World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
89
Citations
32813
World Ranking
2526
National Ranking
1328

Helen Piwnica-Worms publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Piwnica-Worms sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 238 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Helen Piwnica-Worms D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Piwnica-Worms sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Helen Piwnica-Worms is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research broadly covers areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, focusing on molecular biology, oncology, cancer research, physiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their scholarly work addresses multiple aspects of cancer biology, including cancer cells and metastasis, cancer genomics and diagnostics, breast cancer treatment studies, cancer-related hypoxia and metabolism, RNA modifications in cancer, cancer-related molecular pathways, and ubiquitin and proteasome pathways.

Helen Piwnica-Worms has contributed frequently to a number of publication venues, especially cancer-focused journals and libraries. Notably, their publications have appeared in:

  • Cancer Research
  • Nature Communications
  • npj Breast Cancer
  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

A selection of recent papers by Helen Piwnica-Worms includes:

  • A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations (2020, Breast Cancer Research)
  • The RNA-binding protein AKAP8 suppresses tumor metastasis by antagonizing EMT-associated alternative splicing (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab inhibits triple-negative breast tumor growth by targeting GD2+ breast cancer stem-like cells (2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer)
  • Reprogramming of H3K9bhb at regulatory elements is a key feature of fasting in the small intestine (2021, Cell Reports)
  • Mammary-specific expression of Trim24 establishes a mouse model of human metaplastic breast cancer (2021, Nature Communications)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Helen Piwnica-Worms include:

  • Stacy L. Moulder
  • Jeffrey T. Chang
  • W. Fraser Symmans
  • Xiaomei Zhang
  • Stacy Moulder

Helen Piwnica-Worms has been recognized by several professional bodies for their contributions to science. They were inducted as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2013 and were named Fellows of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2007.

Best Publications

  • Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: Linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25

    Yolanda Sanchez;Calvin Wong;Calvin Wong;Richard S. Thoma;Richard S. Thoma;Ron Richman;Ron Richman

  • Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216.

    Cheng Yuan Peng;Paul R. Graves;Richard S. Thoma;Zhiqi Wu

  • ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1.

    Hui Zhao;Helen Piwnica-Worms

  • The product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene has properties of a cell cycle regulatory element.

    James A. DeCaprio;John W. Ludlow;Dennis Lynch;Yusuke Furukawa

  • Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition

    Matthew J. Ellis;Li Ding;Dong Shen;Jingqin Luo

  • Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase.

    Laura L. Parker;Helen Piwnica-Worms

  • Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases

    Zhou Songyang;Steven Blechner;Nicole Hoagland;Merl F. Hoekstra

  • The Chk1 protein kinase and the Cdc25C regulatory pathways are targets of the anticancer agent UCN-01

    Paul R. Graves;Lijia Yu;Julie K. Schwarz;Janis Gales

  • Abnormal Alzheimer-like phosphorylation of tau-protein by cyclin-dependent kinases cdk2 and cdk5

    K. Baumann;E. M. Mandelkow;J. Biernat;Helen Piwnica-Worms

  • Metformin Promotes Antitumor Immunity via Endoplasmic-Reticulum-Associated Degradation of PD-L1.

    Jong-Ho Cha;Wen-Hao Yang;Weiya Xia;Yongkun Wei

  • Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates the biochemical and biological properties of pp60c-src.

    Helen Piwnica-Worms;Kim B Saunders;Thomas M Roberts;Alan E Smith

  • Disruption of the checkpoint kinase 1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints.

    Hui Zhao;Janis L. Watkins;Helen Piwnica-Worms

  • Threonine 68 phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated is required for efficient activation of Chk2 in response to ionizing radiation

    Joon Young Ahn;Julie K. Schwarz;Helen Piwnica-Worms;Christine E. Canman

  • Kinetics of regulated protein–protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals

    Kathryn E. Luker;Matthew C. P. Smith;Gary D. Luker;Seth T. Gammon

  • The human Myt1 kinase preferentially phosphorylates Cdc2 on threonine 14 and localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex.

    Feng Liu;Jeffrey J. Stanton;Zhiqi Wu;Helen Piwnica-Worms

  • Replication checkpoint requires phosphorylation of the phosphatase Cdc25 by Cds1 or Chk1

    Yan Zeng;Kristi Chrispell Forbes;Zhiqi Wu;Sergio Moreno

  • Cyclin A/CDK2 binds directly to E2F-1 and inhibits the DNA-binding activity of E2F-1/DP-1 by phosphorylation.

    Min Xu;Kelly Ann Sheppard;Cheng Yuan Peng;Amy S. Yee

  • Lack of PTEN sequesters CHK1 and initiates genetic instability

    Janusz Puc;Megan Keniry;Hong Shen Li;Tej K. Pandita

  • Atypical PKC Phosphorylates PAR-1 Kinases to Regulate Localization and Activity

    Jonathan B Hurov;Janis L Watkins;Helen Piwnica-Worms

  • Contribution of p53 to Metastasis

    Emily Powell;David Piwnica-Worms;Helen Piwnica-Worms

Frequent Co-Authors

Alastair M. Thompson
Alastair M. Thompson Baylor College of Medicine
David Piwnica-Worms
David Piwnica-Worms The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jeffrey T. Chang
Jeffrey T. Chang The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Timothy P. Heffernan
Timothy P. Heffernan The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Banu Arun
Banu Arun The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Matthew J. Ellis
Matthew J. Ellis Baylor College of Medicine
Thomas M. Roberts
Thomas M. Roberts Harvard University
Lewis C. Cantley
Lewis C. Cantley Harvard University
Giulio Draetta
Giulio Draetta The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a variety of in-demand healthcare roles. Many students consider the job outlook for medical billing and coding, where professionals are needed to manage healthcare data and insurance information. This path offers flexible online study options and strong employment prospects.

Earning a health information management degree online can lead to careers managing electronic health records and ensuring data privacy in medical settings. These programs fit well for learners seeking a balance between science and technology.

For students focused on nutrition science, the cost of masters degree in nutrition is an important consideration. Many affordable online programs deliver advanced knowledge in dietetics and wellness without a heavy financial burden.

Additionally, online ultrasound tech programs train students for hands-on diagnostic imaging roles. These fields offer competitive salaries and stable job growth.

Online degrees make it possible to enter or advance in these healthcare pathways, combining flexibility, accessibility, and strong career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Helen Piwnica-Worms

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles