World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6548
World Ranking
9141
National Ranking
4848

Linas A. Bieliauskas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linas A. Bieliauskas sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Linas A. Bieliauskas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linas A. Bieliauskas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Linas A. Bieliauskas is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and related health professions, with notable work in clinical and social psychology as well as epidemiology and psychiatry and mental health.

Their scholarly output includes a focus on several key topics:

  • Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Occupational Therapy Practice and Research

Bieliauskas has contributed to the field primarily through publications in psychology and medicine, with a total of five publications in psychology and two each in medicine and health professions. Their work is also distributed across subfields such as social psychology, epidemiology, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and general psychology.

One publication of note from 2020 is titled Validating the usefulness of the NSI validity-10 with the MMPI-2-RF, published in the International Journal of Neuroscience. This article has received citations that reflect its contribution to neuroscience-related psychological assessment research.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Brian D. Gradwohl
  • Ryan W. Mangum
  • Kathryn A. Tolle
  • Percival H. Pangilinan
  • Robert J. Spencer

Research dissemination has been predominantly through the International Journal of Neuroscience, among other academic venues.

In recognition of their contributions to the field of psychology, they were named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1990.

Best Publications

  • Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: Additions to the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale that broaden its scope.

    Richard C. Mohs;David Knopman;Ronald C. Petersen;Steven H. Ferris

  • Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale that broaden its scope. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study.

    R C Mohs;D Knopman;R C Petersen;S H Ferris

  • Psychological depression and 17-year risk of death from cancer.

    Richard B Shekelle;William J. Raynor;Adrian M. Ostfeld;David C. Garron

  • Contemporary review 2009: cognitive aging.

    Lauren L. Drag;Linas A. Bieliauskas

  • Face emotion perception and executive functioning deficits in depression

    Scott A. Langenecker;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Lisa J. Rapport;Jon Kar Zubieta

  • Crashes and violations among drivers with Alzheimer disease.

    Jonathan D. Trobe;Patricia F. Waller;Carol A. Cook-Flannagan;Susan M. Teshima

  • Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies: Age- and IQ-Adjusted Norms for the Trail-Making Test, the Stroop Test, and MAE Controlled Oral Word Association Test.

    Brett A. Steinberg;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Self-reported cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury are poorly associated with neuropsychological performance in OIF/OEF veterans.

    Robert J. Spencer;Lauren L. Drag;Sara J. Walker;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Linas A. Bieliauskas

  • Derived Trail Making Test indices: A preliminary report.

    Greg J. Lamberty;S. Putnam;D. Chatel;L. Bieliauskas

  • WAIS-IV Reliable Digit Span is no More Accurate Than Age Corrected Scaled Score as an Indicator of Invalid Performance in a Veteran Sample Undergoing Evaluation for mTBI

    Robert J. Spencer;Bradley N. Axelrod;Lauren L. Drag;Brigid Waldron-Perrine

  • The contributions of self-reported injury characteristics and psychiatric symptoms to cognitive functioning in OEF/OIF veterans with mild traumatic brain injury.

    Lauren L. Drag;Robert J. Spencer;Sara J. Walker;Percival H. Pangilinan

  • Distinguishing between depression and dementia in the elderly: a review of neuropsychological findings.

    Greg J. Lamberty;Linas A. Bieliauskas

  • Cognitive function in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis enrolled in the HALT-C trial

    Robert J. Fontana;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Carla Back-Madruga;Karen L. Lindsay

  • Cognitive functioning, retirement status, and age: results from the Cognitive Changes and Retirement among Senior Surgeons study.

    Lauren L. Drag;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Scott A. Langenecker;Lazar J. Greenfield

  • Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies: Age- and IQ-Adjusted Norms for the Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Visual Spatial Learning Test

    Brett A. Steinberg;Linas A. Bieliauskas;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Cognitive Changes and Retirement among Senior Surgeons (CCRASS): Results from the CCRASS Study

    Linas A. Bieliauskas;Scott Langenecker;Christopher Graver;H. Jin Lee

  • Neuropsychological assessment of geriatric driving competence

    Linas A. Bieliauskas

  • Psychology in health care: Future directions.

    Brick Johnstone;Robert G. Frank;Cynthia Belar;Stephen Berk

  • The sensitivity and psychometric properties of a brief computer-based cognitive screening battery in a depression clinic.

    Scott Aaron Langenecker;Angela F. Caveney;Bruno Giordani;Elizabeth A. Young;Elizabeth A. Young

  • COGNITIVE MEASURES, DRIVING SAFETY, AND ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

    Linas A. Bieliauskas;Brad R. Roper;Jonathan Trobe;Paul Green

  • The social readjustment rating scale: Validity in a college population

    Linas A. Bieliauskas;James T. Webb

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott A. Langenecker
Scott A. Langenecker University of Utah
Jon Kar Zubieta
Jon Kar Zubieta University of Utah
Lisa J. Rapport
Lisa J. Rapport Wayne State University
Bruno Giordani
Bruno Giordani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert J. Fontana
Robert J. Fontana University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harold A. Kessler
Harold A. Kessler Rush University Medical Center
Robert C. Welsh
Robert C. Welsh University of Utah
Stanley Berent
Stanley Berent University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lazar J. Greenfield
Lazar J. Greenfield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anna S.F. Lok
Anna S.F. Lok University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, including becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Each state has unique requirements for aspiring LPCs, making it vital to understand regional regulations as you plan your career.

For example, those interested in working in Arkansas can start by reviewing the Arkansas licensed professional counselor requirements, which detail the necessary education, supervised practice, and exam criteria. If you are considering counseling in California, you should review the California lpc licensure requirements to understand the specific coursework, exams, and background checks involved.

Similarly, aspiring counselors in Colorado must be familiar with the Colorado lpc licensure requirements, while those in Connecticut will need to meet the Connecticut lpc licensure requirements. Exploring these licensure pathways will help you choose a suitable online psychology program and successfully transition into a rewarding counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Linas A. Bieliauskas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles