World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
48
Citations
6856
World Ranking
1224
National Ranking
69

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
6902
World Ranking
4688
National Ranking
143

Anita Schöbel publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita Schöbel sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 177 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Anita Schöbel D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita Schöbel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anita Schöbel is affiliated with the Technical University of Kaiserslautern in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a significant emphasis on industrial and manufacturing engineering, transportation, automotive engineering, modeling and simulation, and infectious diseases. The main topics of their work include transportation planning and optimization, vehicle routing optimization methods, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, transportation and mobility innovations, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, facility location and emergency management, and risk and portfolio optimization.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Anita Schöbel are:

  • "Periodic Timetabling with Integrated Routing: Toward Applicable Approaches," 2020, Transportation Science
  • "Case Numbers Beyond Contact Tracing Capacity Are Endangering the Containment of COVID-19," 2020, Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
  • "Estimating the robustness of public transport schedules using machine learning," 2022, Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • "The price of multiobjective robustness: Analyzing solution sets to uncertain multiobjective problems," 2020, European Journal of Operational Research
  • "Integrated optimization of sequential processes: General analysis and application to public transport," 2022, EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics

The frequent co-authors of Anita Schöbel include:

  • Philine Schiewe
  • Viola Priesemann
  • Reena Urban
  • Michael Meyer-Hermann
  • Iris Pigeot

The scientist often publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers & Operations Research
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Transportation Science

Best Publications

  • Line planning in public transportation: models and methods

    Anita Schöbel

  • Minmax Robustness for Multi-objective Optimization Problems

    Matthias Ehrgott;Matthias Ehrgott;Jonas Ide;Anita Schöbel

  • The Weber Problem

    Zvi Drezner;Kathrin Klamroth;Anita Schöbel;George O. Wesolowsky

  • Robustness for uncertain multi-objective optimization: a survey and analysis of different concepts

    Jonas Ide;Anita Schöbel

  • Computing delay resistant railway timetables

    Christian Liebchen;Michael Schachtebeck;Anita Schöbel;Sebastian Stiller

  • Delay Management with Rerouting of Passengers

    Twan Dollevoet;Dennis Huisman;Marie Schmidt;Anita Schöbel

  • An eigenmodel for iterative line planning, timetabling and vehicle scheduling in public transportation

    Anita Schöbel

  • A Model for the Delay Management Problem based on Mixed-Integer-Programming

    Anita Schöbel

  • To Wait or Not to Wait---And Who Goes First? Delay Management with Priority Decisions

    Michael Schachtebeck;Anita Schöbel

  • Integer programming approaches for solving the delay management problem

    Anita Schöbel

  • Hub Location Problems in Urban Traffic Networks

    Stefan Nickel;Anita Schöbel;Tim Sonneborn

  • Algorithm engineering in robust optimization

    Marc Goerigk;Anita Schöbel

  • Locating Lines and Hyperplanes: Theory and Algorithms

    Anita Schöbel

  • Optimization in Public Transportation: Stop Location, Delay Management and Tariff Zone Design in a Public Transportation Network

    Anita Schöbel

  • An approximation algorithm for convex multiplicative programming problems

    Lizhen Shao;Matthias Ehrgott

  • Integrating line planning, timetabling, and vehicle scheduling: a customer-oriented heuristic

    Mathias Michaelis;Anita Schöbel

  • Line Planning with Minimal Traveling Time

    Anita Schöbel;Susanne Scholl

  • Capacity constraints in delay management

    Anita Schöbel

  • Delay Management Including Capacities of Stations

    Twan Dollevoet;Dennis Huisman;Leo Kroon;Marie Schmidt

  • To Wait or Not to Wait? The Bicriteria Delay Management Problem in Public Transportation

    Andreas Ginkel;Anita Schöbel

  • Generalized light robustness and the trade-off between robustness and nominal quality

    Anita Schöbel

  • Algorithmic Methods for Railway Optimization

    Frank Geraets;Leo Kroon;Anita Schoebel;Dorothea Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Brimberg
Jack Brimberg Royal Military College of Canada
Horst W. Hamacher
Horst W. Hamacher Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Emilio Carrizosa
Emilio Carrizosa University of Seville
Leo Kroon
Leo Kroon Erasmus University Rotterdam
Kathrin Klamroth
Kathrin Klamroth University of Wuppertal
Dorothea Wagner
Dorothea Wagner Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Matthias Ehrgott
Matthias Ehrgott Lancaster University
Stefan Nickel
Stefan Nickel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Zvi Drezner
Zvi Drezner California State University, Fullerton
Peter Widmayer
Peter Widmayer ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, online degrees offer flexible and diverse career pathways. Many find that pursuing advanced studies in related fields, such as data analytics, can open doors to high-demand roles. Exploring the best masters in data analytics programs provides valuable insights into coursework and career outcomes for those leveraging mathematical skills in big data and business intelligence.

Business-oriented professionals with a mathematical background often consider online MBA degrees to complement their technical expertise. Choosing from mba programs that accept transfer credits can streamline the educational process, saving time and resources. Additionally, prospective students may wish to review the easiest mba and easiest mba program options available, helping them find accessible pathways that align with their career goals without compromising quality.

Understanding these related degrees enhances decision-making for Mathematics students seeking to expand their expertise and professional opportunities. Online education continues to break barriers, providing accessible options that cater to varying academic backgrounds and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Anita Schöbel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles