World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
8110
World Ranking
7212
National Ranking
158

Jean Dezert publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Dezert sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 319 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jean Dezert D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Dezert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean Dezert is affiliated with the Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales in France. Their research focuses on diverse areas within computer science and decision sciences, with a particular emphasis on artificial intelligence and operations research.

The primary fields of study that characterize Dezert's publications include:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

Within these broader domains, the main subfields explored are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Dezert's work addresses several key research topics, such as:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Throughout their career, Dezert has contributed to multiple publications. Some recent papers include:

  • "Multi-source information fusion: Progress and future" (2023), published in Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
  • "Combination of Classifiers With Different Frames of Discernment Based on Belief Functions" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • "Dezert-Smarandache Theory-Based Fusion for Human Activity Recognition in Body Sensor Networks" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • "Evidential Reasoning With Hesitant Fuzzy Belief Structures for Human Activity Recognition" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • "Evidential combination of augmented multi-source of information based on domain adaptation" (2020), published in Science China Information Sciences

Dezert frequently collaborates with a select group of coauthors, including:

  • Albena Tchamova
  • Xinde Li
  • Deqiang Han
  • Yilin Dong
  • Shuzhi Sam Ge

The venues where Dezert has been published most often reflect their research interests and include:

  • Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
  • IEEE Sensors Journal
  • Cybernetics and Information Technologies
  • IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Best Publications

  • Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion

    F. Smarandache;J. Dezert

  • Foundations for a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning

    Jean Dezert

  • Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion : Collected Works

    Florentin Smarandache;Jean Dezert

  • Combination of Classifiers With Optimal Weight Based on Evidential Reasoning

    Zhun-Ga Liu;Quan Pan;Jean Dezert;Arnaud Martin

  • Classifier Fusion With Contextual Reliability Evaluation

    Zhunga Liu;Quan Pan;Jean Dezert;Jun-Wei Han

  • Information fusion based on new proportional conflict redistribution rules

    F. Smarandache;J. Dezert

  • Evidence Combination Based on Credal Belief Redistribution for Pattern Classification

    Zhun-Ga Liu;Yu Liu;Jean Dezert;Fabio Cuzzolin

  • Adaptive imputation of missing values for incomplete pattern classification

    Zhun-ga Liu;Quan Pan;Jean Dezert;Arnaud Martin

  • A new belief-based K-nearest neighbor classification method

    Zhun-Ga Liu;Quan Pan;Jean Dezert

  • Applications and Advances of DSmT for Information Fusion

    Florentin Smarandache;Jean Dezert

  • Multi-source information fusion: Progress and future

    Unknown

  • Combination of sources of evidence with different discounting factors based on a new dissimilarity measure

    Zhun-ga Liu;Jean Dezert;Quan Pan;Grégoire Mercier

  • Evidence Combination From an Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective

    Xinyang Deng;Deqiang Han;Jean Dezert;Yong Deng

  • Credal c-means clustering method based on belief functions

    Zhun-ga Liu;Quan Pan;Jean Dezert;Grégoire Mercier

  • Fusion of sources of evidence with different importances and reliabilities

    F. Smarandache;J. Dezert;J.-M. Tacnet

  • Belief Interval-Based Distance Measures in the Theory of Belief Functions

    Deqiang Han;Jean Dezert;Yi Yang

  • On the validity of Dempster-Shafer Theory

    Jean Dezert;Pei Wang;Albena Tchamova

  • A new probabilistic transformation of belief mass assignment

    J. Dezert;F. Smarandache

  • On the behavior of Dempster's rule of combination and the foundations of Dempster-Shafer Theory

    Albena Tchamova;Jean Dezert

  • The SPOTIS Rank Reversal Free Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Support

    Jean Dezert;Albena Tchamova;Deqiang Han;Jean-Marc Tacnet

  • A New Incomplete Pattern Classification Method Based on Evidential Reasoning

    Zhun-Ga Liu;Quan Pan;Gregoire Mercier;Jean Dezert

  • Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rules for Information Fusion

    Florentin Smarandache;Jean Dezert

Frequent Co-Authors

Florentin Smarandache
Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico
Quan Pan
Quan Pan Northwestern Polytechnical University
Peter Reinartz
Peter Reinartz German Aerospace Center
Kathryn B. Laskey
Kathryn B. Laskey George Mason University
Erik Blasch
Erik Blasch United States Air Force Research Laboratory
Shuzhi Sam Ge
Shuzhi Sam Ge National University of Singapore
Audun Jøsang
Audun Jøsang University of Oslo
Xinyang Deng
Xinyang Deng Northwestern Polytechnical University
Yong Deng
Yong Deng University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens many doors, both academically and professionally. Today’s students have access to a wide range of online programs, making it easier to pursue higher education from anywhere. Those seeking cost-effective options should consider the affordable online masters programs available across the United States. These programs offer flexibility and significant savings on tuition.

For those interested in leadership roles, pursuing the best online doctorate in organizational leadership can lead to advanced positions in tech management and beyond. If you’re starting your educational journey, searching for community colleges near me can help you find accessible associate degrees, often providing a stepping stone into more specialized studies in computer science.

Considering an advanced degree? It’s important to understand how much does a doctorate in education cost before making a commitment. Exploring these pathways ensures you make informed decisions about your educational and career future.

Best Scientists Citing Jean Dezert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles