Tang;Ming-Te Wang;Jiesi Guo;Katariina Salmela-Aro

  • Expectancy-value in mathematics, gender and socioeconomic background as predictors of achievement and aspirations : A multi-cohort study

    Jiesi Guo;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Philip D. Parker;Alexandre J.S. Morin

  • Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) Using Set-ESEM: Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Sample of School Principals.

    Theresa Dicke;Herbert W. Marsh;Philip Riley;Philip D. Parker

  • Parental ethnic-racial socialization practices and the construction of children of color's ethnic-racial identity: A research synthesis and meta-analysis.

    James P. Huguley;Ming-Te Wang;Ariana C. Vasquez;Jiesi Guo

  • Parental ethnic-racial socialization practices and children of color's psychosocial and behavioral adjustment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ming-Te Wang;Daphne A. Henry;Leann V. Smith;James P. Huguley

  • Probing the Unique Contributions of Self-Concept, Task Values, and Their Interactions Using Multiple Value Facets and Multiple Academic Outcomes.

    Jiesi Guo;Benjamin Nagengast;Herbert Warren Marsh;Herbert Warren Marsh;Herbert Warren Marsh;Augustin Kelava

  • Extending expectancy-value theory predictions of achievement and aspirations in science: dimensional comparison processes and expectancy-by-value interactions

    Jiesi Guo;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Philip D. Parker;Alexandre J.S. Morin

  • Directionality of the Associations of High School Expectancy-Value, Aspirations, and Attainment A Longitudinal Study

    Jiesi Guo;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Alexandre J. S. Morin;Philip D. Parker

  • Mindfulness and Its Association With Varied Types of Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Self-Determination Theory:

    James N. Donald;Emma L. Bradshaw;Richard M. Ryan;Geetanjali Basarkod

  • Psychological Comparison Processes and Self‐Concept in Relation to Five Distinct Frame‐of‐Reference Effects: Pan‐Human Cross‐Cultural Generalizability over 68 Countries

    Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Philip D. Parker;Jiesi Guo;Reinhard Pekrun;Reinhard Pekrun;Reinhard Pekrun

  • Breaking the double-edged sword of effort/trying hard: Developmental equilibrium and longitudinal relations among effort, achievement, and academic self-concept.

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Reinhard Pekrun;Stephanie Lichtenfeld;Jiesi Guo

  • Job Satisfaction of Teachers and Their Principals in Relation to Climate and Student Achievement.

    Theresa Dicke;Herbert W. Marsh;Philip D. Parker;Jiesi Guo

  • The roles of social–emotional skills in students’ academic and life success: A multi-informant and multicohort perspective.

    Unknown

  • Effects of school-average achievement on individual self-concept and achievement: Unmasking phantom effects masquerading as true compositional effects

    Theresa Dicke;Herbert W. Marsh;Philip D. Parker;Reinhard Pekrun

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Philip D. Parker
Philip D. Parker Australian Catholic University
Reinhard Pekrun
Reinhard Pekrun Australian Catholic University
Ming-Te Wang
Ming-Te Wang University of Pittsburgh
Katariina Salmela-Aro
Katariina Salmela-Aro University of Helsinki
Baljinder K. Sahdra
Baljinder K. Sahdra Australian Catholic University
Alexandre J. S. Morin
Alexandre J. S. Morin Concordia University
Kou Murayama
Kou Murayama University of Reading
Rhonda Craven
Rhonda Craven Australian Catholic University
Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jiesi Guo