World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10369 9707 5440 4968 91 7779

Matt J. Gray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matt J. Gray between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matt J. Gray published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2007. 9 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2007. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matt J. Gray: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 5
2003 1
2004 6
2005 5
2006 4
2007 8
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 5
2012 6
2013 3
2014 4
2015 6
2016 1
2017 3
2018 2
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 3
2024 7
2025 2
Total 105
Download as CSV

Matt J. Gray publications per year - data summary

  • Matt J. Gray, a Psychology scholar from University of Wyoming, has 105 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 1999, 2003 and 2016, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 29 years in the span carries no publications at all (2000).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.8 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 18 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 27 publications (2.7 per year); 2007-2016: 46 publications (4.6 per year); 2017-2025: 32 publications (3.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Matt J. Gray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt J. Gray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 91
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matt J. Gray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Matt J. Gray, a Psychology scholar from University of Wyoming, records 91 publications - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Matt J. Gray, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Matt J. Gray ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Matt J. Gray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt J. Gray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Matt J. Gray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Matt J. Gray, a Psychology scholar from University of Wyoming, records 33 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Matt J. Gray, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Matt J. Gray ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Matt J. Gray is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their primary research fields include Psychology and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies as noted in their extensive publication record. The subfields also encompass Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Law.

Their work covers a variety of key topics related to trauma and mental health. These include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Matt J. Gray has contributed to multiple publication venues frequently, including:

  • Journal of Loss and Trauma
  • Violence Against Women
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Families Systems & Health
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Matt J. Gray are as follows:

  • Minority Stress Theory and Internalized Homophobia among LGB Sexual Assault Survivors: Implications for Posttraumatic Adjustment, 2020, Journal of Loss and Trauma
  • Universal screening and trauma informed care: Current concerns and future directions, 2021, Families Systems & Health
  • An Exploration of the Relationship Between Culture and Resilience Capacity in Trauma Survivors, 2020, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • A controlled trial of adaptive disclosure-enhanced to improve functioning and treat posttraumatic stress disorder, 2024, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Cultural Considerations in the Treatment of Latina Survivors of Sexual Assault, 2021, Journal of Loss and Trauma

The researcher collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Brett T. Litz, Ariel J. Lang, Joshua D. Clapp, Kendal Binion, and Stephanie Amaya, with multiple joint publications confirming ongoing partnerships in related trauma and clinical psychology research.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric properties of the life events checklist.

    Matt J. Gray;Brett T. Litz;Julie L. Hsu;Thomas W. Lombardo

  • Early intervention for trauma: Current status and future directions.

    Brett T. Litz;Matt J. Gray;Richard A. Bryant;Amy B. Adler

  • Which instruments are most commonly used to assess traumatic event exposure and posttraumatic effects?: A survey of traumatic stress professionals

    Jon D. Elhai;Matthew J. Gray;Todd B. Kashdan;C. Laurel Franklin

  • Coping style use predicts posttraumatic stress and complicated grief symptom severity among college students reporting a traumatic loss

    Kimberly R. Schnider;Jon D. Elhai;Matt J. Gray

  • Adaptive Disclosure: An Open Trial of a Novel Exposure-Based Intervention for Service Members With Combat-Related Psychological Stress Injuries

    Matt J. Gray;Yonit Schorr;William Nash;Leslie Lebowitz

  • Adaptive Disclosure: A New Treatment for Military Trauma, Loss, and Moral Injury

    Brett T. Litz;Leslie Lebowitz;Matt J. Gray;William P. Nash

  • Emotional numbing in posttraumatic stress disorder: current and future research directions.

    Brett T Litz;Matt J Gray

  • A Brief Exposure-Based Intervention for Service Members with PTSD.

    Maria M. Steenkamp;Brett T. Litz;Matt J. Gray;Leslie Lebowitz

  • A longitudinal analysis of PTSD symptom course: delayed-onset PTSD in Somalia peacekeepers.

    Matt J. Gray;Elisa E. Bolton;Brett T. Litz

  • Differences in posttraumatic stress disorder diagnostic rates and symptom severity between Criterion A1 and non-Criterion A1 stressors

    Mary E. Long;Jon D. Elhai;Amy Schweinle;Matt J. Gray

  • Trauma professionals' attitudes toward and utilization of evidence-based practices.

    Matt J. Gray;Jon D. Elhai;Lawrence O. Schmidt

  • Sexual Assault Programming on College Campuses: Using Social Psychological Belief and Behavior Change Principles to Improve Outcomes

    Lisa A. Paul;Matt J. Gray

  • Complexity of trauma narratives as an index of fragmented memory in PTSD: a critical analysis

    Unknown

  • Acute psychological impact of disaster and large-scale tauma: limitations of traditional interventions and future practice recommendations.

    Matt J. Gray;Shira Maguen;Brett T. Litz

  • Behavioral interventions for recent trauma: Empirically informed practice guidelines

    Matt J. Gray;Brett T. Litz

  • Psychopathology Following Interpersonal Violence: A Comparison of Risk Factors in Older and Younger Adults

    Ron Acierno;Kristine Brady;Matt Gray;Dean G. Kilpatrick

  • The Effectiveness and Feasibility of Videoconferencing Technology to Provide Evidence-Based Treatment to Rural Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Populations

    Christina Hassija;Matt J. Gray

  • Perceptions of Peer Rape Myth Acceptance and Disclosure in a Sample of College Sexual Assault Survivors

    Lisa A. Paul;Matt J. Gray;Jon D. Elhai;Joanne L. Davis

  • Relationship Closeness and Trauma Narrative Detail: A Critical Analysis of Betrayal Trauma Theory

    Katie M. Lindblom;Matt J. Gray

  • Rape and physical violence: comparison of assault characteristics in older and younger adults in the National Women's Study.

    Ron Acierno;Matt Gray;Connie Best;Heidi Resnick

  • Utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory’s Atypical Response Scale in Detecting Malingered Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder:

    Jon D. Elhai;Matthew J. Gray;James A. Naifeh;Jimmie J. Butcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Brett T. Litz
Brett T. Litz Boston University
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
B. Christopher Frueh
B. Christopher Frueh University of Hawaii at Hilo
Ron Acierno
Ron Acierno The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Connie L. Best
Connie L. Best Medical University of South Carolina
Shira Maguen
Shira Maguen University of California, San Francisco
Ariel J. Lang
Ariel J. Lang University of California, San Diego
Joanne L. Davis
Joanne L. Davis University of Tulsa
Dean G. Kilpatrick
Dean G. Kilpatrick Medical University of South Carolina
Samuel M. Y. Ho
Samuel M. Y. Ho City University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to many related online degrees and flexible career options. Social work is a particularly relevant path, blending the science of psychology with real-world impact in communities, schools, and healthcare. For those interested in working with diverse populations and making a difference, accredited online programs in social work provide a convenient way to earn credentials while balancing other responsibilities.

Many universities across the U.S. now offer high-quality, affordable options. For example, the best value online social work degrees in Indiana are ideal for students in the Midwest seeking reputable and cost-effective programs. Similarly, anyone evaluating most valuable online social work degree programs in Kansas or most valuable online social work degree programs in Maryland will appreciate the flexibility and career support offered by these institutions.

Particularly for those seeking value and strong career outcomes, the best value online social work programs in the Midwest can serve as a pathway to meaningful roles in counseling, mental health services, and more. Exploring these online degrees is a smart step for anyone interested in broadening their psychology career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Matt J. Gray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles