World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6669
World Ranking
8823
National Ranking
4694

Michael J. Coleman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Coleman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Coleman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Coleman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Coleman is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's body of work heavily emphasizes topics related to traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, with specific attention to advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications. Other notable research themes include schizophrenia research and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, and cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael J. Coleman include Martha E. Shenton, Sylvain Bouix, Yorghos Tripodis, Inga K. Koerte, and Michael L. Alosco. These collaborations reflect extensive joint efforts in areas intersecting neuroimaging and brain injury research.

Major publication venues for Coleman's work include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Schizophrenia
  • Journal of Neurotrauma

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael J. Coleman demonstrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Developing methods to detect and diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy during life: rationale, design, and methodology for the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project, 2021, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Cell type-specific manifestations of cortical thickness heterogeneity in schizophrenia, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Development of the PSYCHS: Positive Symptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS, 2023, Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Neuropsychological test performance of former American football players, 2023, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • White matter hyperintensities in former American football players, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia

Best Publications

  • Abnormalities of the left temporal lobe and thought disorder in schizophrenia. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Martha Elizabeth Shenton;Ron Kikinis;Ferenc A. Jolesz;Seth D. Pollak

  • Plasticity of face processing in infancy

    O. Pascalis;L. S. Scott;D. J. Kelly;R. W. Shannon

  • Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Anna Remington;John Swettenham;Ruth Campbell;Mike Coleman

  • An investigation of basic facial expression recognition in autism spectrum disorders

    Simon Wallace;Michael Coleman;Anthony Bailey

  • Age at first exposure to football is associated with altered corpus callosum white matter microstructure in former professional football players

    Julie M. Stamm;Julie M. Stamm;Inga K. Koerte;Inga K. Koerte;Marc Muehlmann;Marc Muehlmann;Ofer Pasternak;Ofer Pasternak

  • Scoring manual for the Thought Disorder Index.

    Mary Hollis Johnston;Philip S. Holzman;Margie R. Solovay;Martha E. Shenton

  • Does the perception of moving eyes trigger reflexive visual orienting in autism

    John Swettenham;Samantha Condie;Ruth Campbell;Elizabeth Milne

  • Face and emotion recognition deficits in Turner syndrome: a possible role for X-linked genes in amygdala development.

    Kate Lawrence;Joanna Kuntsi;Michael Coleman;Ruth Campbell

  • Inter-site and inter-scanner diffusion MRI data harmonization

    Hengameh Mirzaalian;Lipeng Ning;Peter Savadjiev;Ofer Pasternak

  • Development of motion processing in children with autism

    Dagmara Annaz;Dagmara Annaz;Anna Remington;Elizabeth Milne;Mike Coleman

  • A review of neuroimaging findings in repetitive brain trauma.

    Inga K. Koerte;Inga K. Koerte;Alexander P. Lin;Anna Willems;Anna Willems;Marc Muehlmann;Marc Muehlmann

  • Young children with autism spectrum disorder do not preferentially attend to biological motion.

    Dagmara Annaz;Ruth Campbell;Mike Coleman;Elizabeth Milne

  • Thought disorder in the relatives of psychotic patients.

    Martha E. Shenton;Margie R. Solovay;Philip S. Holzman;Michael Coleman

  • Correlations between abnormal auditory P300 topography and positive symptoms in schizophrenia: A preliminary report ☆

    Martha E. Shenton;Steven F. Faux;Robert W. McCarley;Ruth Ballinger

  • Interpreting gaze in Turner syndrome: impaired sensitivity to intention and emotion, but preservation of social cueing.

    Kate Lawrence;Ruth Campbell;John Swettenham;Janneke Terstegge

  • When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why?

    R. Campbell;M. Coleman;J. Walker;P. J. Benson

  • The Genetic Basis of Thought Disorder and Language and Communication Disturbances in Schizophrenia.

    Deborah L. Levy;Michael J. Coleman;Heejong Sung;Fei Ji

  • Cavum Septi Pellucidi in Symptomatic Former Professional Football Players

    Inga Katharina Koerte;Jakob Hufschmidt;Jakob Hufschmidt;Marc Muehlmann;Marc Muehlmann;Yorghos Tripodis

  • Speechreading and its association with reading among deaf, hearing and dyslexic individuals

    Tara Mohammed;Ruth Campbell;Mairéad Macsweeney;Fiona Barry

  • The classification of 'fear' from faces is associated with face recognition skill in women

    Ruth Campbell;Kate Elgar;Jonna Kuntsi;Rebecca Akers

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Ruth Campbell
Ruth Campbell University College London
Ofer Pasternak
Ofer Pasternak Brigham and Women's Hospital
Philip S. Holzman
Philip S. Holzman Harvard University
Sylvain Bouix
Sylvain Bouix Harvard Medical School
Olivier Pascalis
Olivier Pascalis Grenoble Alpes University
Thomas W. McAllister
Thomas W. McAllister Indiana University
Ross Zafonte
Ross Zafonte Harvard Medical School
Rajendra A. Morey
Rajendra A. Morey Duke University
Yogesh Rathi
Yogesh Rathi Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many students opt to focus on counseling, with substance abuse counseling being a particularly in-demand specialty. Becoming a counselor in this field often requires a mix of educational credentials and state-specific certifications.

For example, exploring substance abuse counselor requirements in Newark reveals the need for specific coursework, supervised experience, and licensure. Similarly, Norfolk substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the importance of accredited degrees and local certification processes.

If you’re considering working in the western U.S., be sure to look at the North Las Vegas substance abuse counselors education requirements as well as details on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Oakland. Each city and state has unique steps, degree requirements, and certification deadlines to follow.

Many U.S. universities now offer online psychology degrees tailored to these career paths, making it easier for students to meet educational requirements while gaining flexibility. Carefully researching local regulations will help ensure your chosen program aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Coleman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles