World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
88
Citations
38538
World Ranking
2645
National Ranking
1375

Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 248 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Immunology and Microbiology.

Their subfields of study include Immunology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Epidemiology. The main topics covered in their work involve Gut microbiota and health, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research, Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics, Immune Cell Function and Interaction, and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology.

Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck has contributed significantly to scholarly journals, frequently publishing in Gastroenterology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Journal of Immunology, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, and Science.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Debaryomyces is enriched in Crohn's disease intestinal tissue and impairs healing in mice, 2021, Science
  • The Intestinal Microbiome Restricts Alphavirus Infection and Dissemination through a Bile Acid-Type I IFN Signaling Axis, 2020, Cell
  • A network medicine approach to investigation and population-based validation of disease manifestations and drug repurposing for COVID-19, 2020, PLoS Biology
  • Western diet induces Paneth cell defects through microbiome alterations and farnesoid X receptor and type I interferon activation, 2021, Cell Host & Microbe
  • Organoids in gastrointestinal diseases: from experimental models to clinical translation, 2022, Gut

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stappenbeck include Ta-Chiang Liu, Dermot McGovern, Kelli L. VanDussen, Talin Haritunians, and Qiuhe Lu.

Best Publications

  • Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases.

    Jason Lloyd-Price;Jason Lloyd-Price;Cesar Arze;Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan;Melanie Schirmer;Melanie Schirmer

  • A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility

    Mahesh S. Desai;Mahesh S. Desai;Anna M. Seekatz;Nicole M. Koropatkin;Nobuhiko Kamada

  • A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal Paneth cells

    Ken Cadwell;John Y. Liu;Sarah L. Brown;Hiroyuki Miyoshi

  • Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells.

    Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck;Lora V. Hooper;Jeffrey I. Gordon

  • Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease.

    Jason M. Norman;Scott A. Handley;Megan T. Baldridge;Lindsay Droit

  • Angiogenins: a new class of microbicidal proteins involved in innate immunity

    Lora V. Hooper;Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck;Chieu V. Hong;Jeffrey I. Gordon

  • Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota

    Stephanie K. Lathrop;Seth M. Bloom;Sindhuja M. Rao;Katherine Nutsch

  • Virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn's disease gene Atg16L1 phenotypes in intestine

    Ken Cadwell;Khushbu K. Patel;Nicole S. Maloney;Ta Chiang Liu

  • Peripheral CD103+ dendritic cells form a unified subset developmentally related to CD8α+ conventional dendritic cells

    Brian T. Edelson;Wumesh Kc;Richard Juang;Masako Kohyama

  • Activated macrophages are an adaptive element of the colonic epithelial progenitor niche necessary for regenerative responses to injury.

    Sarah L. Pull;Jason M. Doherty;Jason C. Mills;Jeffrey I. Gordon

  • In vitro expansion and genetic modification of gastrointestinal stem cells in spheroid culture

    Hiroyuki Miyoshi;Thaddeus S Stappenbeck

  • The Colonic Crypt Protects Stem Cells from Microbiota-Derived Metabolites

    Gerard E. Kaiko;Stacy H. Ryu;Olivia I. Koues;Patrick L. Collins

  • Gremlin 1 identifies a skeletal stem cell with bone, cartilage, and reticular stromal potential.

    Daniel L. Worthley;Michael Churchill;Jocelyn T. Compton;Yagnesh Tailor

  • Commensal Bacteroides Species Induce Colitis in Host-Genotype-Specific Fashion in a Mouse Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Seth M. Bloom;Vinieth N. Bijanki;Gerardo M. Nava;Lulu Sun

  • Development of an enhanced human gastrointestinal epithelial culture system to facilitate patient-based assays

    Kelli L VanDussen;Jeffrey M Marinshaw;Nurmohammad Shaikh;Hiroyuki Miyoshi

  • The microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine protects from influenza through type I interferon

    Ashley L. Steed;George P. Christophi;Gerard E. Kaiko;Lulu Sun

  • Notch2-dependent classical dendritic cells orchestrate intestinal immunity to attaching-and-effacing bacterial pathogens

    Ansuman T. Satpathy;Carlos G. Briseño;Jacob S. Lee;Dennis Ng

  • Wnt5a Potentiates TGF-β Signaling to Promote Colonic Crypt Regeneration After Tissue Injury

    Hiroyuki Miyoshi;Rieko Ajima;Christine Tzy-Yuh Luo;Terry P. Yamaguchi

  • The Role of Stromal Stem Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Wound Repair

    Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck;Hiroyuki Miyoshi

  • Genetics and Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

    Ta-Chiang Liu;Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramnik J. Xavier
Ramnik J. Xavier Broad Institute
Jeffrey I. Gordon
Jeffrey I. Gordon Washington University in St. Louis
Dermot P.B. McGovern
Dermot P.B. McGovern Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Talin Haritunians
Talin Haritunians Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Jason C. Mills
Jason C. Mills Baylor College of Medicine
Lora V. Hooper
Lora V. Hooper The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael J. Holtzman
Michael J. Holtzman Washington University in St. Louis
L. David Sibley
L. David Sibley Washington University in St. Louis
Helen Piwnica-Worms
Helen Piwnica-Worms The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA, it’s valuable to consider related online degrees and diverse career options. Today’s flexible online learning environments make it easier than ever to broaden your expertise or shift toward interdisciplinary fields.

For students interested in health science, pursuing an online exercise physiology degree allows you to dive into how the body responds to physical activity and prepares you for roles in sports medicine and fitness industries. Similarly, online kinesiology degrees blend principles of biology, anatomy, and biomechanics—ideal for careers in physical therapy, coaching, and rehabilitation.

Healthcare professionals looking to advance may consider specialized certifications. Online options like pmhnp online programs focus on psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner training, while those seeking quick advancement can look into the fastest post master's fnp certificate pathways, offering a streamlined route to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Choosing these paths lets you tailor your education and career to your unique interests within the vast fields of biology, biochemistry, and allied health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles