World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 45 2875 2611 16 16 114 6590

Reshma Taneja publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reshma Taneja between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reshma Taneja published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2023. 14 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2023. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
1992 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reshma Taneja: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 3
2010 1
2011 0
2012 5
2013 4
2014 7
2015 1
2016 7
2017 5
2018 4
2019 15
2020 8
2021 11
2022 11
2023 17
2024 7
2025 7
Total 148
Download as CSV

Reshma Taneja publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reshma Taneja sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–116 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 114 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162 114
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Reshma Taneja D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reshma Taneja sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 45
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Reshma Taneja is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research predominantly covers the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these, significant focus is placed on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Cancer Research, Epidemiology, and Oncology.

Their main topics of investigation include:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Taneja has contributed to numerous publications, and some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • PFKP alleviates glucose starvation-induced metabolic stress in lung cancer cells via AMPK-ACC2 dependent fatty acid oxidation, 2022, Cell Discovery
  • EHMT1/EHMT2 in EMT, cancer stemness and drug resistance: emerging evidence and mechanisms, 2021, FEBS Journal
  • Crosstalk Between Inflammatory Signaling and Methylation in Cancer, 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • BHLHE40 Regulates the T-Cell Effector Function Required for Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling and Immune Checkpoint Therapy Efficacy, 2022, Cancer Immunology Research
  • BHLHE40 Promotes TH2 Cell-Mediated Antihelminth Immunity and Reveals Cooperative CSF2RB Family Cytokines, 2020, The Journal of Immunology

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancers
  • Cancer Research
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Collaborations have been an important part of Taneja's career, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Jia Yu Leung
  • Brian T. Edelson
  • Dipanwita Das
  • Amos Hong Pheng Loh
  • P. G. Pande

Best Publications

  • Overexpression of Stra13, a novel retinoic acid-inducible gene of the basic helix–loop–helix family, inhibits mesodermal and promotes neuronal differentiation of P19 cells

    Mohamed Boudjelal;Reshma Taneja;Shyuichiro Matsubara;Philippe Bouillet

  • Synergistic activation of retinoic acid (RA)-responsive genes and induction of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation by an RA receptor alpha (RAR alpha)-, RAR beta-, or RAR gamma-selective ligand in combination with a retinoid X receptor-specific ligand.

    B Roy;R Taneja;P Chambon

  • Foxo3 is essential for the regulation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated and oxidative stress-mediated homeostasis of hematopoietic stem cells.

    Safak Yalcin;Xin Zhang;Julia P. Luciano;Sathish Kumar Mungamuri

  • Stra13 expression is associated with growth arrest and represses transcription through histone deacetylase (HDAC)-dependent and HDAC-independent mechanisms

    Hong Sun;Reshma Taneja

  • Targeted disruption of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR alpha) and RAR gamma results in receptor-specific alterations in retinoic acid-mediated differentiation and retinoic acid metabolism.

    J F Boylan;T Lufkin;C C Achkar;R Taneja

  • Defective T cell activation and autoimmune disorder in Stra13-deficient mice

    Hong Sun;Binfeng Lu;Rong-Qin Li;Richard A. Flavell

  • The Transcription Factor Bhlhe40 Programs Mitochondrial Regulation of Resident CD8+ T Cell Fitness and Functionality

    Chaofan Li;Bibo Zhu;Young Min Son;Zheng Wang

  • Oxidative stress regulation of stem and progenitor cells.

    Shazib Pervaiz;Reshma Taneja;Saghi Ghaffari

  • G9a, a multipotent regulator of gene expression.

    Shilpa Rani Shankar;Avinash G. Bahirvani;Vinay Kumar Rao;Narendra Bharathy

  • Lysine methyltransferase G9a methylates the transcription factor MyoD and regulates skeletal muscle differentiation

    Belinda Mei Tze Ling;Narendra Bharathy;Teng-Kai Chung;Wai Kay Kok

  • Loss of retinoic acid receptor gamma function in F9 cells by gene disruption results in aberrant Hoxa-1 expression and differentiation upon retinoic acid treatment.

    John F. Boylan;David Lohnes;Reshma Taneja;Pierre Chambon

  • Cell-type and promoter-context dependent retinoic acid receptor (RAR) redundancies for RAR beta 2 and Hoxa-1 activation in F9 and P19 cells can be artefactually generated by gene knockouts

    Reshma Taneja;Bidyut Roy;Jean-Luc Plassat;Chris F. Zusi

  • A unique role for p53 in the regulation of M2 macrophage polarization

    L Li;D S W Ng;W-C Mah;F F Almeida

  • Phosphorylation of activation functions AF‐1 and AF‐2 of RARα and RARγ is indispensable for differentiation of F9 cells upon retinoic acid and cAMP treatment

    Reshma Taneja;Cécile Rochette‐Egly;Jean‐Luc Plassat;Lucia Penna

  • Reexpression of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) gamma or overexpression of RAR alpha or RAR beta in RAR gamma-null F9 cells reveals a partial functional redundancy between the three RAR types

    Reshma Taneja;Philippe Bouillet;John F. Boylan;Marie-Pierre Gaub

  • Disturbed clockwork resetting in Sharp-1 and Sharp-2 single and double mutant mice.

    Moritz J. Rossner;Henrik Oster;Sven P. Wichert;Lisa Reinecke

  • Essential role for the transcription factor Bhlhe41 in regulating the development, self-renewal and BCR repertoire of B-1a cells

    Taras Kreslavsky;Bojan Vilagos;Hiromi Tagoh;Daniela Kostanova Poliakova

  • The Transcriptional Repressor STRA13 Regulates a Subset of Peripheral Circadian Outputs

    Aline Gréchez-Cassiau;Satchidananda Panda;Satchidananda Panda;Samuel Lacoche;Michèle Teboul

  • The expression pattern of the mouse receptor tyrosine kinase gene MDK1 is conserved through evolution and requires Hoxa-2 for rhombomere-specific expression in mouse embryos.

    Reshma Taneja;Bernard Thisse;Filippo M. Rijli;Christine Thisse

  • Erratum: The Transcription Factor Bhlhe40 Programs Mitochondrial Regulation of Resident CD8+ T Cell Fitness and Functionality (Immunity (2019) 51(3) (491–507.e7), (S1074761319303644), (10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.013))

    Chaofan Li;Bibo Zhu;Young Min Son;Zheng Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Chambon
Pierre Chambon Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Tapas K. Kundu
Tapas K. Kundu Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research
Ernesto Guccione
Ernesto Guccione Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Haidong Dong
Haidong Dong Mayo Clinic
Joseph F. Urban
Joseph F. Urban United States Department of Agriculture
Meinrad Busslinger
Meinrad Busslinger Research Institute of Molecular Pathology
Jeffrey C. Rathmell
Jeffrey C. Rathmell Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck
Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck Washington University in St. Louis
Mark H. Kaplan
Mark H. Kaplan Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore Molecular Biology, it's valuable to consider related online degrees and career options. Students interested in biological sciences often look into diverse fields that intersect with healthcare, research, and education.

For example, history and science often overlap in areas like public health, bioethics, and scientific communication. Accessing the best online master's in history programs can offer perspective on the evolution of science and research methods.

For those interested in organizing scientific data and literature, a Master’s in Library Science is highly relevant. Understanding the cost of mlis degree us will help you evaluate if this pathway fits your goals and budget.

Another promising direction is speech-language pathology, especially if you are drawn to health sciences. There are a number of accredited speech pathology programs available online, offering flexibility and industry-approved training.

If your background is not in speech or communication sciences, you can bridge the gap through online bridge programs non-SLP majors. These programs make it easier for students from molecular biology and related fields to transition into new, rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Reshma Taneja

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles