World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Andreas Bergmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Bergmann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andreas Bergmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Bergmann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Bergmann is a researcher affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in the United States. Their work spans several domains within contemporary biological sciences, focusing primarily on mechanisms related to cell biology, immunology, and molecular biology.

Their research portfolio includes investigations into cell death mechanisms and regulation, invertebrate immune response mechanisms, and signaling pathways such as the Hippo pathway and YAP/TAZ. Further topics of focus include neurobiology and insect physiology research, phagocytosis and immune regulation, entomological studies and ecology, as well as insect behavior and control techniques.

Key frequent co-authors collaborating with Andreas Bergmann include Alla Amcheslavsky, Alicia Shields, Jillian L. Lindblad, Yun Fan, and Elizabeth Brown.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publications in well-regarded venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Cell Reports
  • Nature Communications
  • PLoS Genetics

Their recent publications reflect engagements with cellular stress responses, apoptosis, and immune signaling. Notable papers include:

  • "Basement membrane damage by ROS- and JNK-mediated Mmp2 activation drives macrophage recruitment to overgrown tissue," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Transiently 'Undead' Enterocytes Mediate Homeostatic Tissue Turnover in the Adult Drosophila Midgut," 2020, Cell Reports
  • "Toll-9 interacts with Toll-1 to mediate a feedback loop during apoptosis-induced proliferation in Drosophila," 2022, Cell Reports
  • "Actin remodeling mediates ROS production and JNK activation to drive apoptosis-induced proliferation," 2022, PLoS Genetics
  • "Non-apoptotic enteroblast-specific role of the initiator caspase Dronc for development and homeostasis of the Drosophila intestine," 2021, Scientific Reports

Their expertise lies predominantly in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, along with Immunology and Microbiology. These are supported by extensive work in subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Insect Science.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Assay for the Measurement of Copeptin, a Stable Peptide Derived from the Precursor of Vasopressin

    Nils G. Morgenthaler;Joachim Struck;Christine Alonso;Andreas Bergmann

  • Novel and Conventional Biomarkers for Prediction of Incident Cardiovascular Events in the Community

    Olle Melander;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Peter Almgren;Bo Hedblad

  • Mid-region pro-hormone markers for diagnosis and prognosis in acute dyspnea : results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial

    Alan Maisel;Christian Mueller;Richard Nowak;W. Frank Peacock

  • Incremental Value of Copeptin for Rapid Rule Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Tobias Reichlin;Willibald Hochholzer;Claudia Stelzig;Kirsten Laule

  • The Drosophila Gene hid Is a Direct Molecular Target of Ras-Dependent Survival Signaling

    Andreas Bergmann;Julie Agapite;Kimberly McCall;Hermann Steller

  • Association of common variants in NPPA and NPPB with circulating natriuretic peptides and blood pressure

    Christopher Newton-Cheh;Martin G Larson;Ramachandran S Vasan;Daniel Levy

  • Measurement of Midregional Proadrenomedullin in Plasma with an Immunoluminometric Assay

    Nils G. Morgenthaler;Joachim Struck;Christine Alonso;Andreas Bergmann

  • C-Terminal Provasopressin (Copeptin) as a Novel and Prognostic Marker in Acute Myocardial Infarction Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide (LAMP) Study

    Sohail Q. Khan;Onkar S. Dhillon;Russell J. O’Brien;Joachim Struck

  • Immunoluminometric Assay for the Midregion of Pro-Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Human Plasma

    Nils G. Morgenthaler;Joachim Struck;Barbara Thomas;Andreas Bergmann

  • Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin as a prognostic marker in sepsis: an observational study

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Nils G Morgenthaler;Joachim Struck;Stephan Harbarth

  • Copeptin improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

    Till Keller;Stergios Tzikas;Tanja Zeller;Ewa Czyz

  • Second Generation Assay for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies Has Superior Diagnostic Sensitivity for Graves’ Disease

    Sabine Costagliola;Nils G. Morgenthaler;Rudolf Hoermann;Klaus Badenhoop

  • Apoptosis, Stem Cells, and Tissue Regeneration

    Andreas Bergmann;Hermann Steller

  • Plasma copeptin and the risk of diabetes mellitus

    Sofia Enhörning;Thomas J. Wang;Peter M. Nilsson;Peter Almgren

  • Pro-adrenomedullin to predict severity and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia [ISRCTN04176397]

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Nils G Morgenthaler;Daiana Stolz;Christian Müller

  • Apoptosis-induced compensatory proliferation. The Cell is dead. Long live the Cell!

    Yun Fan;Andreas Bergmann

  • Assessment of conventional cardiovascular risk factors and multiple biomarkers for the prediction of incident heart failure and atrial fibrillation.

    J. Gustav Smith;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Peter Almgren;Joachim Struck

  • Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the vasopressin precursor, is elevated in serum of sepsis patients.

    Joachim Struck;Nils G. Morgenthaler;Andreas Bergmann

  • Comparison of Copeptin, B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, and Amino-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Prediction of Death at Different Stages of the Disease

    Stephanie Neuhold;Martin Huelsmann;Guido Strunk;Brigitte Stoiser

Frequent Co-Authors

Nils G. Morgenthaler
Nils G. Morgenthaler Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Leong L. Ng
Leong L. Ng University of Leicester
Christian Mueller
Christian Mueller University Hospital of Basel
Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Mirjam Christ-Crain
Mirjam Christ-Crain University of Basel
Hermann Steller
Hermann Steller Rockefeller University
Alan S. Maisel
Alan S. Maisel University of California, San Diego
Piotr Ponikowski
Piotr Ponikowski Wrocław Medical University
Peter Pickkers
Peter Pickkers Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options is an excellent way to jumpstart your medical career in the USA. Many students seek online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, which can save time and fit busy lifestyles. These programs are perfect for working professionals or those seeking more flexibility.

For nursing professionals aiming for leadership roles, pursuing a fastest dnp online program is a strategic choice. Some institutions even offer a 1 year dnp program online, allowing you to accelerate your education and career advancement.

Those looking to enter the nursing field quickly often ask, what is the fastest way to become an lpn? Fast-track LPN programs online provide a rapid pathway to begin working as a licensed practical nurse, often in less than a year.

With so many online study options, it’s essential to research accreditation, state licensure requirements, and program flexibility to ensure you choose the pathway that best fits your career ambitions in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Bergmann

Trending Scientists